Skip to content
  • T4M3R

    What does he mean to say in the last panel

    • CMK

      You king pieces in checkers, not chess.

      • mynameiscat

        So basically Trump thinks he’s got it under control even though the American population is railing on him for doing horrible regressive stuff like inciting violence.

        • dorkland

          No, its a satire on the fact that people talk about how Trump is pulling all the strings (controlling the media narrative, using Twitter to subconsciously signal “racist” voters, and working to tear the Democratic Party apart) while simultaneously calling him a stupid old racist dotard/retard/etc.

          He can’t be both a mastermind of “4D chess” and also an utter buffoon. You pick the one you want to believe.

          • mynameiscat

            Who said he’s a mastermind? I’ve not seen any leftists doing that. There’s a few corporations who are supporting him, like Fox, but he definitely isn’t doing it himself.
            Quick reminder:
            Trump has literally instated racist policies.
            Trump has cut taxes to the rich who lobby him, increasing debt while not helping most Americans.
            Trump has done nothing meaningful for the economy, it has only continued its upswing from the Obama administration.
            Trump has worsened diplomatic relations with our ALLIES.
            Trump has tried to become friends with autocratic leaders like Erdogan, Putin, and Kim instead of holding a hardline to support American interests, contrary to his promises.

          • Lesbian

            dude trump literally caused every problem in America

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            Please note that this is a paid shill with six alt accounts. Report it so it’s banned forever.

          • mynameiscat

            Im not doing this for money, pal. Im doing it for the fun of seeing the delusional right fall apart when presented with reasonable arguments. And those extra accounts aren’t mine, they’re my center-left friends from work.

        • Blackbeard

          When did he incite violence? Do you have a direct quote?

          • mynameiscat

            Incite: Encourage or stir up.
            He’s constantly pushed the agenda that hispanics are invading the USA, and that we have to fight against it. When a supporter at one of his rallies shouted “Shoot them!” he subtly entertained the idea instead of stopping the hate before it became violence. His rhetoric directly caused the El Paso shooting. That is not debatable, that is fact; just look at the shooter’s history and the lead-up to the shooting.
            Sometimes, you don’t need a specific quote to send a message. That is one subtlety of politics that Trump does seem to understand.

          • dorkland

            When you don’t think you need direct evidence of something, it’s not called a fact, it’s called an opinion. It is a fact that my dog eats his own shit. It is an opinion that you believe Trump’s conduct caused a mass shooting.

            Just because you strongly believe an opinion doesn’t make it fact.

          • mynameiscat

            Let me clear this up, there isn’t direct quotation of Trump saying “do violence”.
            There however is direct evidence that Trump caused the El Paso shooting. The shooter quite literally explained beforehand that he’s committing the shooting because of the “invasion” and cited hateful statements by Trump. He also posted a picture of the name “Trump” spelled out in firearms. If he literally said he’s doing it for Trump, and Trump has encouraged the ideas that lead to violence without taking action to prevent violence, then there’s no debating that this was Trump’s fault. That’s direct evidence.
            Trump inciting violence is an opinion, regardless of how well supported.
            Trump causing violence is a fact.

          • Jackson Peds

            The El Paso shooting was caused by unregulated immigration, if immigrants haven’t invaded, the shooting wouldn’t have taken place.

          • CMK

            But there is an actual invasion. For you to condemn Trump for pointing that out, you would need to condemn any person who points out facts if someone else kills people on the basis of those facts.

          • mynameiscat

            And here is the root of ignorance. There is no invasion! Mexico owned Texas first, America went to war and INVADED them! Of course there are hispanics living near the border, they were there first and we conquered them! No hispanics are crossing the border just to take over America. There are undocumented immigrants, yes, but that’s for complicated economic reasons mostly due to American border security. That’s hardly an invasion. Simplifying an overwhelmingly complex issue to “they’re invading us” is the exact kind of ignorance that leads to shootings. We all need to try and be more understanding and considerate so that tragic, discriminatory hate crimes don’t happen in the future.

          • CMK

            Mate, Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and California were not invaded. Mexicans invited Americans to settle Texas, then known as Tejas, in the early 1800s so that they stop the Indians from invading them. Americans were willingly being let in, and soon outnumbered the Mexicans in Tejas by one to three. In 1823, Mexico declared independence from Spain, and they soon after made slavery illegal, which is what caused the Texans to revolt. The Texans defeated the Mexicans and achieved independence, and were annexed by the United States in 1845.

            After 1848, the end of the Mexican-American War, the Americans gained the other territories mentioned in the first sentence in what was known as the Mexican Cession. These lands were acquired through the rules of war, like the entirety of Mexico was.

            Compare this to what is happening in the United States today, where the Mexicans and other Hispanics are crossing the border illegally by the millions, at a time when many people want even legal immigration to be greatly curbed or even stopped. It’s not the same at all. It is an invasion.

            By the way, this isn’t only a problem in the Southwest. Almost every single state in the country has its highest source of immigration being Mexico, with other Hispanic nations being added to that number. I live in New Jersey, and at least (at least!) half of the people that I see everywhere are Hispanic.

          • mynameiscat

            Taking territory in war is quite literally what it means to invade. Also, were Americans the good guys if they were mad that they couldn’t have slaves? Mexico was a country of settlers who wanted freedom, so they certainly weren’t invading anyone. If we count wars of independence as invasion, then America is a country of invaders too.

            Mexicans are not crossing the border in millions to illegally settle. The reason we have undocumented Mexicans is simple. Mexicans would come to America to work and make money for their families, then go back to Mexico. The same thing still happens in India, it’s a very noble thing for the supporter of the family to do this. Then America made border crossing more difficult, so that if Mexicans wanted to go home, they wouldn’t be able to go back to America again. Thus, they stayed.
            That would make it our fault. They’re just innocent people wanting to support their families.

            And even so, it’s not bad to have them here. They’re very hardworking, and willing to take the bottom of the barrel jobs that the rest of us don’t want. Immigrants, statistically, are more beneficial to our country than entitled white middle class. Per person, of course. The only reason America is the great country it is now is because of immigrants. We have a diverse, American culture made from people across the world. American isn’t a race, it’s a people. Without immigrants, we would be a purebred remnant of the British Empire, with lots of resources but too few people. We have space for immigrants and always have, so let them come! And for the ones who are already here, have them legally registered as Americans so that we can properly collect taxes from them. We might as well since they’re here anyways. No need to SHOOT THEM.

          • CMK

            I’m not going to refute to this ridiculously stupid comment.

          • mynameiscat

            It’s okay if you still disagree with me. Different viewpoints are natural. I just want people to know the full story so that they can make an educated opinion on it, even it it differs from my own. I do hope that someone can read this, and decide to forego hate so we can work together towards a solution that helps all people. It’s easy to look at people who are different and blame them for our problems. It takes strength to find the best path forward. Keep an open mind, and be strong.

          • dorkland

            Anyways I’m not here to talk about why you think things happen. I’m letting you know what the comic is about

          • Blackbeard

            Oh, so you mean like AOC’s concentration camp rethoric “indirectly” caused some guy attacking a migrant detention center with an incendiary device? Is that comparable or is that something different?

          • mynameiscat

            To make it clear, I’m not a particular fan of everything AOC has done.
            To the point, these are completely different scenarios. Both angrily condemn something they see as a problem. That’s where the similarity ends. AOC treats the concentration camps like a political problem that we have to campaign against, and tell the government we won’t stand for nazi-style treatment of minorities. Trump treats the undocumented immigrants issue as a military campaign, packaging it as though Hispanics are physically invading us and we have to fight back. Trump uses military language, AOC does not. AOC doesn’t even imply that violence is an option to fight the concentration camps. Trump quite literally reacted encouragingly when a supporter suggested killing all the hispanics. That is the difference, Trump doesn’t have the tactility that AOC does. Trump encourages violence, AOC does not.

            also who the fuck thinks concentration camps are a good idea? it doesn’t justify murder, but good god does something have to be done

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            We’re going to slaughter you and everyone who believes your lies. There’s nothing you can do to stop it.

          • mynameiscat

            sure bud

  • russian_bot_lmao

    Respond with “Sad” to downvote this for its stupidity

    • QuickshooterMk2
      • mynameiscat

        If you can’t beat them in a free and open debate, use a homophobic slur instead! That’ll prove that you’re right!

        you’re on the wrong side of history, as bigoted regressives always have been

        • QuickshooterMk2
          • mynameiscat

            Yep, that’s homophobic! Using homophobic slurs! That’s homophobia!
            Homosexuality isn’t a choice. You are born with your sexuality. Saying that one sexuality over another is innately bad is like saying one skin color is innately bad. Oh wait, you do say that.
            What if you were born a gay black man? It was only luck of the draw you weren’t. You didn’t choose to be born. Everyone, regardless of how they were born, is still a human being with thoughts and feelings. They don’t deserve hate, they deserve a regular life like everyone else.

          • QuickshooterMk2

            Lol what a faggot
            faggotry is neither a choice nor an orientation, it’s a diseased and it used to be classified as such before some Faggot kike managed to pressure medical professional to classify it as normal
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e7cf968fca384037517c7e3415d5ea44fa272eba83cc8fc12a65ff89d661aa17.jpg

            no one is born a faggot, faggotry is transferred the same way as pedophilia
            by molesting minors, there is no difference between pedophiles and faggots
            Pedophilia is how faggots reproduce
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d4867eb355e671905f29fdb1437f069d6a8921fd198b5a0821bb0d6f76dde751.png
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2e799131aa99f1c84e9a607b7f930cdafd9c1ad04ef7b2ec87494b432ce477b6.png

            now go shill for faggotry elsewhere, Kike.

          • mynameiscat

            This is insultingly wrong. The quality of information here is comparable to that of propaganda in a totalitarian regime. I can prove it by dissecting every claim made here, image by image.

            First Image: The warping here to portray a narrative is severe, with the text colors and wording intended to scare. The fact they are using here is about Frank Kameny. Kameny was a gay man who was fired for his homosexuality. He was not flagrant, disruptive, or in any way questionable aside from being a homosexual in a time where homosexuality was not widely accepted. He started an organization to bring awareness to the oppressed gay and lesbian community, and eventually was able to debate with the APA on whether homosexuality should be a mental disorder. In a standard debate with a medical professional, he convinced the APA that homosexuality is not a mental disorder, but instead that sexuality is a trait assigned at birth. As for the second statement, he is quoted as saying the following: “If bestiality with consenting animals provides happiness to some people, let them pursue their happiness. That is Americanism in action.” Obviously consenting animals are basically impossible, so as he knew, this statement meant little, but the sentiment is reasonable.
            If you can find a part of this which is genuinely objectionable on reasonable grounds, by all means, tell me. Kameny only fought for the right of people to do what makes them happy when no one is harmed by it.

            Second image: Pride is for kids, too. Yep! Sexuality and gender are something you are biologically assigned at birth. You don’t become gay or trans or bi or otherwise queer later in life, although you usually only realize and admit it later on. The bullshit propaganda is that you’re trying to frame this as support for pedophilia. It’s not! Pedophilia is totally not acceptable, in the LGBT community or otherwise! Your claim that pedophilia spreads homosexuality is unequivocally wrong. The second part of the image shows a gay man kissing a child. Is there something wrong here? He’s not romantically affiliated with that child, that child is presumably his adopted son. Parents giving their children pecks is completely normal. You frame the image as pedophilia again, which is intentionally misleading. There is nothing wrong happening in this image. If a straight mother kissed her son, no one would care. The same applies here. I see through your deceptive, false narrative.

            Third image: This quote by David Duke (David Ernest Duke (born July 1, 1950) is a prominent American white supremacist, white nationalist politician, white separatist, antisemitic conspiracy theorist, Holocaust denier, convicted felon, and former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. Sounds like an insightful analyst already) is sprinkled with half-truths to paint a narrative that homosexuality is harmful. First of all, the vast majority of homosexuals are nothing like the rambunctious, outgoing sex-obsessed extroverts pictured alongside the quote. But there are outliers in every group. For homosexuals, the outliers are very open about their sexuality. For homophobes, the outliers are mass shooters. But you don’t mention that, how odd.
            In the quote, he explains how homosexuals spread aids which is a horrible disease that kills millions. That’s true, but deceptive because it implies Aids is entirely the fault of homosexuals. No. Aids is spread through blood, which means that sexually active homosexual men can spread it as an STI. The thing is, straight couples spread Aids too. And the vast majority of people infected with Aids don’t have it because of homosexuality, the same goes for the people who have died from it. The vast majority of people infected with Aids are in Africa, and got it due to the poor sanitary conditions of the third world.
            The quote is intentionally misleading, and lies by omission about the true nature of Aids. Homosexuality has not killed millions or caused the greatest plague in years. You could quite literally rewrite this quote targeted at straight people who spread Aids, and it would be just as truthful.

            And with that, your best material supporting homophobia has been proven as half-truths designed to deceive people into hating people who are different than them. You have 2 options here: 1. Accept that you’re wrong, and join society as a decent human being or 2. Call me a fag and look like an idiot.

          • QuickshooterMk2

            monstrous wall of text has no intrinsic merit, unless lack of paragraphs be considered a virtue…

          • mynameiscat

            TL:DR The three images you posted are misleading and intentionally deceitful, there are no real arguments against homosexuality. Fact. Homophobia is fundamentally stupid.
            And unless you can debunk at least 51% what I’ve said, then you’ve lost this argument and proven your ignorance.

          • mynameiscat

            My comment got falsely marked as spam because of its length. I’ll reformat for your consumption here.

          • mynameiscat

            This is insultingly wrong. The quality of information here is comparable to that of propaganda in a totalitarian regime. I can prove it by dissecting every claim made here, image by image.

          • mynameiscat

            First Image: The warping here to portray a narrative is severe, with the text colors and wording intended to scare. The fact they are using here is about Frank Kameny. Kameny was a gay man who was fired for his homosexuality. He was not flagrant, disruptive, or in any way questionable aside from being a homosexual in a time where homosexuality was not widely accepted. He started an organization to bring awareness to the oppressed gay and lesbian community, and eventually was able to debate with the APA on whether homosexuality should be a mental disorder. In a standard debate with a medical professional, he convinced the APA that homosexuality is not a mental disorder, but instead that sexuality is a trait assigned at birth. As for the second statement, he is quoted as saying the following: “If bestiality with consenting animals provides happiness to some people, let them pursue their happiness. That is Americanism in action.” Obviously consenting animals are basically impossible, so as he knew, this statement meant little, but the sentiment is reasonable.
            If you can find a part of this which is genuinely objectionable on reasonable grounds, by all means, tell me. Kameny only fought for the right of people to do what makes them happy when no one is harmed by it.

          • mynameiscat

            Second image: Pride is for kids, too. Yep! Sexuality and gender are something you are biologically assigned at birth. You don’t become gay or trans or bi or otherwise queer later in life, although you usually only realize and admit it later on. The bullshit propaganda is that you’re trying to frame this as support for pedophilia. It’s not! Pedophilia is totally not acceptable, in the LGBT community or otherwise! Your claim that pedophilia spreads homosexuality is unequivocally wrong. The second part of the image shows a gay man kissing a child. Is there something wrong here? He’s not romantically affiliated with that child, that child is presumably his adopted son. Parents giving their children pecks is completely normal. You frame the image as pedophilia again, which is intentionally misleading. There is nothing wrong happening in this image. If a straight mother kissed her son, no one would care. The same applies here. I see through your deceptive, false narrative.

          • mynameiscat

            Third image: This quote by David Duke (“David Ernest Duke (born July 1, 1950) is a prominent American white supremacist, white nationalist politician, white separatist, antisemitic conspiracy theorist, Holocaust denier, convicted felon, and former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.” Sounds like an insightful analyst already) is sprinkled with half-truths to paint a narrative that homosexuality is harmful. First of all, the vast majority of homosexuals are nothing like the rambunctious, outgoing sex-obsessed extroverts pictured alongside the quote. But there are outliers in every group. For homosexuals, the outliers are very open about their sexuality. For homophobes, the outliers are mass shooters. But you don’t mention that, how odd.
            In the quote, he explains how homosexuals spread aids which is a horrible disease that kills millions. That’s true, but deceptive because it implies Aids is entirely the fault of homosexuals. No. Aids is spread through blood, which means that sexually active homosexual men can spread it as an STI. The thing is, straight couples spread Aids too. And the vast majority of people infected with Aids don’t have it because of homosexuality, the same goes for the people who have died from it. The vast majority of people infected with Aids are in Africa, and got it due to the poor sanitary conditions of the third world.
            The quote is intentionally misleading, and lies by omission about the true nature of Aids. Homosexuality has not killed millions or caused the greatest plague in years. You could quite literally rewrite this quote targeted at straight people who spread Aids, and it would be just as truthful.

          • mynameiscat

            And with that, your best material supporting homophobia has been proven as half-truths designed to deceive people into hating people who are different than them. You have 2 options here: 1. Accept that you’re wrong, and join society as a decent human being or 2. Call me a fag and look like an idiot.

          • Jackson Peds

            Look at this fucking pedo apologizer here!

          • mynameiscat

            Me: Don’t try to say LGBTs accept pedophilia, they don’t. Pedophilia is totally not acceptable, in the LGBT community or otherwise!
            Big brain Jackson: Look at this fucking pedo apologizer here!

          • Jackson Peds

            Cat: I don’t defend pedophilia BUT pedophilia is OK, Pride for kids is OK, sexualization of minors is OK, gay couples human pets is OK!

            Are you a fag a retard or to summarize: a leftist?

          • mynameiscat

            I didn’t say pedophilia is OK. I didn’t say sexualization of minors is OK.
            My words: “Pedophilia is totally not acceptable”
            Lying about what I’ve said proves you have no real arguments against my points. If you still think Pedophilia is accepted in the LGBT, show me evidence. Don’t lie and throw insults. That does nothing.

            Are you deceitful and unable to hold your own in an actual debate or to summarize: a right winger?

          • Jackson Peds

            We all have eyes to see whether you defend pedophilia and the sexualization of minors directly or inderectly or not it’s in your own posts, whether is OK for two married fags to own a pet child and going mouth-to-mouth with it, or bring set pet in their freakshow parades.

            Anyhow:

            21% of pedophiles identify as exclusively homosexual: http://www.gundersenhealth.org/ncptc/jacob-wetterling-resource-center/keep-kids-safe/sexual-offenders-101/sexuality-of-offenders/

            But only 4.5% of the population is non-heterosexual: https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/record-4-5-percent-u-s-adults-identify-lgbt-gallup-n877486

            So a fag is 4 times more likely to rape or molest a child than a non-fag.

          • mynameiscat

            Ugh, how awful that this heterosexual couple adopted a pet human (child) and goes mouth-to-mouth with it (kissing their child).
            That’s the logic you’re using here. Being hetero or homo means nothing to that statement. It’s normal behaviour, and completely legal.

            Anyhow:

            73% of terrorists are right-wing extremists:
            https://www.cato.org/blog/gao-weighs-countering-violent-extremism

            But only 20% of the population vote for right wing political parties:
            https://www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/index.html

            So a right-winger is almost 4 times more likely to gun down swathes of innocent people than literally anyone else.

          • Jackson Peds

            Addresses nothing, deflects, tries to change the subject.

            What a total fag.

            P.S. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/521058cd174f274953ca2e87cc37270a8818686740e5359d1630689a7c9b6f82.jpg

            In any case, those are the faces of USA’s Mass Shooters of 19′. Notice a pattern there?

          • mynameiscat

            Actually I addressed your first point and pointed out its invalidity.

            I said terrorists, not mass shooters. Stop deflecting and trying to change the subject.

            You clearly are too thick to see the point. Groups of people have problems relevant to the group traits. That’s inevitable. If we call all LGBTs fags and monsters because of a select few, then the entire right wing are terrorists and should be treated as such.

            LGBTs are regular people who are born as such. If two men have a consenting relationship in the confines of their home, what the hell is your problem? Any pedophiles are criminals, and treated as such. They don’t represent the LGBT, as I assume you would say right-wing terrorists don’t represent the right wing. Anything illegal or misguided done by a person is handled promptly, regardless of their race, political affiliation, or sexuality.

            What exactly are you trying to say? If you think gay marriage should be illegal, give me 1 good reason why. If that’s not what you mean, then tell me specifically what you think should happen, and give me at least 1 good reason why.

          • Jackson Peds

            You didn’t addressed anything you just tried to deflect and avoid reply to anything.

            Is it true that while being 4% of the population fags are responsible for 21% of the rapes, yes or no?

            Also Mass Shooters are terrorists or often are treated as terrorists.

            Like Stephen Paddock’s case, who in his aftermath the state asked for deeper anti-terrorist regulations.

            Paddock was a gambler and a drug addict, just FYI.

          • mynameiscat

            “Ugh, how awful that this heterosexual couple adopted a pet human (child) and goes mouth-to-mouth with it (kissing their child).
            That’s the logic you’re using here. Being hetero or homo means nothing to that statement. It’s normal behaviour, and completely legal.”
            ^That is addressing a point.

            >Is it true… yes or no?
            If your claim was untrue, I would’ve called you on it. It is true. As is my claim, you can check the sources. I don’t know who Paddock is, if he was a bad person then you are justified in not liking him. My point stands regardless.

            And can you stop calling them fags? I could start calling right-wingers racists if you’d like. Personally, I don’t think we should use slurs to describe people, but it’s your choice. If you call them fags, I’ll call right-wingers racists.

            Back to my request now. What is your overarching point/goal in your homophobia?

          • Simon Rose

            >”C-c-could you….p-please stop c-caling….th-them f-f-fags?”

            I’m nowhere near as extreme as some of these people here are but if you seriously come to an alt right webcomic’s anonymous comment section and ask people to change their language on your whim you are definitely a massive faggot.

          • mynameiscat

            yeah that’s fair

          • katyn_nkvd_operatioms_Karl_Mar

            “mynameiscat”: You seem extremely Jewish, and like you do not believe at all what you are writing.

            If you are indeed Jewish, I would like to ask some questions: Can one take the survival of the human species for granted? And are Jews overall a threat to the survival of the human species, including themselves? Can the human species survive without truth, without systems that preserve, protect, find, etc. truth? If Jews were the only humans on Earth, and they had an excellent starting point, would they end up exterminating themselves sooner or later, and thus sentient life with them, in difference to many/most other peoples put in the same situation?

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            We don’t care about your jewish lies. We don’t care that you’re paid to post here. Every word you say is a lie. We’re going to kill you if you don’t do it first.

          • SalvadorZombie

            Wow, an actual death threat to an entire group of people.

            Almost as if you melting snowflakes are the entire problem, and have been all along. Hmm.

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            Not sure you replied to the right post.

          • Jesher

            It’s also transferred by watching traps get the cum fucked out of them.

          • Except for all the little boys turned into faggots by older faggots molesting them.

            Some are born. More are made.

        • Shadowban This Cowards

          The funniest thing about you is that you’re going to be raped to death by the niggers and faggots you love so much. Either that or you’ll just kill yourself when we knock on your door. Run along now, kiddo.

          • mynameiscat

            I know I’m doing a good job of winning the argument when you resort to saying things like this. You’re really cutting deep here, calling me a jew! Very classy! I know I can’t change your mind because you’re too far gone. Still, it’s been fun seeing how quickly logic collapses here in the face of someone who actually knows something about politics.

          • Guy Fawkes

            “The other guy is saying mean things to me, therefore I have won this argument.”

            Are you 14 or something?

          • mynameiscat

            Don’t strawman me.
            I gave a well though out and in depth argument countering the guy’s points. The opposition responded with insults because there is no further explanation to support their side here. When one side cannot formulate a response to the argument, they have lost. If you haven’t lost, then disprove my points! Insults do nothing except showcase idiocy and lack of thought. I haven’t won because the opposition is insulting me. I’ve won because the opposition isn’t able to continue the argument because I’ve debunked all their material.

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            >>“I win because I posted proven lies”

            lol, kill yourself jew

          • mynameiscat

            If they’re proven lies, why don’t you show me the proof?

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            K. Repost a single one of your statements. Pick literally any of them. You will be disproven.

    • Simon Rose

      I’d like to see how long you can last here before you lose your mind entirely.

  • QuickshooterMk2
    • Shadowban This Cowards

      Trump has been owned by jews since 1989. He has never supported whites.

    • Jesher

      lol is that why Netanyahu tweeted a very thinly veiled threat — implying they’ll do the same thing to him that they did to Kennedy?

      You don’t make thinly veiled threats at your own puppets. Think better pl0x.

      • John Doe

        Yes they can do that. And yes some people like Trump are tools and he thinks that he can get his children into Jewish society, but he is still not a Jew himself.

        • Jesher

          Is that why Israel and diaspora Jews are sabotaging him from every angle? Because he works for them? Instead of the fact that congress won’t budge unless you kowtow to Jews?

          • John Doe

            He is giving his family off to Jews. He has been siding with them for the longest time.

          • John Doe

            He invites sabotage. Like I said they will either accept his children or disown the Trump genetics eventually. He is trying to adapt his family line to merge with Jews, no matter if the Jews themselves turn on Trump.

            It is just pathetic that you still try to cling to Trump.

      • Taha Ghassemi

        Can you link the tweet?

    • Taha Ghassemi

      *Implying the reader is a white supremacist*

  • amplifact

    these comics aren’t exactly hard to understand, why are the comments always packed with clueless autists

    • Renaud Aubert

      Bragging about understanding a comic is as retarded as not getting it

      • CMK

        He isn’t bragging.

      • Vincent Hart

        Gas yourself, faggot.

        • Renaud Aubert

          u mad?

        • SalvadorZombie

          Yikes. Calm down and have a milkshake, chief.

          • Jesher

            I fuckin love milkshakes.

          • John Doe

            Milkshakes are disgusting. Just like drinking melted ice-cream.

          • Jesher

            I fuckin’ love drinking melted ice-cream.

          • John Javier

            Yucks

      • amplifact

        i’d be bragging if i said it WAS hard, though

  • dagdamor1

    That’s a legitimate mechanic in Chess, though.

    It’s called a “promotion”.

    • deathbyosiris

      in chess, you can only “promote” a pawn to a knight, bishop, rook, or queen. there can never be more than two kings on the board.

  • Mexican Shitposting

    So Trump somehow managed to get the support of stormniggers while being in favor of Israel?

Primary Sidebar