Skip to content
  • Cosby Bebop
    • Nem

      What a Cohencidence

      • Major Matt Mason

        On Juniper Street.

    • RichardNVulva

      There isn’t anything wrong with an uncircumcised penis. Nothing. I have one. There is nothing wrong with a circumcised penis. Nothing. Let boys and men make a decision about which one they’d rather have, if it even warrants a decision. Taking a knife to a boy’s penis isn’t something trivial. Stop doing something that is effectively a slaves-mark.

      ASK YOUR CHILD’S CONSENT BEFORE TAKING A KNIFE TO THEIR GENITALS.

      • Jesher

        I was circumcized against my will as a child and I somewhat deeply resent it. Only if I think about it too long though. I don’t blame my parents, but I won’t do that to my sons. I can’t help but think the desensitization has skewed my sex drive.

        • Caffeine Sleep

          Search up foreskin restoration. Its a real thing that you can do with just your hands. It works the same way that those ear things that make yoyr earlobes bigger, but you pull on the remaining shaft skin to create a new foreskin _which isn’t identical to the one you’ve lost buts similar

          • Drew W

            StoneToss is always good for a laugh.

          • TrueWOPR

            yes but stretching the skin doesn’t create new nerve endings.

        • frank-the-dank

          >desensitization

          The foreskin is not where the sensation comes from, it comes from the Frenulum

          • TrueWOPR

            and in the vast majority of circumcisions the frenulum is damaged if not removed completely in the process.

          • frank-the-dank

            no, only about a 1/3 of the procedures do that:

            >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frenulum_of_prepuce_of_penis

            >The frenulum was reported to be cut in 26.7%, 20%, and 33.33% of circumcised patients in various surveys

    • free_peach

      I come here to enjoy this kind of content. Followed.

    • Kawaii as Fuck

      POKEY, POKEY, POKEY, POKEY MAAAAAAAAAAN!

  • iverra

    This infuriates me to no end

  • Alistair Grove

    At least American don’t suck them off afterwards. Only Jews do that.

    • Lord Quas

      Wait what?

      • TrueWOPR

        as part of jewish circumcision you’re to staunch the bleeding through oral suction.
        So if you’re jewish you’re by default complacent with child mutilation and child rape.

  • Bullshit_Latin_Phrase2931

    Gee, I just wonder what the cause of that could be….
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e2e1c3c2d76e8e44936c2e1f068624c43c5d9fd4c60ce5fba73df83020ba66ef.jpg
    inb4 tards throw themselves onto the capitalist pyre even if it costs them the “muh jews” rallying cry.

    • Ijustmadethis Jejhd

      Is that the guy from that 3 little pigs book??

    • Love and Justice

      I don’t think the happy capitalist pig-man is behind this one. Probably not a lot of money in foreskin removal: one time external operation without anesthesia.

      Since ancient times, humans have known that removing the foreskin results in markedly decreased penis sensitivity, something that people who get circumcised in adulthood confirm for us today. Much like female circumcision, it was thus practiced to promote chastity, and took off in America in the 30’s as a preventative measure against masturbation.

      For decades some members of the American medical community have struggled to find justifications for circumcision, and the American media has been happy to promote questionable studies in it’s favor. For example, there was a widely publicized African study that suggested lower STD transmission rates for cut penises, but only the cut group was given condoms and instructed in their use.

      I conjecture that circumcision is defended to protect the Jewish community from having their practice banned. Perhaps like a frat-house hazing, it’s a price one paid to get into a group, which makes one value the group more. Circumcision is important for Jewish group identity, so I imagine they don’t really care about gentiles getting circumcised, they just want to keep the gentiles from banning it.

      • Bullshit_Latin_Phrase2931

        I wasn’t talking about the circumcision. “Bugmen” are a consequence of capitalism and neoliberalism.

        • Love and Justice

          If “Bugmen” are urban consumers who base their self-image on material possessions, I think this comic is just using the word as its title as an aside joke on eating bugs.

          While it does involve someone judging different goods and services, I think the point was there’s a guy rejecting unpleasant new ideas while being open to an unpleasant old idea. Thus, the character is being inconsistent, and the audience should reevaluate it’s feelings on a traditionally accepted practice.

      • frank-the-dank

        >removing the foreskin results in markedly decreased penis sensitivity

        Wrong:

        “Neonatal circumcision does not reduce penile sensitivity in men, study finds”

        https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160414114249.htm

    • Sargi

      I love the projection. “It has nothing to do with Jews, only capitalist pigs”. It’s both stupid.

      • free_peach

        It is Bolshevism boogeyman, surprisingly there is still people trying to meme it in 2019 when we all know the real culprits of this abhorrent practice.

    • free_peach
  • Major Matt Mason

    Hear about the mohel who only circumcises elephants?

    The pay isn’t very good, but…

    (•_•)
    ( •_•)>⌐■-■
    (⌐■_■)

    The tips are big.

    EYEAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!

    • Bullshit_Latin_Phrase2931

  • Crash

    Ought to be made a capital crime.

  • Good point! I like his expression in the fourth panel.

Primary Sidebar