Are you saying he would have dropped dead randomly on the street if the cops chose not to bother confronting him?

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/554ac212b78be1fe9668ab6d02a4c67f6a99338f41608c85ba074a8bdef4d71e.jpg

Nobody has bothered to prove the allegation that Floyd resisted arrest. The only evidence of this claim is the word of the police. None of the multiple video angles of the incident show any form of resistance from Floyd.

You’re making two contradictory statements. You claim it was the stress from being arrested in conjunction with his medical issues and intoxication that killed him (which directly implies it was the officer’s fault), while also claiming it was a coincidence that he died while being restrained. Pick one.

“Could have.” Yes he could have just randomly dropped dead, given his condition. But what’s more likely? That he just so happened to die at such a precise time to make it look like the police killed him? Or that it was actually the police that killed him? NOT BUYING IT. This is the exact same thing that happened to Tony Timpa, and Eric Garner. Positional asphyxia. Something that I’ve been trained to avoid inflicting upon people when restraining them, since I work private security. If I or any of my co-workers did anything even remotely resembling what those cops did, we’d be fired, sued, and imprisoned.

How about not being a gun grabbing government goon?

He started the chain events by HIS criminal actions and resisting arrest.

Counterfeit, theft, and attempting to drive a vehicle while heavily intoxicated.

“The person at the shop, whose name is redacted, claimed they asked Floyd to return cigarettes that he purchased with the allegedly fake $20 bill. Floyd refused and was “awfully drunk”

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/06/happened-day-george-floyd-died-police-custody-200602162316383.html

“called police on Floyd after the bill he used to buy a pack of cigarettes was flagged by a money-counting machine as potentially counterfeit.”

https://www.insideedition.com/george-floyd-was-a-regular-at-store-that-called-911-and-may-not-have-known-bill-was-possibly-fake

Why do you assume I even watch the MSM, let alone listen to them?

Also you have yet to prove that he was resisting arrest. If he was resisting arrest, the police would have released the bodycam footage immediately.

oh no dood, not the tobacco

Ah so lower standards for government agents than for civilians, is it?

1. Citizens arrest is a thing. You might have heard it discussed during the Amau… Whatever tf his name is. Sounds like Armed Robbery.

2. Floyd never attacked the police.

3. They did not have to actively restrain him, since we have absolutely zero evidence of any form of active or passive resistance from Floyd.

1. If civilians attempted a citizens arrest and did what that officer did, they’d be behind bars.

2. And the officer had almost 20 complaints filed against him in the past. But neither of those facts are actually relevant to the case.

3. You doubt there’s no evidence of him resisting arrest? Well you know what to do.

The armed robbery is relevant and cops are infallible get fucked 🙂

1. Their actions caused his death. Arguing the nonsense that he’d of dropped dead anyway if the police didn’t pile on top of him just shows that you’re either dishonest or dumb.

2. Then it must follow that every other cop in that department had a ton of complaints against them. They don’t. You are essentially arguing that police can do no wrong.

3. That’s not how the burden of proof works. Also he was handcuffed. Stop lying.

1. Positional asphyxia. If you knew anything about use of force training, you’d know about it. Three people piling on top of a single person can do that.

2. Those other cops don’t have a ton of complaints against them. Perhaps the department would receive less complains if they stopped acting like thugs.

3. You lied and claimed he was not handcuffed. You lied and said he died of a drug overdose. You lied and said the restraining methods never put him in danger. You have repeatedly discredited yourself with your lies and shifting the burden of proof. No different than a leftist.

1. He died of cardiac arrest. Do you know what a big contributing factor to cardiac arrest is? Stress and asphyxia.

2. Contradictory how?

3. You implied he was not handcuffed. That was false. You accused him of resisting arrest with no evidence. You just lied again and claimed I accused the cop of murder. The burden of proof is on YOU and I have yet to see a state worshipping cuck such as yourself argue your points without lying, shifting the burden or proof, or special pleading. You have no credibility, and have everything in common with defenders of antifa. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d23ee7d6125ea5a3810d3a58cc917f24e5276e1c617c6ad46c6c5cd82123a772.jpg

1. You’re denying the medical reports, are you?

2. Explain.

3. Projection.

“no u” That all you got?

Why are you saying he did not resist arrest and at the same time say there is no proof? Lol

Except not because by saying that he did not resist you imply that the policemen is guilty and so without proof you claim that he acted wrongfully the only right claim would be that we don’t know whether he resisted or not and so can not make a proper judgment on it

but hey don’t let that cognitive dissonance stop you

that’s a wrong comparison

much more accurate would be a bar fight where both claim the other started the fight, so we tread it as he said she said

or how about a violent police arrest where the police claim the criminal attacked them while the criminal claims the police attacked him

They’re the police. It’s their job to confront criminals.

Straw man arguments are weak.

Except for cops when Rastus and Dayshawn are running amok. Cops are guilty until proven innocent, especially white cops, who are guilty even after being proven innocent.

I’m talking about when Africans-in-America run amok and the cop who shows up is white.

All of these riots are well organized and well funded, by (((the usual suspects))), and the specific instances chosen as pretexts for the phony outrage machine are all carefully chosen to satisfy The Narrative even as even cursory examination–which Africans-in-America are disinclined to attempt, once they’ve been told something is Whitey’s fault, not that more than one in fifty of them has the cognitive wherewithal for this kind of thing even if they had the inclination–demonstrates that it’s all lies, all the way down, from Michael Brown to Rodney King. Note that it’s also always an election year when (((they))) foment riots and insurrection to discourage white cops from dealing appropriately with monkeyshines.

The objective is to end even the pretext of public order or safety and make America ungovernable and its cities unlivable, because this destroys cultural capital and the first duty of the Party Vanguard is always to destroy cultural capital by any means necessary. “The masses” will not consent to The Revolution until the last vestige of the old order is burned to ash before their eyes while they are forced to watch, or so goes Gramsci’s theory.

I couldn’t care less about Floyd. He’s not one of my tribe, not one of my people. He’s not even interesting to me. I will make the observation, however, having seen a number of these non-incidents blown up into nationwide and worldwide news by the (((newsmedia))), almost always, by some mysterious coincidence, in election years, that sooner or later we always find out that the film was creatively edited with the specific intention of causing riots and mobilizing “de culluhd people vote” when election day comes.

One autopsy says it’s murder, one says it’s a drug overdose. One commentator says “muh homey din du nuffin,” one says he got caught passing counterfeit money then swallowed his stash and resisted arrest. I will not be the least bit surprised if tomorrow MiniTru tells us that George Floyd died of COVID19. Or that he’s still alive. Or that he was white. Or that he never existed. Whatever is useful for pushing today’s Narrative.

Ever read Orwell? “Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” Look out the window. We’re living it.

In any event, as a general rule my assumption, when some African-in-America runs amok and gets goodified by the cops, is that he had it coming, if not for what he was doing five seconds prior that the carefully edited footage shown on the “news” does not show, then for any of his prior twenty-eight violent felonies, any one of which would have gotten him a date with the hangman a century ago. He was a flea on the back of a dog run over by a drunken teenager who was upset that his girlfriend gave him the clap. I shrug and go on with my day. I am concerned about what the cops do to people who are White like me, like Daniel Shaver, like Justine Damond. A team of theoretical mathematicians at MIT are still researching the concept of numbers small enough to express the quantity of damn I give for George Floyd and all his kind.

To be entirely fair, if we still had the Common Law in this country, Floyd’s first violent felony in 1998 would have resulted in the death penalty for him. There would have been a gallows right beside the courthouse. He’d have been hanged by the neck until dead at high noon the day after conviction–or the same day, if the jury returned a verdict before noon–and none of his subsequent violent crimes would have happened. And no one would ever have heard of him.