Skip to content
  • 12judges

    They hate that. Absolutely hate it. That’s because the heterosexual family unit – especially the white version – was and still is the gold standard when it comes to relationships. They know this. They can’t stand it.

    The successful heterosexual family unit is a constant reminder of their personal failures or the reminder that they are in many cases simply not built to achieve it.

    Anyone who pushes the ‘love wins’ message seethes with hate.

    • Alistair Grove

      White version? How do ‘whites’ do things differently than any other monogamous culture/ethnicity? Also, you do know there are differences between American Republican families and, say, Romanian families? Or do you think that Romanians aren’t white?

      • Doctor Mayhem

        Kill yourself, [email protected]

        • Alistair Grove

          You first, Fucktard.

          • Logshaman

            Dude, don’t stoop to the level of children who resort to petty name-calling

          • Doctor Mayhem

            When dealing with children, you gotta communicate in a language they understand. Try drinking bleach.

          • Logshaman

            No thanks, I prefer milk

          • Doctor Mayhem

            I love milk. The official drink of White Supremacy.

          • Logshaman

            It is healthy bone juice

          • Zack Wagoner

            It can be a little too spicy at times.

          • Jesher

            Kek

          • Alistair Grove

            Why? It’s fun to lower yourself, sometimes.

            Also, why insult children by comparing them to this moron?

        • Jesher

          Dick.

      • Logshaman

        I think they are talking about the nuclear family concept

        • Alistair Grove

          I know that. I’m just pointing out it isn’t a white only thing. Even black americans used to do it.

          • Logshaman

            Yes, I know that too

          • TrueWOPR

            But they don’t do it commonly is the point.

          • Alistair Grove

            Now they don’t. But whites are catching them up on that front. 40% white babies are born to single mothers, approximately.

          • TrueWOPR

            in a 72% white nation.
            This means whites are nearly half as likely to be single parents than their demographic should represent.

          • Alistair Grove

            Yes, but the numbers are rising. It’s a growing problem, like it was with the American black community until it hit critical mass.

            The point I’m making is you can’t just dismiss it as ‘a black thing’ because the Marxists won’t stop at just that community. They destroy community after community until the West collapses. Then the Muslim will probably take over, as at least they’re resisting that BS. At least for now.

          • Jesher

            You make some good points. You want to see the best in blacks, as do I.

            But I’m still convinced that genetics do play a big factor in racial cultural differences. But to what extent?

            In any case, the human brain (especially the neocortex) is HIGHLY malleable. Most instincts can be overcome in that regard; plus new studies show that your DNA changes as you develop in life, so that a child you have when older will have different genes than a child had young.

            I certainly am willing to believe Africans (and whites) can be fixed up again.

          • Alistair Grove

            I hope so. I really do. Though I imagine it’ll take a lot of pain.

      • Rik Van Der Meer

        For starters, the vast majority of American nigger babies are born out of wedlock. The same is not true for American white babies.

        • Alistair Grove

          Yes, it’s an American problem. That was my point. In other parts of the world it’s different.

          Also, more and more white babies in the West are being born to single mothers. 40% I believe. So it’s not a racial characteristic. The black American community was just targeted first.

          • Jesher

            Well, if it weren’t for deliberate cultural sabotage, wouldn’t that stat for white people be a lot lower?

            Meanwhile I’m not sure if Africans have historically had the same concept of marriage as we do. Maybe American blacks practiced marriage before Marxism, but I don’t really know. I do know that, culturally, they have a much greater emphasis on sex than love.

            God this whole subject of debate is such a mess. It’s so hard to say what is what when EVERYONE has been sabotaged so deeply this last century (or so).

          • Alistair Grove

            Black Americans had good families until the sixties, I think. The democrats fucked them with changing to the benefits system. They made it profitable for single mothers to exist, thus single mothers become more common.

            As for African families, well, that depends on the tribe/country.

      • TCC

        Unlike black children, most white children are born from married parents.
        Unlike hispanic couples, most white couples don’t have more children than they can afford.

        Little things.

        • Alistair Grove

          Not anymore, whites are catching up to blacks when it comes to single mothers.
          And poor white families have always had loads of children, so again, not a racial thing.

          Your bourgeoisie bigotry is showing.

          P.S. No, I’m not a communist. I just like that word.

          • TCC

            First of all, notice how I said “most”. Even if they’re catching up, slightly, most black children are born to single mothers, while a minority of white children are born to single mothers.
            https://whyy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Screen-Shot-2018-11-13-at-10.34.52-AM.png

            Second, what does being “bourgeoisie” have to do with anything? I’m not rich, nor do I give preferential treatment to the rich.

          • Alistair Grove

            And I’m pointing out it’s not a race thing. As in, it’s not caused by inherent genetic characteristics. It’s a culture thing. The black American community got fucked over by the Marxists first, that’s all.

            And I called you bourgeois because you assumed the middle class was the white standard, thus ignoring the rural poor, which are mostly white.

          • TCC

            Culture partially stems from race. Upbringing is important, sure, but racial groups have genetic factors that lead to differences in IQ, time preference, neurotransmitters, hormones, and so forth. Marxism, as history demonstrates, can fuck over any cultural or racial group at any time, but there’s no denying biological reality.

          • Alistair Grove

            True. And the reasons you listed may be why the black community succumbed first. However, that’s beside the point. We are talking about lack of family values. These aren’t a racial problem, they’re a Marxist problem. So even if blacks are more vulnerable to that infection doesn’t men it’s inherent to them.

          • TCC

            That’s debatable, but with a large of truth in there.
            If you’ve ever seen how the average African family lives and operates, you know they’ve always been behind. Hence why their countries starve ceaselessly and they’re never, ever going to enjoy a first-world economy.

          • Alistair Grove

            Well that’s were you’re wrong. Many African countries are now thriving because of Capitalism, to the point they now have an obesity crisis.

          • TCC

            They only thrive in comparison to their neighbors.
            Having an obesity crisis doesn’t equate to being first world.

          • Alistair Grove

            But they’re getting there. That’s my point. They can be civilised.

          • TCC

            Doubtful.
            Africa used to be a much more prosperous place than it is now. Ivory Coast used to be a thriving cash crop economy, Zimbabwe used to be the breadbasket of southern Africa, and the Congo used to be a powerhouse of minerals.

            Now? Their economies have crashed, and have to recover. The only reason they got to be so powerful was via European colonization, and when they decided they didn’t wanted to be ruled by foreigners, they permanently crippled themselves.
            They could do better, sure, but they’re never going to be as strong as their European neighbors, unless they opt to be directly controlled by Europeans.

          • Alistair Grove

            Those countries collapsed because of Marxism and I already acknowledged that it’s possible black people are more vulnerable to that.

            And Africa did have its mighty empires. The Zulus for example. The British only beat them because of technology.

          • Jesher

            I don’t know how to articulate this, but maybe a prosperous African society isn’t supposed to look like a prosperous European society?

            I really wish the west didn’t try to civilize or colonize them, or accept slaves or trade with them, until they got themselves sorted.

            Northern Africa has developed civilization on its own, no? I think it would have been better to slowly let northern African civilization trickle down and symbiotically mesh with the rest of Africa, than the godless hellhole it stumbled into forming today.

          • Jesher

            I have my doubts like the other guy, but I’ve seen blacks and black families really shine. I want to have hope for them overall, even if prospects can be grim.

            I would definitely prefer a world where blacks do well, than a world where they do poorly. Once my prejudices are no longer justified, I will gladly abandon them.

          • free_peach

            You think that the reason is capitalism, but the real reason is capitagibs. There is too much welfare going into those countries and few good results. Mostly resulting in exploitation of the whole welfare system. There is a lot of examples like Zimbabwe, where they have deplatformed white farmers, only to have their agriculture crippled to the point of having to pay reparations and asking them to come back. It is a painstacking reality and a tough pill to swallow, but you have to do it sooner or later.

          • Nuke Mecha

            I’m skeptical (not that Marxism doesn’t help things be worse but) because African mating patterns are such that “husbands” act as pimps, extracting value from a woman that works for him and while sleeping and having children with other men, thus the most important male kin for children is not the father, who we cannot be sure corresponds to the “husband” anyway, but the uncle.

            I recommend F. Roger Devlin’s Sexual Utopia in Power, which traces a parallel between “modern” dating in Western societies compared to African mating patterns in one of its chapters.

          • Alistair Grove

            As I haven’t read that book, I’ll take your word for it.

          • Jesher

            This. Affluent blacks have comparable IQ and crime statistics to the poorest of whites.

            And it genuinely pains me, I don’t pick on blacks for being black. Sabotage was a huge factor.

          • Jesher

            I definitely agree with you that blacks got fucked by Marxist-esque demoralization first, AND HARD (thanks CIA, thanks Democrats, thanks Marxist diaspora Jews, thanks Satanists), but where I disagree is thinking that genetics do not play a huge factor.

            Distinct racial differences have been noted by countless peoples all throughout the ages.

            But yeah, blacks have a lot of potential, and they got fucked with hard. It’s just not due to white people like leftists think.

          • Alistair Grove

            I didn’t say genetics mean nothing. Only that they ain’t the only thing. How much they play is open to debate, though.

            And I completely agree with your last point.

          • George Emery

            Wait, unmarried mothers.
            That can also include cohabiting partners who are planning on getting married or have no intention of getting married but plan on sticking together. This is a non-sequitur.

          • TCC

            If you’re not legally married, you’re starting out with a rocky foundation upon which to establish a family.

            Legally, custody either becomes extremely completely complicated or one-sided in the mother’s favor. An unmarried mother, committed to her lover or not, has full legal rights to take her children away from their father to never be seen again.

            Whether your partner is there or not doesn’t take away the fact that it’s extremely irresponsible to have children out of wedlock.

          • Brandon

            Where do all the white women having black babies fall into this?

          • TCC

            I don’t think the law switches based on race, but considering social trends, they fit into the categories of “likely to be abandoned by their baby-daddies” and “likely to be divorced”.

          • Jesher

            “Catching up means they’re just as bad!!!”

            Meanwhile it took 100 years of Marxist demoralization to budge white people toward being 1/2 as degenerate as the rest.

            Though I agree, a good Mexican family is a good Mexican family, same with Asians. A good family is a good family. It’s hardly a white people thing exclusively. His point would have gone farther without the race angle. I personally know more stable, loving, devout Korean families, than I do of any other race.

          • Alistair Grove

            There you go then. It’s all very good to say that whites are better than blacks because of X. But if you do that, then you need to acknowledge that asians are better than whites for the same X.

      • Tamás Polgár

        Romanians are white, walnut! But if you mean Romanian Gypsies, those are retarded apes, unable to comprehend the fundamental idea of civilization.

        • Alistair Grove

          They still have stable families, though. So there’s obvious some parts of civilisation they like.

        • Nuke Mecha

          Actual Romanians hate the Roma almost as much as TPTH hate goyim.

    • Holyphonic

      Not sure why my comment got deleted, but I’ll say it again:

      The rage you talk about and homosexuals insistence on emulating the lives straight people inherently have — by wanting to get married and adopt other people’s children to raise — proves that they are dissatisfied with the consequence of being homosexual. They seem to realize that whatever meaning they squeeze out of their relationships is nothing to procreation and monogamy; which they are incapable of.

      That dissatisfaction and emulation makes a strong case against the claim that homosexuality is as “natural” as heterosexuality. I think that gets their goat more than anything.

  • Matt

    It’s almost as if libtards don’t hate heterosexuality. Just because you cunts are disingenuous about your beliefs doesn’t mean everyone is.

    • Alistair Grove

      Did you mean to put that “Don’t” in there?

      • Matt

        Yes?

      • Matt

        I’m sorry but I can’t take anyone who unironically uses breitbart as a source seriously.

        • Allison Kaas

          he’s right retard

          • Matt

            Can’t argue with that.

          • You are Not a Victim

            Your head cannot possibly get further up your ass.

        • TrueWOPR

          What if it’s NBC?

        • I’m sorry, but I can’t take Leftist bigots who disregard facts seriously.

          • Matt

            The word ‘facts’ doesn’t deserve to be anywhere near a shitebart article

          • Braden Fitzgerald

            https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/ Haha yes facts. A single article on a site that is 80% ads. Your facts are irrefutable :^)

        • Nuke Mecha

          I dislike kikebart as much as you, buddy, but are you seriously predicating NBC actually claiming “heterosexuality is just not working” on whether or not it was published on kikebart?

          Cause that’s some retarded shit

          • Matt

            I mean yeah I’m gonna doubt a fascist site by default, and I know they’ll take anything out of context if it suits their needs. If you look at the NBC’s actual article, they say that Heterosexuality doesn’t work as the status quo. The idea that a woman is only useful for making babies, and that heterosexuality can sometimes lead to negative things. But even if you want to interpret this article as hating on heterosexuals, one article is not the same as centuries of oppression and hate. Idk why you guys love anecdotes so much, but you should stop it, it’s pretty retarded.

  • Fantaman

    There is nothing loving about the LGBT crowd. You will find hate like you will never believe.

    • Zack Wagoner

      How dare they hate your hate?

      • TCC

        “Being heterosexual and wanting/having a family is being hateful”
        lol

  • QuickshooterMk2

    oh shit, how will fag brigade respond now?

  • Albionic American

    I know about a 29 year old male virgin who married his first cousin, and they had ten children together, despite their late start.

    And no, these people don’t live in the Ozarks, Appalachia or some other rural part of the United States; and they don’t star in a reality series on cable. I refer to Charles and Emma Darwin.

    You have to wonder why the self-proclaimed Woke people who claim to admire Charles Darwin so much would implicitly despise his personal example of sexual self-discipline and traditional family life.

    • Nuke Mecha

      Because in our post-modern age “love” has been defined as cumming in or on top of something.

      And I wrote “something” because it doesn’t even have to necessarily be another person.

    • Zimriel

      Darwin himself realised what a mistake he’d made when so many of his kids ended up sickly or duds. He wrote as much.

  • Albionic American

    I remain skeptical about our tech billionaires’ fantasies of colonizing Mars. But it you wanted to try that with the best chances of success, you would in advance try to eliminate as many preventable sources of failure as possible. Which means that you would select your Mars settlers from a population of competent, conservative white people with normal sexuality, like the ones in the middle panel of the cartoon. Because the alternative based on Woke ideology would create disaster. Yeah, send feminists, gays, transgenders, blacks, Hispanics, Pacific Islanders, Muslims, furries and other specimens of dysfunctional humanity to your Mars colony. What could possibly go wrong?

    • Io Non Esisto

      >What could possibly go wrong?
      Everything. That’s why you send them first to pave the road to colonization, then we send the actual colonizers.

  • what’s the straw budget on these comics, rockchuck?

    • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

      More than you’ll ever make, faggot.

  • Mister Twister

    Sir, are you suggesting ghey people are incapable of love?

  • TCC

    That’s the only thing you could be attacking. The other accusations you idiots tend to make turn out to be total bullshit.

    • Zack Wagoner

      *looks at stonetoss commenters wailing about fags, negroes, and wetbacks*
      You’re right, I couldn’t possibly be talking about that.

      • TCC

        So it’s okay to aggress against white people and heterosexuals, but not okay to return fire?

        This is why your side is losing. “It’s for me, but not for thee”, and everyone can see it.

  • TCC

    “oppression by minorities”
    Read up on the rate of black-on-white violence, as opposed to vice versa. White people are usually very civil, and black people aren’t. Try pointing that out in public and see what happens.

    They’re reacting to whiny douches?
    Is that why they flip their shit like “It’s Okay To Be White” posters?
    Because that’s SUCH a scathing attack on nonwhites, the idea that white people are “meh” tier.

    • Zack Wagoner

      *dismissive wanking gesture*

      • TCC

        If that’s all you can do, I rest my case. lol

        • Zack Wagoner

          Poor white straight man, people saying mean words to him; it’s like slavery/the Holocaust/systemic violence and disenfranchisement all in one. *dismissive farting noises*

          • TCC

            “Bad shit happening to someone else in the past means that the bad shit happening to you, in the present, is unimportant and should be ignored.”
            lol, brilliant.

            Also, if you think slavery, systemic violence, and disenfranchisement are exclusively caused by white people, or that white people are exempt from experiencing such things, I some very bad news for you… the first bit of which is that you’re painfully stupid when it comes to human history.

          • Zack Wagoner

            The bad shit being gays and POC asking to be treated equally. You poor dear *pat pat*

          • TCC

            Once again, read up on the rate of black-on-white violence in America (especially rape) as opposed to vice versa.
            Then, if you’re white, try publicly talking about it, and see what happens.

            The rates are hardly “equal”, and neither is the reaction.

  • TCC

    I get most of my information from victimization surveys.

    But you’ll never read them, because in your mind, non-whites never do anything wrong and “statistics” is another word for “rape”.

  • Logshaman

    You say that, but everyone oppressed everyone, what is even worse is that you can’t see that calling people white/black/asian is very ignorant in this context as it discredits the fact that even white people were racist against white people, etc etc…

  • Logshaman

    Dude, look at how homosexuality is looked in about any of the most popular religions

  • Jesher

    Fake history pushed by Marxists trying to stoke revolution against every pillar of society they possibly can, as outlined by Marx himself and more recently Saul Alinsky.

  • Miri <3

    Okay I’m genuinely confused. Is this supposed to mean people who believe in love don’t like people who are American Christians? That they’re confused by them? Is this somehow implying gay people don’t believe Christians exist? Is that face in the last panel supposed to be an expression of confusion or disgust or exasperation or exhaustion or curiosity or awe or what? I have so many questions and I lowkey dread the answer but I really just can’t help but ask. Like what the literal heck is happening here???

  • Lord Manatee

    What’s your ifunny account lol?

  • NemesisLeon

    Go be gay, just don’t hate on hetero families for no reason lol. And no point hating on gays either.

  • Tyler Thule

    imagine being this hypocritical to the very words you like to say… to not be happy when a fully functional white family is happily spending time together… how it could disturb you.

Primary Sidebar