Skip to content
  • Twilk9

    Damn dude, who broke your heart

    • A Snake With Bread

      this is supposed to be about ted

      • Twilk9

        “Supposed” to be

        But hes got an awful lot of comics about how women always go for someone else. Makes me wonder who broke his heart

        • A Snake With Bread

          Oh yeah this and one other. Absolutely flawless

    • Anon

      Ted did, duh. He’s so dreamy.

  • Thadrien

    Because he was super mega hyper handsome and masculine.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/43818b06de0ef83f5c08a617e136b6eb13570ec016bde8f1734b347aa2160dd3.jpg

    Like, imagine, you’re lying there on your bed and you heard a weird sound but you’re too lazy to get up so you fall asleep, and the next sensation that you feel is a strong man, with strong hands, choking the life out of you, screaming how much of a slut you are and how he wants the light of your eyes to go away as he puts a face of orgasmic pleasure, so he keeps putting more and more presure on your body, rubbing his boner against you as he keeps squeezing your pathetic neck, and next, right after the final gasp comes out of your mind, a big wet blob of drool drips off his teeth and just, plurp, falls right onto your popped out eye ball.

    Damn I wish he was my boyfriend, we could kill all women in the world together and have romantic sex after.

    • PolySaken

      Bruh moment

    • A Snake With Bread

      you forgot to /s your post

      • Thadrien

        I wasn’t being sarcastic.

        • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

          Oh your time will come, tranny faggot; rest assured.

          • Thadrien

            My time for what? Get a dental plan?

          • free_peach

            The time to get a dental plan is long gone, I feel we are getting near the ashtray time.

          • Thadrien

            I don’t like ashtray I hate smokes, I love them in noir movies though and it looks so cool and manly and badass but ugh I would never smoke or be near a cigarrete because that’s like just suicidal and i’m not a straight white man or a tranny so I don’t have suicidal tendencies.

          • free_peach

            You missed the point, but you already know that bot.

          • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

            That assumes you will survive the purge; don’t bother.

          • Thadrien

            What purge?

          • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

            The one that will end with your demise.

          • Thadrien

            Oh, when is it happening?

    • Paul Genovese

      I haven’t seen anyone calling for the killing of trans people here

      Also, keep your fetishes to yourself

    • lol

    • Albionic American

      If white American men could own Negro slaves again like many of our forefathers who helped to found this country, they could easily attract white women who want to marry them and bear their children, regardless of how they look. Racism promotes white people’s flourishing.

      • Meme Lord

        1) This has fuck-all to do with literally any of the above.
        2) No no no no no no NO. I cannot believe that people like you who believe that slavery was in any shape or form actually beneficial to the white race. If the Negro race had been left in Africa, so many of America’s problems would cease to exist. I heavily recommend reading this article from American Renaissance for more information: https://www.amren.com/news/2019/08/race-and-the-south-civil-war-history-slavery/

        “Like most Southerners, I have ancestors who owned slaves and others who did not. During my childhood, my relatives took great pride in those branches of the family tree that were the wealthy, slaveholding ones. Now, from the perspective of late middle age, I have come to entertain reservations about these slaveholding ancestors. I see them in many respects as precursors of the corporate interests in our society that are colonizing our nation with Third World aliens: quite willing to burden America and its white posterity with rival, sullen, and hostile racial aliens so that these interests can obtain cheap labor at the expense of white Americans.”

        • Albionic American

          I cannot believe that people like you who believe that slavery was in any shape or form actually beneficial to the white race.

          Jews promote everything they can think of to damage white people these days. If Negro slavery hurt our ancestors so badly, why do the Jews demonize it now?

          • Meme Lord

            Jews demonize it because of the impact it had on blacks. My criticism is based on the impact it had on whites. The logic is completely different. It was a harmful institution because it introduced a rival race to white society, with no feasible way to remove them from it. History, as well as nature has shown us that introducing a different species invasive to an environment can be disastrous.

            If there were no negroes in America to begin with, we would have a far healthier society.

          • free_peach

            The rivalry with the white race will always exist. Jews brought slavery to America and still benefit from it.

          • Meme Lord

            Aye, but if we can keep our enemies overseas, the threat will be largely mitigated.

          • free_peach

            You’re already a minority and your leaders pretend to bring more. What do you suggest to turn the tide?

    • Anon

      Some crazy women praise mass shooters they have this fixer complex of trying to understand and love a bad boy who is just an unwanted unloved misunderstood character. Saw some women on tumblr talking about how much they love elliot rodger I think it was. Anyway, regardless of how ugly or handsome the mass shooter is, they always have fangirls. And this is a thing before inceldoom or the recent mass shootings. Charles Manson had crazy fangirls and a lot of mass murders of old had crazy fangirls. That’s just how it has been and how it is.

      • TRVTH

        It’s not “some crazy women.” It’s normal female sexuality. It always has been. Go to Wikipedia, look up “hybristophilia.”

        Women are genetically hardwired to spread their legs for the barbarian warriors who killed their husbands and children. This is one of many reasons that Islam is right about women.

        • Anon

          A paraphilia? That sounds like the opposite of normal.

  • QuickshooterMk2

    Stop being soy and hit the gym ya wanker
    consume more protein and eat more onion, onion increases testosterone
    physical activities increase testosterone, sunshine increases testosterone

    Sugar Decreases testosterone, Soy Decreases testosterone, Beer Decreases testosterone (it’s the hops)
    https://www.lifetwink.com/beer-hops-estrogen-sedation-of-the-population-men-shouldnt-ever-drink-beer/

    and most importantly, never lust after women (esp roasties)
    never masturbate (reduces testosterone by a fuckton) and never let yourself be addicted to the digital jew (porn)

    A woman will always gravitate towards the strongest, manliest man around so don’t fall for the “sensitive guy” nonsense
    and if you look like crap, at least be handy with tools
    Ladies will always be attracted to men with skills
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/722a225c85ea1516bf03ab5dd859a0c6309d8118d0cbaa7ceacdeea4b0a09a02.jpg
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/866f743d09eac9283830957992c9f203482703cd8db5ebbc9d73c31f0c175775.jpg

    • CMK

      Good takes.

    • Paul Genovese

      Good lord you are retarded

      • QuickshooterMk2
        • Paul Genovese

          I am a very happy gay, and I cant control being a jew. UwU

          • Maxwell Macdonald

            >I can’t control being a jew
            Not true, being Jewish is a belief that you choose. (unless you support the idea that “Jewish” is an ethnicity)

          • Paul Genovese

            Its legally defined as one but k

        • Paul Genovese

          You’re acting like being a jew is a bad thing, sorry hitler,

          This boi likes men and is proud of his race

          • QuickshooterMk2

            you know what?
            good for you, jews need all the gay they can get

          • Paul Genovese

            Imagine being racist

          • QuickshooterMk2

            “Racism” doesn’t exist https://files.catbox.moe/c78osc.jpeg
            it’s made up by kikes to demonize Europeans
            and you know, i find solace at the fact that a sodomite jew like you won’t be breeding

            the less kikes in the world, the better

          • Paul Genovese

            Thinking less of someone for their race is racism. You sound like a racist dude

          • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

            You sound like a hymie parasite. Looks like all those pesticides will come in handy.

          • free_peach

            >not posting the correct version
            https://coub.com/view/es46a

          • partyrockerinthehou

          • QuickshooterMk2

            Before the Bolshevik revolution the word “racism” didn’t exist
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f199b4cc05ba3184c1e5bd6fdbedffb20bd71528e9e4ed3374ab659fca73ff2a.jpg

          • free_peach

            /thread

          • Said the faggot Jew bigot.
            “Nationalism for me but not for thee.”

          • Paul Genovese

            Ok boomer

          • Please stand against the wall for your photo. Wait for the bright flash.

      • free_peach

        t. furry.

    • Never masturbate? That would make me pop an erection all the time. Do you think they would like that?

      • QuickshooterMk2

        as a 10 Month No Fapper i can tell you the random erections go away after the third month

        by the 6th you’ll lose all craving for masturbation
        but there is a positive side affect
        considering you don’t masturbate your body finds ways to get rid of the “excess” semen in your balls by giving you erotic dreams every 2-3 weeks

        it’s truly wonderful, but you need an iron will and military discipline to fight the urge
        but first you must cleanse your mind of porn, many in the west are utterly addicted to it (weather jew porn or digital/cartoon hentai)

        i’ed recommend masturbating without any porn whatsoever
        it will be painful and dull, but after nutting you will realize what a hollow, fruitless, shameful experience masturbation is

        and then you’re going to have to nuke all your porn stash, you’re going clean after all
        and temptation should be exterminated if you want to success

        after 6 months you will notice your skin is a lot smoother, you’ll have a lot more energy
        and random roasties will start hitting on you (they sense the essence, don’t avoid women, but deny them your precious bodily fluids)

        i myself was hit by 6/10 roastie in a Cruise, i obviously turned that bitch down after i learned she’s pro homosexuals (most vegan chicks are like that, it’s another part of the regimen to hand pick the woman you want to be with

        problem is all the good women are either taken, live in the countryside
        or are part of the Christcuck faction
        as a man of good faith, i can only recommend women if you want to secure the existence of your people and a future for your bloodline

        otherwise women are a distraction and a waste of time, from redpilling whites on their targeted genocide

      • Anon

        I understand the coomer meme and the sin of lust, but supposedly nofap for long periods of time highly increases the chances of prostate cancer.

        • CMK

          That’s why you’re supposed to get married and have intercourse.

      • Crash

        After over twenty five years and four kids, I can categorically state that it is in the win column. Never be afraid to marry a young woman.

    • Anon

      Men with skills, like murder.

      • Murder isn’t a skill. Any man can kill. It’s built in, like sneezing.
        The trick is holding back the urge to kill every a-hole you meet each day.

        • Crash

          You win the internets.

        • Anon

          What about shooting.

    • Love and Justice

      If you increase your testosterone and don’t take estrogen blockers, your body will convert some of the extra testosterone to estrogen to partially reassert equilibrium, especially if you’re fat. Some weight lifters get little tits from this, don’t just blindly ramp up testosterone without an e-blocker.

      • QuickshooterMk2

        Sounds like bullshit to me
        have you got sauce to back that up?

        • Love and Justice

          Fat cells release aromatase, an enzyme that converts testosterone to estrogen:

          https://alphanation.com/nutrition/aromatase-and-testosterone-production/
          https://www.hiddendominion.com/body-fat-and-testosterone/
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase

          Body builders who don’t take percaution risk gynecomastia:

          https://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/core_june_5.htm

          • QuickshooterMk2

            Oh wow it is real…
            but does it affect people with a robust diet?
            (not just protein and fat, but plenty of veggies and fruits)

            or only those who overdose on protein?

          • Love and Justice

            As far as I’m aware, it’s a separate matter from a well designed diet. It’s just that if you ramp up testosterone, especially if you’re fat, you should seriously consider an aromatase blocker.

          • QuickshooterMk2

            so if you’re not fat, you have nothing to worry about?

            and what did our ancestors use as a hormone blocker? there is a gotta a natural alternative than taking chemicals…

          • Love and Justice

            Our male ancestors weren’t fat. I suspect it’s no coincidence that sperm counts plunged over the same period when public obesity took off. This is a new era for human biochemistry.

            I think humans also evolved with being fat as more of a female thing. Pregnancy takes women out of commission for long periods, and so starvation resistance was especially important for them, especially as they optimized around having male providers. Thus women evolved to be smaller, have less muscle proportionally, have lower metabolisms to reduce calorie needs, but also to have a higher percentage of body fat when healthy. Two prominent signs of female fertility come from fat stores; breasts and bulging ass. Being well fed results in very early fertility for modern females, is used to be a century ago that women wouldn’t start to get breasts until they were like 16. Fat has important feminizing effects on women, but unfortunately some of those effects apply to men who commonly get fat in the modern era.

            According to the Wikipedia article, aromatase has other sources besides fat, but I’m guessing modern unprecedented fatness is the major source. Getting gynecomastia and feeling more emotional aren’t fatal; you do not need this artificial chemical to survive.

  • Pete Zaitcev

    Not exactly sure what the joke is supposed to be about. Women always do this. Remember the Boston Maraphon bomber Tsarnayev? That was more recent than Bundy.

  • Relatable

  • Twilk9

    It’s kind of funny seeing these comments all come up with ways on how to make it so women have no choice but to date you.

    Like, what happened to all your free market sensibilities, guys? Women want a product, and that product is not you. Suddenly everyone here is all about removing women’s choice in the market.

    That’s sexual socialism, lads.

    • Albionic American

      The human species stayed in business just fine for thousands of years before market liberalism transformed areas of life that it should have left alone. Traditionalists just want to hit the reset button to restore society to its state before the dysfunctions of modernity started.

      • Twilk9

        And classical liberals want people to have the freedom to do or choose to do whatever they want, even if it means my gay immigrant neighbors get to keep M-4s to protect their land.

        Picking and choosing what you do and dont want market forces to dictate smells like hypocrisy to me, but at least your consistent with your reactionary-ism

        • Albionic American

          We restrict the market in all kinds of ways to preserve civilization.You can’t legally hire assassins, for example.

          • Twilk9

            So now we’re making an equivalency between murder and allowing women choice of who they want to be with?

        • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

          Your shitskin dykes would and should be denied M4s, because they’re likely illegal, have a criminal past, will never actually own land, and do everything in their power to destroy the civilization they have infested with their sheer presence.

          • Twilk9

            Wow, you learned all that from one sentence? About people that dont even exist and were made up to illustrate a point?

            You’re cool, man

          • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

            It’s a simple fact known by smart people – a.k.a. those that aren’t retards like yourself.

            Correct – and you can never hope to be as cool as me.

        • free_peach

          “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law”. We have a satanist here guys, but does she know?

          • Twilk9

            Is that what we call libertarians now? Lol you’re like the one stonetoss comic where they see swastikas instead of the gadsden flag. Only you see satan instead

            http://stonetoss.com/comic/snake-in-the-grass/

          • free_peach

            Are you a libertarian? Wow, is that the term you use now? He has many names.

          • Twilk9

            Oooh clever, I’m proud of you. And hilarious hahaha

            You are aware that the writer of the site himself is a libertarian, yeah?

          • free_peach

            Are you really trying to bring someone who owns a company, is legally liable for what goes on his platform, defends free speech, is against a media oligopoly into the same table with a backyard satanist the likes of yours? That is laughable indeed. You should be laughing and I’m not proud of you.

          • Twilk9

            Well, if your definition of “libertarian” is satanist, then YOU’RE the one bringing him to that table.

            Because guess what? Libertarians defend free speech and are against media oligopolies. That’s kind of part of our deal

    • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

      False equivalence, retard, and it doesn’t account for the fact that
      the market is far from free, with the amount of degeneracy being
      promoted; you fool no one, jew.

      • Twilk9

        Oh no the internet man called me names and hurt my internet feelings

        False equivalence? In this situation, women are consumers and sex is capital. Women are bringing their capital to the industries (men) that they prefer and are in demand.

        People like you complaining that it’s unfair that this top 1% of men or whatever is getting all the capital? And think that they should be made to spread it evenly to those who are less in demand? Any of that sound familiar?

        That’s textbook socialism, my guy.

        Just because you dont agree with their choices or think it’s unfair doesnt give you the right to control the market.

        • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

          Yes, and you remain weak all the same.

          Correct, false equivalence: Because sex is sacred and should not be treated like a commodity. Only a sickening, porn-peddling jew would ever treat it as such, but I suppose this is to be expected from desert merchants whose first sexual and indeed initial world experience is getting sucked off by Rabbi Ira. I take it he still doesn’t return your phone calls?

          The rightful complaints and indeed revolution come from the degradation of society as a whole, which is why there is such a large pushback against you filthy heebs. You fool no one.

          I am not your guy, faggot; save it for the gay bar before another ISIS member shoots it up.

          Your false equivalence, gross oversimplification, Bulverist appeals to identity, and other uses of fallacious “logic” fall upon deaf ears, and demonstrate yet again why John Doe was the hero in Se7en. Your sin is Pride.

          • Twilk9

            Lol you’re hilarious. Please keep it coming

          • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

            It’s funny because it’s true; kill yourself, you sickening Jew.

  • Albionic American

    Women are sheep, and they reflect the character of their shepherds.

    In a healthy patriarchal society, women would enjoy better lives than they do now because men tend to make better decisions for women than they make for themselves. And a lot of our advantage over women comes from our lower time preference, because white men, especially, understand causality and the value of delaying gratification better than other demographics.

    • Twilk9

      Or we could let people choose how to live their own lives, because not everyone is the same. Some women want to be doctors. Some want to be housewives. Good for both of them.

      Choosing for someone else how to live their life because you claim to know what’s best for them? Sounds an awful lot like communism

      • AWACS SkyEye

        t. hole

      • 45B20

        And some become engineers who design suspended walk ways that collapse and kill PPL

        • Twilk9

          Huh, the designer of the sweetwater bridge that failed and killed six people last year was a man. Guess we should stop men from being more than house husbands too?

          It’s almost like failure isn’t limited to women

          • 45B20

            wrong again, bucko

          • Twilk9

            Lol. Literally anyone can look it up and see the designer was a man.

            But why bother with research that might show you’re not right when you can just plug your ears and say “wrong again”

          • 45B20

            I mentioned an un-named project/waaman and you instantly jumped to the conclusion you reached, how could that be if no woman was involved?
            We all know the game your playing. Better luck next time Prog

          • Twilk9

            Hahaha it doesnt matter if it’s unnamed, because your conclusion is that because since a woman designed one failed bridge they should not be allowed to design bridges.

            So I brought a failed bridge that killed people designed by a man.

            By your logic, since a man designed a failed bridge, men should not be allowed to design bridges either. Is that true?

          • The Florida International University bridge project was so obviously wrong, that nobody involved with the project should be walking around free today. There was no way it could possibly have succeeded. The construction company warned the engineers and the inspector that it was unstable and would most likely collapse.

            And that engineering firm was celebrated as being 100% female. That’s why they got the contract. The inspector was also a woman, of course.

          • Twilk9

            Hate to break it to you, but almost everything you said is objectively false. The firm, Figg Engineering, is not all women and has never claimed to be (in fact, the five heads of the firm are all men).

            And as a matter of fact, the lead engineer was Denney Pate, who was and continues to be a man.

            Dont know about the inspector. But thanks for showing another great example of why men shouldnt design bridges /s

          • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

            You were just given researched, cited evidence, retard, but of course you’re too brain-dead to comprehend it.

          • Twilk9

            Researched and cited? He hadnt even NAMED the bridge he was talking about hahaha

            Speaking of brain dead, geez

          • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

            It should be obvious – yes, speaking of brain-dead, you still fit the bill immeasurably.

          • You are Not a Victim
          • Twilk9

            Wow, you just mentioned the fact that women are less likely to produce more money. Due to factors like maternity, etc. Congratulations. Everyone knows that, very astute of you.

            And wow! You also showed that people in predominantly math, memorization and calculation oriented fields are better at the math-memorization-and-calculation oriented IQ test. I’ll alert the Nobel commitee

          • Albionic American

            Plenty of childless career women wind up poorer than men of the same age as well.

          • Twilk9

            And like I said, the water gap has been known and explained time and time again. Issues like maternity etc.

            That still doesnt give you the right to choose for them to only be housewives.

          • Allison Kaas

            IQ applies equally to everyone in all fields, keep seething.

          • Twilk9

            Really? Then why did Hauser et al, in his research paper that surveys ONLY MEN in professional fields, find that men in computer science, engineering, and math fields also had IQs about 10-15 points higher than men in social work, psychology, etc? And that’s without women possibly skewing the data.

            On top of that, it’s just common sense. Have you ever taken an IQ test? It’s about 80% pattern recognition, numbers, and calculation.

            Keep seething, pal

          • Allison Kaas

            Nope IQ is right stay mad πŸ™‚

          • morgondag

            This is a fantastic argument from someone who thinks women should be housewives. Yes, if women stay at home instead of working and paying taxes (as they to a certain degree already do, but you think EVERY woman should do), of course they are on paper going to have a “negative net fiscal impact”! But that is exactly how you WANT to organize society!

      • Women want to be wives and mothers.
        Anything else gets in the way of that.

        • Twilk9

          Wow it’s so impressive that you’ve spoken to every single woman on earth and found out that every single one wants to be a wife and a mother. So impressive

          • You are Not a Victim
          • Twilk9

            Cool! You know, there’ve been studies that show that 10% or more of people are happier on a government provided universal basic income, too. Are you arguing for that, since you’re obviously so concerned for people’s happiness?

            I’m certainly not. Because theres still a percentage that ARE happy being working women, just like theres a percentage that ARE happy without government cheese.

            Just because SOME women are happier as wives does not give you the right to say that therefore, ALL women must be housewives. That’s ridiculous.

          • You are Not a Victim

            I can’t actually tell if you’re being serious or not. The entire crux of your ‘argument’ is an emotional and moralistic point that we need to preserve feminism and a woman’s quote “right to choose” because it’s ‘the right thing to do’, not because it has any real-world benefit or merit. And yet you’re whining about logical fallacies and “real arguments”… really? It’s kind of hard to believe you can’t see this and you aren’t just a committed troll, especially when you go around trying to convince people you’re a man with hilariously feminine prose.

            Then you keep bringing up communism and socialism, the policies of which have only passed today thanks to womens’ suffrage (along with an inflated welfare state and a mass influx of “refugees” from Islamic countries). Nobody is concerned for how “happy” anyone is except you. You’ve already made it readily apparent that the long-term health of society is less important than making sure women are not oppressed or whatever the hell you call it. You keep up your archetypal battle cry of “not ALL [insert protected class here]” because you’re either too stupid to understand basic math or just feigning ignorance to make a point.

            The overwhelming majority of women will vote for far-left policies and are not very useful as workers. You’re going to have to live with it.

          • Twilk9

            No, the entire crux of my argument is that people should not be allowed to choose how others live.

            That means bakers should not be forced to serve those they dont agree with. That means the government should not be allowed to pick who gets to buy weapons. And it means people should not be allowed to decide what a woman wants to do with her life, whether they’re feminists or people like you.

            I’m not a feminist, per se. I believe that a woman should be allowed to choose to be a stay at home mom. But that should be HER choice, not yours.

            You make this argument that a plurality of women are happier being housewives, and then make the logical leap that therefore all women must be housewives.

            But when I try to apply that same logic to studies that show a majority of people are happier on a government supplied basic income, it suddenly becomes ridiculous? Explain that one to me, please.

            And no, the long term health of society (or whatever YOU THINK might be key to that) is not as important as upholding this country’s basic tenets that every person has a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I’m not willing to squander this nation’s founding principles just because I think I should choose what women should do.

            And I only bring up communism constantly because I think it’s hilarious watching all you fierce anti-communist fight to the end trying to defend the idea that some people should just choose what others do with br their lives. And yet you dont see the hypocrisy in that.

            And finally, yes I’m a man. Luckily for me, my Junk’s presence doesnt depend on the belief of internet strangers

          • TRVTH

            Cool. How about children? How about the mental defectives, the retarded and the insane? Do they get to walk around without supervision and do whatever they want? Do criminals get to walk free and do what they want because “people don’t get to choose how others live?”

            Do you concede that there is behavior that is socially corrosive and socially destructive, which a society can either discourage or crumble into Clown World? Or are there no rules at all? HONK HONK

          • Twilk9

            Are you making equivalencies between normal, functioning adults and criminals/the insane?

          • TRVTH

            >women
            >normal, functioning adults

            Choose one and only one, or enjoy your ride to Clown World.

          • Men can’t bear and raise children.
            Or do you deny this basic fact of biology?

          • Twilk9

            What does that have to do with anything I’ve said? I know that. Literally everyone knows that.

            Not once have I ever said women should not be wives and mothers. Not once have I said women shouldnt have children.

            All I’m saying is it should be up to the woman to decide to be a mother or wife, not the men who think they know better.

            And that it’s hilarious watching anti-communists fight tooth and nail arguing that some people should just be in charge of other people’s decisions and lives.

            How about you come join me on the side of true libertarianism, hmm?

          • The future is children. No children, no future. Civilization depends upon children. Therefore, any woman who chooses to remain childless is fighting against her own civilization.

            They are also fighting their own biology. Childless women generally become increasingly crazy, because they have failed to perform their prime function. Not to mention the simple fact that childless women are much more prone to cancer.

            Nice attempt to squirrel! Now shut up or drop dead, traitor.

          • Twilk9

            Alright, to start with, you’re advocating that people set aside their personal freedom to serve the greater good of their society, yes? Are you taking notes from Stalin, then? Or maybe Mao? That was one of their favorite talking points.

            Secondly, if you’re so intent on bettering our society for tomorrow, maybe it should start with you. What are YOU doing? Do you practice what you preach, or are you the same as the pro-Sanders kids who talk up socialism but dont give a cent to charity or help the homeless? Are you donating your money to charities that help orphans? Are you personally growing crops so that america has enough food and doesnt have to import any? Or are you just a hypocrite who wants OTHER people to do what you think is best, but not you?

            By the way, the rates of cancer in childless women increase by less than a percent. In contrast, eating red meat increases cancer risk by about 30 percent. Maybe we should ban red meat, too?

            And hahaha, better a squirrel (whatever that means) than someone who posts blatantly false information. Remember when you did that, about the bridge?

          • Logshaman

            Wouldn’t that also apply to childless men too? They also had a prime function to breed and create kids, what about them?

          • TRVTH

            Lolbertarianism is just another shortcut to Clown World, and no one claiming to be a lolbertarian can be taken seriously.

          • Twilk9

            Lol and anyone who uses the word “lolbertarian” are sure to be taken VERY seriously

          • TRVTH

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/04643dc9525489a2cc9602e919feeea6d93def089ea8222da41d08e42a6bd4a7.png

            Blood and soil. When lolbertarians figure out that borders, language, and culture are real and have real consequences in the real world, let us know.

      • Albionic American

        Nature decides what works for people, not arbitrary ideologies like feminism and anti-racism. I know a woman with a master’s degree in neuroscience who finally got married and had a daughter in her 30’s. I can see from her behavior, or from her “revealed preference” as economists call it, that she has realized that motherhood works better with her natural strengths as a woman that trying to pursue an indifferent career as a scientist.

        • Twilk9

          Cool! You’ve spoken to ONE woman. I’m proud of you. Very good. 3.5 billion to go.

          That’s what we call anecdotal evidence, friend. And I agree; arbitrary ideologies shouldnt decide people’s futures either.

          That is for each individual person to decide. Not you. Not me. Your friend thinks motherhood is great for her? Great for her! There may be 3.5 billion other women on the planet who may or may not disagree. Each with their own experience and views on the matter

          • Being a wife an mother has been the primary duty for 99.44% of all women, for all of history.
            Anything else is a rare exception.

            Women are designed to want to be taken care of, and to care for their children. Childless women working steady jobs outside the home is why so many of them are miserable today.

          • Twilk9

            Being a trap setter and beast hunter has been a man’s job for 99.4% of history too, but saying that’s why we should go back to trap setting and besr hunting is a ridiculous argument.

            Women are biologically designed to bear children. Correct. Men are biologically designed to father them. Also correct.

            It should be up to anyone except the woman in question whether to have children. It should not be up to anyone except the man in question whether to father them.

          • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

            One more woman than you’ll ever speak with, k ike.

          • Twilk9

            Dont tell my wife that, hahaha

          • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

            Don’t need to; she’s too busy getting plowed by Tyrone anyway.

          • Albionic American

            I know plenty of other women who turned into sterile feminist cat ladies. I don’t see what they have to live for as they age and die as evolutionary dead ends.One of them works for a cryonics organization, and she has cryopreserved her pet dead cat because she considers it her “child” and her “family.” I just find this woman’s situation really sad.

          • Twilk9

            “Plenty of other women” is still not even a fraction of a percent of all women.

            And you are viewing their lives through the prism of your beliefs; just because they are an unmarried cat woman does not necessarily mean they are unhappy; it just means you THINK they are unhappy compared to how you think they should be living.

      • Albionic American

        Choosing for someone else how to live their life because you claim to know what’s best for them?

        Some people just demonstrate objectively better judgment than other people. A lot of good judgment involves time preference, and social scientists can measure that characteristic empirically:

        Quantifying Future Time Orientation

        • Twilk9

          So by that logic, we should just let those people decide everything for everyone.

          If the goal is to prevent as few bad decisions as possible, then have these people decide our careers, how we spend our money, where we live, etc.

          And suddenly were communists. See where I’m going with this? You cant make the case that “some people are better at making decisions” and espouse that they make decisions for people, but then arbitrarily draw the line at women.

          • Your womanly feelz do not trump our masculine intellect. Nor does it make you stronger than us men.

            Now go make me a sammich!

          • Twilk9

            I’m a man, and happily so. Sorry to break the news. Not once have I said women are stronger than men.

            Now, do you still want that sammich, or are you just gonna sit there and call names without making a real argument

          • Albionic American

            Our ancestors recognized long ago that something called “wisdom” existed, that is makes a practical difference in living a good life, and that some people have a lot more of it than other people.

          • Twilk9

            And our ancestors have also learned time and time again that giving a few people free reign to choose how everyone else lives and chooses to live has resulted in disaster sooner or later. Whether it’s the USSR or the Third Reich

          • Allison Kaas

            Nope, fascism is good.

          • Twilk9

            Wow what a beautiful evidence-based rebuttal. Really puts me in my place

          • Allison Kaas

            stay seething incel lmaoooo

      • free_peach

        Or you could be silent woman, go back to the kitchen and only come back in the case you made me a sandwich.

        • Twilk9

          Lol once again, I am a man and proudly so. Cant say my sandwich will be any good

          Hilarious that someone with lame name like yours is going around telling people to be silent, though

          • free_peach

            You can’t see through irony. I don’t believe you.

          • Twilk9

            Oh gosh

            Better tell my junk the internet stranger doesnt believe it exists

            Thatll be a hard conversation

          • free_peach

            You failed to see irony and didn’t get my joke. You’re officially a woman, at least mentally.

          • Twilk9

            Lol sorry I didnt understand your entire worldview and political alignment (and thus what you mock) from a single comment. I’ll try harder next time hahaha

          • free_peach

            Please don’t, I’ve suffered enough.

          • Zimriel

            just block the soy like i did

      • Allison Kaas

        We do know what’s best for them, retard.

        • Twilk9

          Funny, that’s just what Stalin said. And Castro. And Mao.

          “Four legs good, two legs better”

          • Allison Kaas

            They were all correct dumbass

          • Twilk9

            Hahaha is this an admission that you’re a communist? And believe in the communist messaging

      • Love and Justice

        Agree with qualification. It’s true that women come with a range of abilities and interests, and some would and do excel in areas that are not traditionally female dominated. The modern economy has created a situation where men and women don’t need each other anymore, we survive apart, and while depressed, nobody intellectually wants a dictator trying to make them happy by limiting their options.

        However, while the modern economy has emancipated men and women from their mutual dependence for survival, it has not altered our evolutionary baggage. Countless little behavioral tendencies favored by evolution accumulated, and what survived the trial of nature best was submissive women and dominant men. The idea of being automatically subordinate offends our modern sense of fairness, but in the current era, it is deeply ingrained in our hardware and software. This inequality can only be overcome by either having enough time to evolve around modern industrial society or by genetic engineering. Attempting to alter gender inequality by social engineering has only resulted in a population in denial.

        Men and women have overlap in abilities, more so in some areas than others, but they have their differences in group averages. Not only physical, but mental. It’s not uncommon for modern women to say they want a sweet caring guy and then go for the dangerous and alluring man when given the choice between the two. I don’t think it operates on an intellectual level, it’s just that the nice guy never made anybody’s panties wet. It was not an evolutionarily favored embedded preference. More women than not would probably find a sense of completeness in being a housewife, but they’re raised to revile that outcome and are no longer forced by circumstance to find a man.

        I’m not advocating communism or national socialism that interprets traditional gender roles as healthiest for the nation, I’m just calling for more realism and less idealism. Given the truth straight, I think people will tend to self-organize towards their interests.

        • Twilk9

          Finally, some sense. I agree with a lot of what you said; despite what many here would apparently like to believe, I agree with your conclusions that many women are raised to revile the idea of being a housewife, and I believe that this is a mistake. I also believe that forcing women into traditional roles is also a mistake. Your central premise of “people will tend to organize toward their interests”? Couldnt agree more. And what I want is FOR people to organize into their own self interests, without government or social forces telling them one or the other is a mistake.

          I agree again with your ideas that women and men have intrinsic differences in thought, and that this may predispose them to certain fields. I do not believe these differences to be “amount of intelligence” or cognition, but rather, differences in thought approach and methodology. If that makes sense. The fact that over time women have gravitated toward medical fields and men to engineering is pretty convincing evidence.

          Where i find myself disagreeing with you is your thought that social engineering as a means to overcome intrinsic difference is a fool’s errand. But this is where my argument is weakest, and where my biases will become clear. For example, I could point to the idea of nationhood as a social construct that overcame humanity’s genetic predisposition to only be able to form units capable of cooperation if they number 150 or less.

          Of course you could flip that on its head and say that therefore we must abolish the state and empower local community, which is something I am very much for hahaha. But despite that i still believe that man is more than his genetic predispositions

          • Love and Justice

            Thanks for your long reply. Disqus comments tend to get pretty echo-chamber. While I enjoy lots of dissident voices here expressing commonly censored opinions, they often disappoint me at holding up an argument. Usually those attacking the Disqus consensus are no better, so it is refreshing to see someone going against the grain in a thoughtful manner.

            I agree that women shouldn’t be forced into domestic roles. There’s a possible bit of gray zone here; what if by evolution women tend to respond positively to some forms of oppression? What if something deep down in their brains is optimized around that condition? (Why are domination fetishes so common?) Nevertheless, even if so, I’d rather live in a society where people are free to choose their path in life. Freedom is not only good for personal agency, but for economic and societal outcomes if the people are given correct and relevant information.

            In principle, social engineering attempts to push things out of their equilibrium state. If girls receive relevant information about common life outcomes, they will tend to choose paths that best suit their individual particulars. If they (and their parents) are given a skewed perspective via social engineering, they will tend towards different choices on false or incomplete premises. Optimizing your outcome on the basis of false or incomplete information is probably not going to work as well for you, but you’ll be more likely to do things a third party would like.

            Does that third party have your best interests at heart? What if they think they do, but in reality have mistaken their interest for the common interest? What if they aren’t as clever as they fancy themselves? One example of a social engineering failure was the self-esteem movement. Researchers in the 70’s noticed that kids with higher self-esteem got better life outcomes, and concluded that high self-esteem protects you from bad outcomes (teen pregnancy, drug use, suicide, etc). They apparently failed to recognize that it’s getting bad life outcomes that lowers your self-esteem. A decade later the idea caught on and self-esteem programming made it into schools all over America. We got participation trophies and narcissistic brats instead of the desired improvements.

            When you say that you like social engineering when it broadens personal choice, I naturally imagine various equal rights movements; for women, for blacks, for people with atypical sexuality. Nominally these people were all legally equal to begin with, but in practice social attitudes would need to change to help them actualize themselves in various ways. If you want people to live in freedom and have good opportunities, these all seem like good policies to socially engineer towards, right? Well, social engineering is a powerful tool and it’s not always easy to anticipate the fallout.

            Part of the equal rights social engineering involved traumatizing school children. Like the medieval tales to children about bad kids getting eaten by monsters, they were told there’s these evil people called the “racists”. They’re consumed by “hate”, they were brainwashed as children themselves, they firebomb innocent people’s homes, they’re basically unconvicted murdering terrorists, and if you say the “N-word” you’re one of them! It gets impressed on them that if people ever think you’re racist, you’re going to get fired, shunned by your friends and harassed by doxing strangers. People find themselves in adulthood simultaneously scared of racists as these violent irrational hate monsters, and scared of being accused of racism themselves if they repeat an off-color joke or say anything that contradicts a point of the conditioning: Race is purely cosmetic, race is just a social construct, there’s no biological basis for race, etc. Well, what if these conditioned beliefs are wrong, and now we’re making bad choices based on them?

            You would expect it to be academic suicide to publish a research paper that contradicted the orthodoxy. You would expect some institutions to begrudgingly accept the rights of free inquiry, but others to expel students and staff for merely proposing to put a tenet of faith to the test. In such an environment, contradictory evidence may be widely dismissed out of hand as “pseudo science”, and the heretics not allowed to spread their hate facts on campus.

            Other equal rights conditioning bandwagon on the enemy figure “hate”. The demon “hate” that could possess anyone of us, also dislikes women for no reason, and doesn’t even want cross-dressing 11 year-old boys to get dollars put in their thongs at gay strip clubs. Thus, when James Demor tries to argue a non-discriminatory reason for the wage gap to a small group of coworkers, he’s fired despite giving a well-supported and logical case, and it makes national news for over a week.

            So, social engineering gave us beliefs that are well protected from criticism by the armor of institutions and social customs.Those beliefs could be incorrect, but what’s the problem if it helps women become CEOs, black people become doctors, and transbians adopt children?

            Being in denial of differences between men and women results in a wage gap that will never go away, and yet will be fought with increasing intensity until we start doing insane self-destructive things to fix it.

            Being in denial of racial differences means that while racial achievement gaps are not going away, we will keep taking stronger and stronger measures to close them. There will always be just enough “systemic racism” to explain the gaps. Teachers will have to look the otherway when races more likely to misbehave do so. Black medical students already get accepted with dramatically worse grades, but there’s perennial calls to lower the bar further until they’re a representative portion of our surgeons. People are going to die over the unproven premise that there’s no such thing as race, and I stand to retire in a country that comes to resemble southern California.

            Being in denial about the healthiness of being LGBTQ+ and promoting it to our children as a heroic victim group is going to result in some kids who otherwise wouldn’t have embraced that lifestyle going for it. If being trans is seen as a way to get out of white guilt or get social justice accolades, you’ll see edge-cases going for it and getting their hormones, finances, bodies, and mental state mangled. A social taboo against homosexuality goes a long way towards discouraging people from even trying it, and we’re ripping that taboo away even though 70% of new HIV cases occur in this single-digit percentage of the population.

            What if we didn’t try this social engineering? What if instead of childhood traumatization, we just continued to argue to developed adults that people deserve to be judged by their individual abilities instead of their group averages? What if we just decided to let organically occurring LGBTQ+ people be themselves in private, as a group we lightly pity instead of idolizing? I suspect we could have achieved similar levels of personal liberty, and come there from a position of rational consideration. It’s relatively easy to argue for procedural fairness to mature adults, no multi-generational manipulation that sets up unachievable expectations required.

          • Twilk9

            I too appreciate your candidness and your ability to hold well thought out, reasonable discussion.

            I think in this post you’ve really struck to the heart of the matter, which is, how are we able to present all choices and relevant facts to upcoming generations in a way that is free from the bias or prejudice of the people or institutions presenting them? As you say, if certain left wing groups present it, they will vilify certain lifestyles choices and ways of life. And I think the problem is that any group of humans will.

            To be honest, this is a question that I struggle with. A lot. And I think it’s a primary motivator for my desire to abolish the state and realize the local units, because I sure as hel l dont trust the state to do it.

            Unfortunately, I dont have the answer. I think that its impossible, or close to impossible, to present facts and choices (or conduct scaled social engineering) in a way that keeps the bias of the presenter out of the system.

            So I suppose my next best option is to be here, trying to fight the blatant attempts to limit choice that I see. And I suppose that I fight especially hard here because I see this site as having libertarian ideals, so it frustrates me seeing anti-libertarian ideas espoused here.

            If you have any ideas I’d be happy to hear them hahaha

          • Love and Justice

            One ingredient that you’ve already mentioned is allowing people to disregard social engineering. If people are allowed to buck the trend in their beliefs without undue legal or social harassment, they will have greater freedom. That could possibly be achieved by phasing out our current social engineering, or having a social engineering counter-thrust where it is strongly emphasized that people are allowed to have beliefs you hate and go unmolested.

            So, how do you present good information to the kids in a non-partial way? Assume your information is bound to be skewed in some way that’s not apparent to you. I say just don’t be heavy handed about it, gently put information before them. They are bound to seek supplemental evidence themselves, and whatever you show them will at least be a starting point on their journey of figuring out what’s real. Present both sides of an issue, emphasize that they should make up their own minds on these matters. Even if it’s an absurd subject like “flat earth”, just let them know that people argue this, why people argue this (getting it from them instead of being an amateur mind reader), and why most people think they’re wrong. Even if it’s a contentious topic that’s illegal to contradict in some countries like “what happened during the holocaust”, you just give them both sides, give them the rebuttal from each side, and give them some facts that you found compelling on the matter, but remind them to think for themselves.

            Going down to a community of 150 or so may not support the libertarian dream in practice. I’m lead to believe that in small agrarian towns where everyone knows everyone else, “honor” culture tends to develop, and then everyone in the town is strongly pressured to conform. It could be different if it were explicitly a libertarian town, but the same social forces are bound to act on the situation. It could be different if tried in modern society; what if everyone had online tech jobs, the town got Amazon and UPS shipments, and nobody actually depended on their neighbors for anything?

            Sometimes there’s something to be said for limiting choice. When Ren and Stimpy had to get around censors, it forced the creators to be way more innovative than a later release without those restrictions. Some pop-psychology papers suggest that we’re happiest with our choices when we pick from a smaller list of options than a larger one. Nevertheless, as a default position, I want maximum options too. Your best 1/1000 choice is bound to be better than the best of 10 of those choices pulled at random.

          • Twilk9

            Hahaha what you said about small agrarian towns, conformity, and “honor” is probably all that keeps me from going out and being an anarchist. The state makes me nervous, but bellicose tribalism makes me more nervous. Last thing I want is some medieval feudal lord situation where one powerful local community starts conquering all the others, or becoming otherwise transformed by power.

            Although I do believe there is something to be said for communities of like-minded and culturally sympathetic people to self form; just not to be FORCED to form and conform, as you’re (probably correctly) implying might be the case.

            Once again I agree with your conclusions that the best way to provide choice is to present all facts objectively without lifting one set above any other. I just find myself doubting whether humans will ever be able to do that effectively. I cant imagine theres a single person on earth who is without bias or who can lead, teach, or guide without bias. I know I certainly wouldn’t be able to.

            And again, I do believe you’re right about the current state of social engineering to be tilted one way or the other. For example, as I’ve said i agree that in our current social climate that perhaps women are being told that traditional roles are shackles. Honestly, that more than anything is what makes me think maybe I SHOULD just keep my mouth shut, because i believe there do need to be voices promoting traditional roles as well. But I’ve never been great at keeping my mouth shut.

            I think your idea that humans operate better with limits and not infinite choice is an interesting one, and I wouldn’t be suprised if there was evidence supporting that empirically. I just dont believe I could support that, on principle. I know that’s probably somewhat hypocritical of me, but that’s just my own bias showing again.

          • Love and Justice

            I heard that decades ago Hippies tried to make off-grid communes based on communist principles (hypothetical post-goverment final stage communism). None of these lasted more than 3 years. One thing that broke down was their egalitarian vision, some members ended up more powerful, some were naturally more assertive. I know you’re not into communism, but just food for thought regarding small alternative communities.

            The state along with media and banks certainly makes me nervous too, and spurs me to occasionally consider what I’d need to begin sustenance farming. The system has a nice shiny exterior of law, merit and egalitarianism, but who really has influence? Because it’s secretive by nature, you’re only going to see bits and pieces accidentally revealed, or see revealing patterns that only emerge over the course of decades. I think I’m seeing loxism at play as a reoccurring theme, but now I’m looking for it, and viewing a complicated and opaque thing full of parts with a lens risks false positives.

            Bellicose tribalism is another thing. Doesn’t seem like an immediate threat, but ethnic cleansings are a thing that happens when there’s a group with strong identity and more power than another group in close proximity.

            If the anarchist dream came true, then whatever allowed for the overthrow of the government might allow for the overthrow of would-be warlords. What is a gang but a tiny government? People who would risk their lives to get rid of a state that has evidence-based courts, procedural rules and spends most of it’s budget on programs for the direct benefit of the population would probably also risk their lives to get rid of an emerging feudal lord.

            While I’d like to see more push-back on the current social climate, we are but two disqus posters. History probably doesn’t care if you keep your mouth shut or not, so you might as well do what comes naturally to you πŸ˜‰

            Humans working better within limits certainly isn’t an original idea on my part. I think I’ve noticed that effect personally when making art in the context of restrictions. For that matter, creativity within limits is the entire premise of Haiku poetry. It’s hard to imagine a choice I’d like to have restricted for my benefit though. They can take unhealthy food off the market, but they can’t stop me from drinking gasoline.

          • Twilk9

            And that’s it exactly. No matter how small the community you will always have power and people in power, and thus people who abuse that power. It’s really a question without an answer, as far I can see.

            The example of the haiku is a really nice analogy. We may be but two disqus posters, but it sure is a nice change of pace to see some intelligent thought on here, that’s for sure. I appreciate it

  • Albionic American

    Ironically society will become more patriarchal and traditional in a few more generations any way just through differential fertility. The women who inherited the genetic predisposition to resist feminist indoctrination will more likely marry and produce largish families, while their sterile feminist sisters, like the dumb broads who fall in love with incarcerated murderers and terrorists whom they will never get into their beds, will die as evolutionary dead ends. In other words, the genes for traditional female behavior will come to dominate the population over the long run, after the unworkable, Enlightenment-derived social experiment of feminism collapses, like many of the other projects that came out of the Enlightenment which conflict with man’s nature.

    Paraphrasing Thomas Jefferson, time belongs in usufruct to the people who show up for it; and that means the latter 21st Century and beyond will belong to the descendants of traditional, feminine women who fulfill their role in the natural order. In the coming struggle between the Battle Angels versus the Bonnet Women, the Bonnet Women wield the secret weapon of the cradle.

    • Twilk9

      Right, because “resisting a specific social movement” is definitely something that acted as a selection pressure and became encoded into our genes.

      Dream on, brother

      • Albionic American

        Something like this has happened in Turkey, from what I’ve gathered. Turkey’s government after the First World War deliberately tried to secularize the country, but the traditional Muslim Turkish women ignored this central planning and social engineering, fought the war of the cradle in their Hayekian fashion, and in the long run they have re-religionized the country.

        • Twilk9

          Sure that could be true. But first off, Turkey and the US are miles apart on this, culturally; the secularization wasnt even that hard fought, sincere the same time they also created govt departments devoted to mosque upkeep and religious duties and continued teaching religion in public school.

          Second off, that is a huge leap to assume that that is due to genetics. There is no evidence for that.

  • Divosa Uplanovytch

    What is the punchline?
    Edit or delete this

  • partyrockerinthehou
  • Major Matt Mason

    I’m guessing the lack of zits is a factor.

  • Albionic American

    How do NPC;s think “misogyny” works, any way? Does some normal adolescent boy, when he tries to imagine his life as an adult man, want to become a misogynist when he grows up because he thinks it sounds really cool?

    Or does this boy instead develop into a mature man with a negative opinion of women based on experience, and he becomes a misogynist despite what he expected about his life?

    • True90sKidDetractorsAreFags

      They think any form of men enjoying themselves is misogyny, and ultimately seek their subjugation.

      This is why we must fight back. This is why the NPCs must be destroyed.

    • morgondag

      That argument could be used to prove that misogyny can’t exist anywhere, anytime. So even in the 19:th century, or today in Saudi Arabia, there is no sexism. Or if there is it’s because women there behaved bad.

      • Painting Guardian

        reminder that sexism and misogyny were words made up by communists to shame natural male behaviour in an attempt to damage the perception of masculinity. torture and slavery committed by sandnaggers are their own kettle of fish entirely, and framing those under blanket words like ‘misogyny’ and ‘sexism’ as if they’re somehow exactly the same as historical treatment of women in the western world smarts of intellectual dishonesty on your part.

        remember, everyone in the islamic faith worships moloch (Allah is the arabic words for Moloch), and the attitudes that they have towards women and q’afir are a reflection of that. you won’t fix anything that you want to fix if all you do is lie to people, tell half-truths, or omit key details based on your own lack of understanding of the core issues at hand.

        You can start by reading up on who Moloch is, what he represents, and what sacrifices made in his name often look like. It should also explain to you why the vast majority of fundamentalist Muslims (those practising strict adherence to the islamic faith) utterly despise Chrsistians.

  • Albionic American

    Our spiritual traditions teach us that we, and especially women, live for purposes beyond our selfish hedonism and our modern degenerate notions of personal fulfillment. You don’t have to believe in a god to see that these traditions recognize the tragic truth of the human condition that feminists can’t make go away with their Opposite World ideology.

  • OffAndSphere

    Explain the comic, please.

    • Griffin

      bruh

    • Zimriel

      I think the comic’s style hurts the point (I think) the author is making. Which is that Ted Bundy was a 10/10 hottie, besides being fairly successful.
      Ted Bundy’s avatar here looks like all the other ST avatars, and we can’t tell that he’s upper/middle income.

  • David

    One hell of a feminist salt mine in here.

  • IvanRemovekebaboff

    Ted Bundy was le CHAD

  • IvanRemovekebaboff

    Ted Bundy took RAPEPILL

Primary Sidebar