Skip to content
Die for Israel...

60 Comments

There isn’t anything wrong with an uncircumcised penis. Nothing. I have one. There is nothing wrong with a circumcised penis. Nothing. Let boys and men make a decision about which one they’d rather have, if it even warrants a decision. Taking a knife to a boy’s penis isn’t something trivial. Stop doing something that is effectively a slaves-mark.

ASK YOUR CHILD’S CONSENT BEFORE TAKING A KNIFE TO THEIR GENITALS.

I was circumcized against my will as a child and I somewhat deeply resent it. Only if I think about it too long though. I don’t blame my parents, but I won’t do that to my sons. I can’t help but think the desensitization has skewed my sex drive.

Search up foreskin restoration. Its a real thing that you can do with just your hands. It works the same way that those ear things that make yoyr earlobes bigger, but you pull on the remaining shaft skin to create a new foreskin _which isn’t identical to the one you’ve lost buts similar

>desensitization

The foreskin is not where the sensation comes from, it comes from the Frenulum

The foreskin keeps the Frenulum securely tucked away along with the rest of your bellend, this prevents constant contact with your legs, underpants and nutts. Without the foreskin you have your sensitive bits in constant contact with everything around them and they thus lose sensitivity.

Yeah. I adult circumcisions, when the organ is much larger and developed. We then have more to cut around, sort of speak. Nothing like a pedo mohel or pedo doctor who is slashing away at a baby penis barely larger than the tip of lipstick. They are cutting off WAY more than simply the sheath.

You have nothing back up what you just said. Maybe perhaps some biased studies that go against basic neuroscience and male sexual physiology. You are nothing but a jew lover looking to get mohels off the hook for their sex crimes against children. Justice will be served

> Let boys and men make a decision about which one they’d rather have

Men only, ‘boys’ implies it’s okay to let minors make the decision.

If you want a circumcision or any other kind of genital surgery I think maybe you should be at least 21 before being able to consent to it.

Maybe even 22, it’s 21 to drink beer in some countries.

At least American don’t suck them off afterwards. Only Jews do that.

Wait what?

Gee, I just wonder what the cause of that could be….
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e2e1c3c2d76e8e44936c2e1f068624c43c5d9fd4c60ce5fba73df83020ba66ef.jpg
inb4 tards throw themselves onto the capitalist pyre even if it costs them the “muh jews” rallying cry.

I don’t think the happy capitalist pig-man is behind this one. Probably not a lot of money in foreskin removal: one time external operation without anesthesia.

Since ancient times, humans have known that removing the foreskin results in markedly decreased penis sensitivity, something that people who get circumcised in adulthood confirm for us today. Much like female circumcision, it was thus practiced to promote chastity, and took off in America in the 30’s as a preventative measure against masturbation.

For decades some members of the American medical community have struggled to find justifications for circumcision, and the American media has been happy to promote questionable studies in it’s favor. For example, there was a widely publicized African study that suggested lower STD transmission rates for cut penises, but only the cut group was given condoms and instructed in their use.

I conjecture that circumcision is defended to protect the Jewish community from having their practice banned. Perhaps like a frat-house hazing, it’s a price one paid to get into a group, which makes one value the group more. Circumcision is important for Jewish group identity, so I imagine they don’t really care about gentiles getting circumcised, they just want to keep the gentiles from banning it.

I wasn’t talking about the circumcision. “Bugmen” are a consequence of capitalism and neoliberalism.

If “Bugmen” are urban consumers who base their self-image on material possessions, I think this comic is just using the word as its title as an aside joke on eating bugs.

While it does involve someone judging different goods and services, I think the point was there’s a guy rejecting unpleasant new ideas while being open to an unpleasant old idea. Thus, the character is being inconsistent, and the audience should reevaluate it’s feelings on a traditionally accepted practice.

>removing the foreskin results in markedly decreased penis sensitivity

Wrong:

“Neonatal circumcision does not reduce penile sensitivity in men, study finds”

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160414114249.htm

Would you believe that a study claiming no loss of eyesight after cutting piece of eyeballs out? No. But you believe this? You must be a pedophile looking to touch and cut children’s genitals

actually, they sell the foreskins to make skin cremes. I hear that they can make like 100k from each foreskin during the life of it through the product cycle.

But yeah it was jews first, then christians, then capitalism.

5% of Israeli jews opt against circumcision. 33% Say they did not wish to circumcise but surrendered to social pressure to circumcise anyways. I really do not understand why any country outside of israel even allows it at all. – Israeli victim of male genital mutilation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar