Skip to content
  • quickshooter

    Marriage used to be a holy oath that if ever broken it would mean shame/ex-communication

    after KIKES secularized it became shitty
    fag marriage, weaponized marriage against straight men, and of course now they’re pushing the pedophillia angle of “love is love”
    marriage is no longer sacred, marriage is nothing more than a finaical contract that the (((divorce court))) could make it’s shekels

    remove kikes from marriage,outlaw all faggotry, feminism, and miscegeny
    and make marriage sacred again.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6c60a1fcd9a9ec428919c1a41b69d142a6a3a8b068d1ca49ea804e8856f5a6cd.jpg

    • Kakurenjou

      You do know that marriage has existed long before Christianity, right?

      • Regardless of some of his word choices, he isn’t wrong. Even before Christianity, divorce was not what it is today; even if the laws were formally the same as what might exist today in any given pre-Christian state, modern social conditions enabled by secularist, antinatalist, and feminist government policies outside of marriage itself actually make things much worse.

        Gay marriage just reduces marriage to joint filing on your taxes with some random person. Even when a woman had a scandal about marrying her brother for immigration fraud purposes this year, it didn’t become a major scandal and her seat stayed Safe D just because no one cares about it. Marriage no longer serves any purpose except exploiting it for benefits from the government.

        • Matis Caouette

          Good morning! Marriage don’t have to be seen as sacred by everyone to be considered like it is by individuals. Forcing your own volitions on other people just because something isn’t as sacred as it used to be seem weird. In the end, no matter what others do, we are the ones that are doing the best to preserve our own beliefs. I get the vibe that this seems like a very christian thread, but please, try not to sound like dictators… It doesn’t fit with the vibe people usually get.

      • Alexander Patten

        You’re damn right it’s pre-Christian. Lifetime monogamous male with female marriage is the single best system for fostering children. And the next generation of any society will only be as good as the children the previous generation fostered. That’s why the traditional family unit is so important.

    • Meme King

      Though marriage has existed in cultures before and independent of christianity (rome, east asia, mesopotamia, etc.) and was in most cases not a religious thing, maybe outlawing divorce would be a very good thing.

      • quickshooter

        outlawing divorce would be a great first step

        • you won’t have to worry about that since you’ll never touch a woman

          • quickshooter

            Already have mr soyboy
            women respect men who respect themselves, if you have no respect for yourself then you may as well commit suicide, cause you won’t get any 😉

          • Edriss Scofield

            War of the Anthonies

        • Anthony Leone

          Outlawing divorce? What happens if the man is married to a woman who always cheats? Or to the woman whose husband always beats her?

          You can’t expect people to stay married to each other if they are unhappy of unsafe or simply fallen out of love with one another.

        • dlev

          *he typed furiously from his mom’s basement, as he took another slurp of his Mt Dew*

          • quickshooter

            nice projection there, schlomo.

          • SuperSeal

            *as a cloud of dorito dust puffs in the air*

    • Pr4g

      Isn’t it a shame that nowadays people aren’t stuck for life with someone they don’t love? I miss the good old days where you had to marry young and you were stuck with this person for life!

      How can people shit on more freedom? I have the freedom to divorce someone I don’t love, they’re a good thing.

      • quickshooter

        Marriage is not something to be taken lightly
        you shouldn’t marry someone you’ve just met and you shouldn’t make children with someone who might be a bad parent

        if you failed to realize it, Marriage original purpose is for RAISING CHILDREN the right and traditional way
        none of that “single mother” crap, because it produces criminals and niggers

        • Pr4g

          You still can raise a children with two separated parents, as long as both are present in their children’s life.

          And, lol, you didn’t need to add the nigger part but you wanted to be sure to be as offensive as possible.

          • quickshooter

            >being offended by the word “nigger”
            buddy, you should crawl back to reddit or whatever soy infested soy you came from

            Stonetoss is for redpilled people only, nigger lovers and coalburners
            GTFO

          • Pr4g

            Implying I’m offended when I even used the word myself.

            Yeah, no, you saying it doesn’t make it true.

            “Stonetoss is for redpilled people only, nigger lovers and coalburners”

            Oh fuck off with your unironic use of redpill lol

        • Paul Genovese

          “produces niggers”

          lol and your racist!

          • Scrungo

            *You’re
            Lmao sorry I had to

      • You are Not a Victim

        Because your “freedom”, like a Muslim’s “freedom”, poisons the well like nothing else. Look up some of the crime statistics of children raised by single mothers- particularly single *mothers*- before you run your mouth about this shit.

        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4455e80305902fa620ae30c611d793e5cdce092360efa2f2426ba404941510bc.jpg

        • Pr4g

          Lol sure, let’s take away our freedom. I’m sure you’d love a life with an abusive partner that you can’t leave because having freedom is bad!

        • Edriss Scofield

          What kind of an argument is this? It’s strange that you even use “poisoned wells” because that’s what staying in bad marriages is referred to as well

    • no

      your mom suck me good and hard through my jorts

      • quickshooter

        Go back to school kid

    • Mayo Lane

      Remember, baby boomers caused this. They lived the good life and in turn spoiled our quality of such with their bull by spoiling their own kids rotten too. As the saying goes;

      Hard times create strong men.
      Strong men create good times.
      Good times create weak men.
      And, weak men create hard times…

      We need to be more strict with gender norms with our new generations and assert boundaries when raising them.

    • John Doe

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/336b4ec77faa1c7f5ecf01dc4713e1e217a61f371dfe4c9c650059e5e324819b.jpg

      We could have been on the moon, or Mars. Mining for resources, bringing them back to Earth to build those gigantic beautiful skyscrapers we’ve always imagined…instead we’re fighting about who gets to use which fucking bathroom, if kids should be allowed to become trannies, letting foreigners ruin western countries with their backwards 3rd world savagery. I feel like we’ll need another world war or some kind of catastrophe for everything to go back to normal..tough times create strong men, and we’re living in the easiest times of all, no wonder soy boys are the norm.

      • Mexican Shitposting

        Imagine being this delusional

    • Paul Genovese

      Gay love is holy love <3

    • Marc T

      Your retarded jewish religion is showing.

  • En Chi

    Hebrews 13
    4 Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God
    will judge.

    If they would see the sad consequences of their sinful behaviour and their lasciviousness:
    Romans 1
    26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the
    natural use into that which is against nature:

    27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one
    toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in
    themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

    • TrueWOPR

      From the same faith that tells you to mutilate all boys at day 8, that life is not valid until 2 months out of the womb, and women are property.

      …So *mostly* wrong, but not entirely. ;P

      • Marfam

        funny of you to say mutilate… the choice of words is just like those of vegans that tell the average person that they’re eating a corpse. good job

        • TrueWOPR

          What would you call inflicting a violent and disfiguring injury upon an infant?

        • Nukefuzz

          It is literally the definition of the word “mutilation”. There is nothing disingenuous about it, you’re just an idiot.

      • A friend

        youre confusing judaism with christianity, christianity never advocated for anything remotely close to circumsizion or that women are property.

        • TrueWOPR

          That’s like saying I’m confusing the expansion pack with the base game – the latter literally can’t exist without being stacked on top of the former, with all the flaws that entails.

  • aphirst

    “In addition, 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent had between 501 and 1000 partners. A further 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent reported having had more than 1000 lifetime sexual partners.”

    Quoted directly from the source you site. Please don’t misquote it!

    • AAAAA

      isn’t misquoted. the source just mentions multiple studies.

      the 28% was a fairly accurate assessment pre-aids. more recent and relevant data i would agree, the median is about 3-4 times compared to heterosexuals

      • Garret Hughes

        The CARM source actually repeats the same 1978 study multiple times to pass it off as multiple sources. It doesn’t even matter about it being pre-aids. They didn’t use a representative sample, and relied on men rounded up from San Francisco bathhouses lol. The best sources are the General Social Survey, the NATSAL and ASHR all of which show a median of 10 to 20 sexual partners in lifetime. As you correctly point out, that probably is 3 to 4 times.

    • E S M

      http://www.academia.edu/24310251/A_comparative_demographic_and_sexual_profile_of_older_homosexually_active_men

      “There is no way of enumerating the population of homosexually active men. Participants were necessarily volunteers. Recruitment sources included sections of the organised gay community (radio, venues, gyms, businesses, publications); places of sexual contact within, outside, and marginal to organised gay communities (gay brothels, sex shops, beats, saunas); health centres frequented by gay men; and pornography outlets. Strategies for contacting potential respondents included standard advertising that emphasised he importance of research information, advertising with some sexual titillation, cards and fliers, stickers and posters, notices in Personals columns, and articles and interviews in the media”

      I feel like some of the studies cited have sampling issues that may throw their conclusions into question

  • Fantaman

    How the hell can you have this many partners?

    • E S M

      The source is from 1978 (read: before AIDS), and several of the studies quoted use nonrandom samples of Australian prostitutes

  • Jake

    Yes, because “ex-gay” Christian organizations a great source to justify your propaganda.

  • Kakurenjou

    Your so-called source is flawed and biased, and you should feel ashamed for having to stoop so low to perpetuate your vile opinions.

  • Divosa Uplanovytch

    homogamy

  • lots of gay men are getting married now that they are legally permitted to, which is excellent. a good cartoon

    • Stiffy Weiner

      no u

  • MrChaosAdam

    Im gay and this is 100% true. No other group is more full of degeneracy and moral nihilism as homosexuals. Even the ones living in relationships are having sex on the side. I want a gay cure that the leftwing has cruelly denied me. They want me to be enslaved by my base urges and vote for them so that they can “protect my interests”.
    Well fuck you! My interest is to be a good person who can find love, but you fucking devils poisoned our minds with hedonism and turned us into your vote-farm-animals. It and when it comes to blows I know who my enemies will be.

    • CMK

      Jesus Christ died for your sins on a cross and rose again after three days. You have committed evil deeds, as we all have done. God is a just judge, and must punish you for these sins, because he is perfect by his nature. But God loves you, does not want to punish you. This is why God took the form of a man, Jesus Christ, and died as a sacrifice for your sins on a cross. He was punished for your sins, so that you could be made righteous in God’s sight. After three days, Jesus rose again, because it is impossible for him to have been held down by death.

      This is great news! Repent, (that is, change your mind,) and believe the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and be saved from the judgement of God. God will reward you for your faith with eternal life, and forgiveness for your deeds. I sin, and you sin, and we both will continue to sin, but Jesus Christ died for these sins, and God is willing to forgive them. Please, repent, and believe the Gospel.

    • Tyler Thule

      MrChaosAdam I would say you really shouldn’t dedicate to ridding your sexuality but practicing sexual decency, you are disgusted by the thought of actually sleeping with 1000 partners right? refrain from hookup sites and look for someone of your race who is genuine and stick to them. if you can’t do that, you might just be promiscuous and that faults on you.

    • A friend

      A little advice from someone who knows what hes talking about, stay away from porn and dont masturbate. Trust me, after approximatively 1 to 2 months, your attraction to females will rise back up, its just that your darwinian instinct is getting screwed over because it thinks you actually mated many times before because you ejaculated.

      • Paul Genovese

        lol you don’t

        tried that buddy didn’t work

        • Nope

          Try harder than 15 minutes, as a furry you’re at the bottom of the degeneracy ladder so you gotta FIGHT harder on the way up. You can do it!

    • Paul Genovese

      Gay love is love <3

      • jjdub7

        Just remember your Truvada regimen, little one

    • Will Cummings

      Lol sure you are. Considering the surveys are non-random and from the 70’s, and surveyed a bunch of men who attended sex clubs and were prostitutes I find that laughable.

    • jjdub7

      You’re not gay if you don’t have an OnlyFans, Uncle Tom.

  • Fantaman

    Try to imagine how trash you have to be that your partner count is in the four digits

  • Smug Level: Zen Master

    Lol *links to Christian site promoting faith in a jew to change homos*
    You know they just killed fags in pre-christian Europe. If anyone saw any sort of homo activity they immediately dealt with it in brutal fashion.
    Christians: “We know you’ve spread AIDS and raped children, but please just see the light and accept Jesus.”

    • Anthony

      >you’ve spread AIDS

      you have the scientific knowledge of a kindergartner

      • Smug Level: Zen Master

        You’re a faggot.

        • Anthony

          i base my opinions and ideology on statistics and reality- you apparently do not. Why else would you be so hostile when I talk about reality?

          You’re nothing more than someone easily manipulable, plain and simple. Simple mind, simple responses.

          • A friend

            keep spreading aids you faggot. gotta keep that anal sex tradition going.

          • Paul Genovese

            lol your like, ten

    • Garret Hughes
      • Onsokumaru

        The claim is true for that place. And 50 is still a lot.

      • NOTaPLANT

        This should be enough to drive down gay promiscuity anyway

        What about STI rates?[edit]

        Medical professionals explain that higher rates of sexually transmitted infections are mostly due to the ease of transmission through anal sex, and number of sexual partners as the secondary factor. Anal sex transmits HIV at a rate 18 to 30 times higher than oral sex,[citation needed] thus it is much easier transmitted among gay men who engage in anal sex. A 2007 study explains that the majority of gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners annually as straight men and women, and that anal sex, not promiscuity, was the main contributing factor in rates of HIV transmission.[12] The study states that heterosexuals would need to have three times as many sexual partners as gay men in order to have an HIV epidemic. This is not to say that gay men on average, do not have more sexual partners, but rather it is not the main contributing factor. No doubt highly promiscuous men are much more susceptible for HIV transmission, but the bulk of transmission occurs due to pure biology.

  • Tyler Thule

    I don’t know one gay man that has ever met that many people but then again, I don’t like to associate with people who would be that promiscuous.

  • Zak Pikslime

    No way 28%

  • Garret Hughes

    Linked to an unrepresentative sample of sex club attendees from the 1970’s though?

    General social survey data from Chicago shows gay men had a median of 11 sexual partners between 2008 and 2018, which comprised 50,000 respondents of all orientations.

    The NATSAL-3 study in the UK showed gay men typically had 19 sexual partners in their life, with a third having less than 10, and about a quart had more than 50. The rest were in the low teens and twenties.

    The ASHR study in Australia of 25,000 people found gay men typically had 22 sexual partners in their life.

Primary Sidebar