There isn’t anything wrong with an uncircumcised penis. Nothing. I have one. There is nothing wrong with a circumcised penis. Nothing. Let boys and men make a decision about which one they’d rather have, if it even warrants a decision. Taking a knife to a boy’s penis isn’t something trivial. Stop doing something that is effectively a slaves-mark.
ASK YOUR CHILD’S CONSENT BEFORE TAKING A KNIFE TO THEIR GENITALS.
I was circumcized against my will as a child and I somewhat deeply resent it. Only if I think about it too long though. I don’t blame my parents, but I won’t do that to my sons. I can’t help but think the desensitization has skewed my sex drive.
Search up foreskin restoration. Its a real thing that you can do with just your hands. It works the same way that those ear things that make yoyr earlobes bigger, but you pull on the remaining shaft skin to create a new foreskin _which isn’t identical to the one you’ve lost buts similar
StoneToss is always good for a laugh.
yes but stretching the skin doesn’t create new nerve endings.
>desensitization
The foreskin is not where the sensation comes from, it comes from the Frenulum
and in the vast majority of circumcisions the frenulum is damaged if not removed completely in the process.
>The frenulum was reported to be cut in 26.7%, 20%, and 33.33% of circumcised patients in various surveys
The foreskin keeps the Frenulum securely tucked away along with the rest of your bellend, this prevents constant contact with your legs, underpants and nutts. Without the foreskin you have your sensitive bits in constant contact with everything around them and they thus lose sensitivity.
incorrect
No you, Mr mutilated cock.
nice comeback, mr. no-evidence
Yeah. I adult circumcisions, when the organ is much larger and developed. We then have more to cut around, sort of speak. Nothing like a pedo mohel or pedo doctor who is slashing away at a baby penis barely larger than the tip of lipstick. They are cutting off WAY more than simply the sheath.
not all circumcisions are the same
The foreskin and the
Frenulum provides the man with the neccessary sensations for sex. You need the foreskin to feel texture around the shaft and a number of other sensations
not true
I can confirm that what you said is completely wrong.
You have nothing back up what you just said. Maybe perhaps some biased studies that go against basic neuroscience and male sexual physiology. You are nothing but a jew lover looking to get mohels off the hook for their sex crimes against children. Justice will be served
Yeah but if you have a foreskin you have to wash it during your bath, that’s what an extra five seconds? Ain’t nobody got time for that.
Haha. That extra 5 seconds. Imagine the line for family restroom because of some guys foreskin
> Let boys and men make a decision about which one they’d rather have
Men only, ‘boys’ implies it’s okay to let minors make the decision.
If you want a circumcision or any other kind of genital surgery I think maybe you should be at least 21 before being able to consent to it.
Maybe even 22, it’s 21 to drink beer in some countries.
I come here to enjoy this kind of content. Followed.
POKEY, POKEY, POKEY, POKEY MAAAAAAAAAAN!
This infuriates me to no end
At least American don’t suck them off afterwards. Only Jews do that.
Wait what?
as part of jewish circumcision you’re to staunch the bleeding through oral suction.
So if you’re jewish you’re by default complacent with child mutilation and child rape.
The ritual is called metzizah bpeh. Some rabbis have killed babies through this sort of child rape. No arrests have been made. Because joos
It’s called the Metzitzah B’Peh.
congratulations america, you’re 1% less disgusting.
I don’t think the happy capitalist pig-man is behind this one. Probably not a lot of money in foreskin removal: one time external operation without anesthesia.
Since ancient times, humans have known that removing the foreskin results in markedly decreased penis sensitivity, something that people who get circumcised in adulthood confirm for us today. Much like female circumcision, it was thus practiced to promote chastity, and took off in America in the 30’s as a preventative measure against masturbation.
For decades some members of the American medical community have struggled to find justifications for circumcision, and the American media has been happy to promote questionable studies in it’s favor. For example, there was a widely publicized African study that suggested lower STD transmission rates for cut penises, but only the cut group was given condoms and instructed in their use.
I conjecture that circumcision is defended to protect the Jewish community from having their practice banned. Perhaps like a frat-house hazing, it’s a price one paid to get into a group, which makes one value the group more. Circumcision is important for Jewish group identity, so I imagine they don’t really care about gentiles getting circumcised, they just want to keep the gentiles from banning it.
I wasn’t talking about the circumcision. “Bugmen” are a consequence of capitalism and neoliberalism.
If “Bugmen” are urban consumers who base their self-image on material possessions, I think this comic is just using the word as its title as an aside joke on eating bugs.
While it does involve someone judging different goods and services, I think the point was there’s a guy rejecting unpleasant new ideas while being open to an unpleasant old idea. Thus, the character is being inconsistent, and the audience should reevaluate it’s feelings on a traditionally accepted practice.
>removing the foreskin results in markedly decreased penis sensitivity
Wrong:
“Neonatal circumcision does not reduce penile sensitivity in men, study finds”
Would you believe that a study claiming no loss of eyesight after cutting piece of eyeballs out? No. But you believe this? You must be a pedophile looking to touch and cut children’s genitals
nice non-counter evidence you got there, shill
I dont need counter evidence when I have common sense. I dont need evidence to know that it’s wrong to rape children. Only a jew would need to be “convinced” that this is wrong.
You’re citing a shoddy study that used a sample size of only 62 men, all from a single city. On top of deliberately selecting men without sexual problems – so if there would have been any men with circumcision-related sexual problems, they would have been excluded from this study from the get-go.
actually, they sell the foreskins to make skin cremes. I hear that they can make like 100k from each foreskin during the life of it through the product cycle.
But yeah it was jews first, then christians, then capitalism.
According to the following link, a single forskin can be used to seed growth cultures valued at up to $100,000. That is to say you can grow more tissue from a single foreskin, and after investing a bunch of time and biotech the fruits of your labors might be worth up to 100k.
I love the projection. “It has nothing to do with Jews, only capitalist pigs”. It’s both stupid.
It is Bolshevism boogeyman, surprisingly there is still people trying to meme it in 2019 when we all know the real culprits of this abhorrent practice.
Is this normal? I come from a background where this isn’t even a question that gets brought up, like if we are even asked the answer is automatically no
5% of Israeli jews opt against circumcision. 33% Say they did not wish to circumcise but surrendered to social pressure to circumcise anyways. I really do not understand why any country outside of israel even allows it at all. – Israeli victim of male genital mutilation.
60 Comments
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/79786eb88192654ac1bd1fac524ef9df3941b06209a64279ed47f5061d828281.jpg
What a Cohencidence
On Juniper Street.
There isn’t anything wrong with an uncircumcised penis. Nothing. I have one. There is nothing wrong with a circumcised penis. Nothing. Let boys and men make a decision about which one they’d rather have, if it even warrants a decision. Taking a knife to a boy’s penis isn’t something trivial. Stop doing something that is effectively a slaves-mark.
ASK YOUR CHILD’S CONSENT BEFORE TAKING A KNIFE TO THEIR GENITALS.
I was circumcized against my will as a child and I somewhat deeply resent it. Only if I think about it too long though. I don’t blame my parents, but I won’t do that to my sons. I can’t help but think the desensitization has skewed my sex drive.
Search up foreskin restoration. Its a real thing that you can do with just your hands. It works the same way that those ear things that make yoyr earlobes bigger, but you pull on the remaining shaft skin to create a new foreskin _which isn’t identical to the one you’ve lost buts similar
StoneToss is always good for a laugh.
yes but stretching the skin doesn’t create new nerve endings.
>desensitization
The foreskin is not where the sensation comes from, it comes from the Frenulum
and in the vast majority of circumcisions the frenulum is damaged if not removed completely in the process.
no, only about a 1/3 of the procedures do that:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frenulum_of_prepuce_of_penis
>The frenulum was reported to be cut in 26.7%, 20%, and 33.33% of circumcised patients in various surveys
The foreskin keeps the Frenulum securely tucked away along with the rest of your bellend, this prevents constant contact with your legs, underpants and nutts. Without the foreskin you have your sensitive bits in constant contact with everything around them and they thus lose sensitivity.
incorrect
No you, Mr mutilated cock.
nice comeback, mr. no-evidence
Yeah. I adult circumcisions, when the organ is much larger and developed. We then have more to cut around, sort of speak. Nothing like a pedo mohel or pedo doctor who is slashing away at a baby penis barely larger than the tip of lipstick. They are cutting off WAY more than simply the sheath.
not all circumcisions are the same
The foreskin and the
Frenulum provides the man with the neccessary sensations for sex. You need the foreskin to feel texture around the shaft and a number of other sensations
not true
I can confirm that what you said is completely wrong.
You have nothing back up what you just said. Maybe perhaps some biased studies that go against basic neuroscience and male sexual physiology. You are nothing but a jew lover looking to get mohels off the hook for their sex crimes against children. Justice will be served
Yeah but if you have a foreskin you have to wash it during your bath, that’s what an extra five seconds? Ain’t nobody got time for that.
Haha. That extra 5 seconds. Imagine the line for family restroom because of some guys foreskin
> Let boys and men make a decision about which one they’d rather have
Men only, ‘boys’ implies it’s okay to let minors make the decision.
If you want a circumcision or any other kind of genital surgery I think maybe you should be at least 21 before being able to consent to it.
Maybe even 22, it’s 21 to drink beer in some countries.
I come here to enjoy this kind of content. Followed.
POKEY, POKEY, POKEY, POKEY MAAAAAAAAAAN!
This infuriates me to no end
At least American don’t suck them off afterwards. Only Jews do that.
Wait what?
as part of jewish circumcision you’re to staunch the bleeding through oral suction.
So if you’re jewish you’re by default complacent with child mutilation and child rape.
The ritual is called metzizah bpeh. Some rabbis have killed babies through this sort of child rape. No arrests have been made. Because joos
It’s called the Metzitzah B’Peh.
congratulations america, you’re 1% less disgusting.
Gee, I just wonder what the cause of that could be….
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e2e1c3c2d76e8e44936c2e1f068624c43c5d9fd4c60ce5fba73df83020ba66ef.jpg
inb4 tards throw themselves onto the capitalist pyre even if it costs them the “muh jews” rallying cry.
Is that the guy from that 3 little pigs book??
I don’t think the happy capitalist pig-man is behind this one. Probably not a lot of money in foreskin removal: one time external operation without anesthesia.
Since ancient times, humans have known that removing the foreskin results in markedly decreased penis sensitivity, something that people who get circumcised in adulthood confirm for us today. Much like female circumcision, it was thus practiced to promote chastity, and took off in America in the 30’s as a preventative measure against masturbation.
For decades some members of the American medical community have struggled to find justifications for circumcision, and the American media has been happy to promote questionable studies in it’s favor. For example, there was a widely publicized African study that suggested lower STD transmission rates for cut penises, but only the cut group was given condoms and instructed in their use.
I conjecture that circumcision is defended to protect the Jewish community from having their practice banned. Perhaps like a frat-house hazing, it’s a price one paid to get into a group, which makes one value the group more. Circumcision is important for Jewish group identity, so I imagine they don’t really care about gentiles getting circumcised, they just want to keep the gentiles from banning it.
I wasn’t talking about the circumcision. “Bugmen” are a consequence of capitalism and neoliberalism.
If “Bugmen” are urban consumers who base their self-image on material possessions, I think this comic is just using the word as its title as an aside joke on eating bugs.
While it does involve someone judging different goods and services, I think the point was there’s a guy rejecting unpleasant new ideas while being open to an unpleasant old idea. Thus, the character is being inconsistent, and the audience should reevaluate it’s feelings on a traditionally accepted practice.
>removing the foreskin results in markedly decreased penis sensitivity
Wrong:
“Neonatal circumcision does not reduce penile sensitivity in men, study finds”
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160414114249.htm
Would you believe that a study claiming no loss of eyesight after cutting piece of eyeballs out? No. But you believe this? You must be a pedophile looking to touch and cut children’s genitals
nice non-counter evidence you got there, shill
I dont need counter evidence when I have common sense. I dont need evidence to know that it’s wrong to rape children. Only a jew would need to be “convinced” that this is wrong.
You’re citing a shoddy study that used a sample size of only 62 men, all from a single city. On top of deliberately selecting men without sexual problems – so if there would have been any men with circumcision-related sexual problems, they would have been excluded from this study from the get-go.
A study that criticizes and politely refutes the study you cited:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tre.531
actually, they sell the foreskins to make skin cremes. I hear that they can make like 100k from each foreskin during the life of it through the product cycle.
But yeah it was jews first, then christians, then capitalism.
According to the following link, a single forskin can be used to seed growth cultures valued at up to $100,000. That is to say you can grow more tissue from a single foreskin, and after investing a bunch of time and biotech the fruits of your labors might be worth up to 100k.
https://www.alternet.org/2007/02/foreskin_face_cream_and_other_beauty_products_of_the_future/
I love the projection. “It has nothing to do with Jews, only capitalist pigs”. It’s both stupid.
It is Bolshevism boogeyman, surprisingly there is still people trying to meme it in 2019 when we all know the real culprits of this abhorrent practice.
https://pics.me.me/goyim-i-goyim-i-happy-merchant-know-your-52528532.png
Fixed that for you.
Hear about the mohel who only circumcises elephants?
The pay isn’t very good, but…
(•_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)
The tips are big.
EYEAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!
Ought to be made a capital crime.
Circumcisers should hunted down and executed on the same day as the trial, all on TV for family entertainment
Good point! I like his expression in the fourth panel.
Our body our choice men should not be circumcised without their permission. Period.
They want our smegma cock cheese!
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7cd1a7d3a5d237d6095b40788b6a029ab0fd6131c8acc87352b001cbdb3b2c55.jpg
“CORRUPT THE CHILD. CONSUME THEM ALL.”
A child can’t consent, I.E. don’t do it.
Is this normal? I come from a background where this isn’t even a question that gets brought up, like if we are even asked the answer is automatically no
5% of Israeli jews opt against circumcision. 33% Say they did not wish to circumcise but surrendered to social pressure to circumcise anyways. I really do not understand why any country outside of israel even allows it at all. – Israeli victim of male genital mutilation.