Skip to content


The lines ‘leftist’ scum and their ilk will never cross.

Modern leftist scum you mean. Dudes like Marx and Stalin didn’t give a shit if they were kikes, if you were a capitalist, you were dead.

I’m not going to be hateful, I’m just going to provide context.
It’s true that the wealthiest 1% of the population control a significant amount of the country’s wealth. Progressives find this undesirable because the majority of the US population is living paycheck-to-paycheck, thousands of people die because they can’t afford medicine every year, intelligent people fail to reach their potential because of they can’t afford tuition and student loans, and cheapness is leading to outsourcing of jobs and reliance on unsustainable energy sources.
This has nothing to do with the success of the Jewish culture. It is and always has been a part of Jewish culture to be good with money and business. Jews have made incredible contributions to the world, with great individuals such as Albert Einstein. If anything, we should be happy to have such productive people in our country. This doesn’t exempt them from our unhappiness with wealth disparity, not by any means. The two ideas are completely unconnected, one is about economics and the other about cultural groups.
To say the leftists are scum because they want liberty of all people regardless of parts of their person they didn’t choose, and that they want equality for equal opportunity for success to achieve the ideal meritocracy capitalism exists to create simply doesn’t make sense.
Side note: I personally am not politically affiliated, I vote based on the individual. Also, democratic leftism advocating equal freedom and opportunity is in no way the same thing as marxist-leninist dictatorship of the proletariat with it’s centrally planned economy. Social liberals only want to optimize capitalism in a way so that it actually creates the ideal society that it could.

You’re literally paid to post here. Every word you have ever said in every thread is a proven hoax. No one will believe a word you say. Don’t post again.

You can’t just say everything I say is a proven hoax with no references or actual proof.
Person 1: This is the reality of the situation because *multitude of factual statements laid out clearly*
Person 2: you lyin, da joos paid you off

You’re so afraid of reasonable arguments against your beliefs that you think someone paid some random guy on the internet to argue with a handful of nazis. Nothing is gained from this, the only point is that I get experience in debate. Find me one person who was actually paid to do what I’m doing. I’ll wait.

so some people worked harder than others? as long as they aren’t white it’s alright.
white people have not worked for literally anything. it has all been given to them all their lives.

didnt you say you were jewish before?

yeah, i’m jewish not white
it wasn’t given to me we took it from you.

Hahaha, Classic left ideology. Because a skin colour determines the molecular correctness, fantasies and acts of life. I had a hella hard time growing up and im white. This man has the thinking skills and mentality of a Jewish priest. Go give some kids aids, your kind are fucken sick and your religious practices are for the benefit to take days of work, It’s a big scam like Christianity but Christianity was for the socialist concept. This is what we call ladies and gentleman genetic fallacy. Behold the biggest fuckhead and entitled incel of 2019.

>white people have not worked for literally anything. it has all been given to them all their lives.

Do you even know what a serf is? What a “Leibeigener” is? A peasant under a king?

The vast majority of ‘whites’ were basically slave caste and they still are apex.

Only difference is that serfs from back then could buy themselves free and become literally Free men, Freiherren.

Can’t do that today, not even jews can do that, other jews ruined that for the common jew, too.
It’s just that ALL jews are surplus to requirement to the world, to white people, so there literally is not a single reason to keep any jew around.

Evidently I’m an idiot and can’t pick up on the subtlety of this. Can someone break this down for a dumb dumb like me? Why is the protester nervous that 2% are 40% of billionaires?

Conquer the bread, conservatives bitch about capitalism too, when it’s inconvient to them

a nation’s ideals and fantasies can be observed by looking at the iconography put on their flags; empires and regencies display dragons, unicorns, griffons, golden lions and other such beasts of myth and high power in an attempt to attain their might. communist regimes display full wheat fields and peasant labour tools in an attempt to get their dysfunctional and poorly maintained farms to work properly for once.

The Soviet Russia was just a hyped up company town, with hierchies

White slave owners raped Black women, that’s African American have lighter skin than regular Africans

Piss on Robert Lee

>White slave owners

The ‘greatest instance of antisemitism in America’ was the trial and hanging of the jew Leo Frank after a whole white jury, judge, persecution, police force believed the words of two black men over an incredibly infuentlial jew and an all star jewish defense on the case of the jew trying to pin his murder rape of a little white girl on a black worker by blackmailing, heh, another.

This one single jew getting rightfully hanged had so much of a splashback that the ADL of Bnai Brith was formed.
Yeah, Leo Frank of Bnai Brith. His hanging led to the creation of the ADL, the anti defamation league that has done nothing but race bait whitey against blacky ever since.

But one day blacks will learn to distinguish whites from semites, and then the jews will have lost their greatest bioweapon.

Black owned slaves outnumbered white slave owners for a time. A black man at one point had the most slaves in the southern USA for a time.

re-read history, not the shit they taught you in middle school, faggot.

Alt Right hates liberty and freedom, and are Putin’s whores

“Muh Russia”

Conquer the Bread comrade

Also Stalin was a traitor to the workers

Workers are pretty dumb, we’re all about Dictators, Plebeians, Patricians and such over here.

*eats food* sorry I couldn’t hear you over the tidal wave of retarded shit that just poured out of you, turns out, bankers aren’t the problem, corrupt bankers are the problem, and since communism tends to elevate the most corrupt retards in society it’s not an issue you’ll be rid of with a revolution based entirely on “hurr durr you have more shit than me ergo you are the devil”

The system is broken not certain people, there will always be corrupt bankers, bad presidents, and terrible ceos

Also Lenists Tankies are essentially capitalists, running states like company towns as class traitors

I’m an anarcho commie, so I for a system that prevents your worries of corruptions, by supporting an egalatarian society with direct democracy, and no major leadership

Representative government has failed, and your only happy with hiercharies because you can shit on others… though with a white enthno state with robots controlled by the rich, you would be the new n****r

Anyway, watch and maybe complain at me about this essay of how conservative thinks

There’s literally no such thing as an anarcho-communist though, I sympathize with the idea that the system is broken, but abandoning it for an ideal in which everyone just magically works together without any incentivization to do so other than the sharing of labor in a world this full of douche bags is naive at best and dangerous at worst.

That’s not what I said, I said that your plan is flawed to the point of childish fantasy, not that no desirable alternative exists or that I prefer the status quo over the idea of changing for the better, but your idea of better and mine likely aren’t even related, so it probably wouldn’t help for us to butt heads or try and hash it out since the best case scenario for either of us is that the other isn’t around anymore.

This guy’s videos are such shit. Notice how he never actually provides any examples or speaks to anybody directly. I can sum up every single one of his videos right now:

Everyone who disagrees with me is part of some monolithic enemy. If two people disagree with each other, but both disagree, they are both wrong, because it is really the same entity making two contradicting arguments to try to trick me into debating with them. So I win. The end.

Not even the uncontacted Amazonian tribes have direct democracy, much less lack of leadership. Stupid Rousseau, keeps poisoning minds.

About robots, well just tax luxury robots, have the state take some utilities from industrial ones to fund jobs and rehab… and not much else is needed to make them fit in, IF these robots ever appear and come out as powerful as they can be (fueling remains a problem) while remaning obedient.

That may take a while, though even with current tech trends then maybe 30% of jobs will be automatized in the coming 30 years. So to be honest, maybe some robots should and will be banned (warbots, maybe some sexbots in extreme dwindling society cases), while many humans will have to go stay behind in earlier stages and away from cosmopolitan areas. These humans would be provided for hopefully, as less superfluous tech will not distract from breeding, while enough tech will remain to avoid reverting fully to bronze age…

Other basic robots, however, will be as inevitable as the computers and internet you are ironically blathering on about “anarchy”. It’s hilarious, how anarchists love to piss on religion, then proceed to be worse utopianists.

VR will probably be first, easier than moving robot anatomies. I can imagine troublesome prisoners (mental, political) being confined to VR sets forever, attached to a tube. The Matrix-WallE scenarios, coming closer. Maybe like you say, the rich will stop annoying the rest when they finally lift off into VR world; as long as this reality-based rest of the populace can separate from them and be taken care of, may even work. Though again, many of these new techs seem self-defeating, specially considering the relative lack of breeding from the people who produce them and use them (sex VR will be addictive).

At any rate, this is why populist rightwingers don’t believe in the free market as much as you think, and prefer supervised collaborationism rather than vapid elitism. Natural hierarchies are supposed to care for bottom rungs before the whole thing collapses.

I have no idea if that figure is correct (assuming it refers to Jews, reading the discussion here), but if so what difference does it make? If we confiscate their property Lenin-style, we will do it whether they are Jews or not. If we go along a more moderate social democratic route, raising taxes on corporations, capital gains, large inheritances and so on, expand welfare systems, and support unionization so wages can take back a larger share from profits, it will hit Jew billionaires just like other billionaires. Of course it shouldn´t be taboo to mention that the percentage of super-rich that is Jews, just like the percentage that is White, but it is not the most important point.

Despite being 2%

Videogames actually correlate with violent kids, but there’s no proof it causes violence. However, there’s proof it causes depression, with the proper controls. The reason the “videogames cause violence” studies aren’t reliable is because they don’t have controls for people who haven’t played videogames and then become violent. They couldn’t prove non-gamers turned violent after playing. However, they did prove gamers and non-gamers became more depressed after games. (This doesn’t have to do with addiction, just the after-effect of videogames)

Pedophilia on the other hand works on a sexual circuit, which gradually becomes more desensitized the more often it’s used. You have to create more and more of a taboo fetish because the norm won’t do it for you. It creates an “itch” that gets harder and harder to scratch the more you expose yourself to sexually-stimulating images. It makes people more impulsive, more disgusted with themselves on an individual level, more fearful of neighbors and friends getting close, less sensitive to real sex, it can destroy your serotonin gauge which is your psychological reward system, making you feel less rewarded by real accomplishments, and more jaded by life.

TLDR: These are 2 completely different brain circuits that work 2 completely different ways. Shock value doesn’t make create an itch for greater and greater shock value. Sexual stimulation does.

That contradicts the recent studies that say television and social media causes depression but video games make people less depressed. I think it depends on the type of video game you play. Online multiplayer can definitely make you depressed fast if you are repeatedly doing poorly. A lot of games have the opposite effect and I’ve actually played video games before job interviews to boost my confidence and attitude.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar