Skip to content
  • Indra Kaw

    Haha yes.

  • The first Thanksgiving happened after the third summer of Plymouth colony. For the first two years, the Pilgrims abided by the Mayflower Compact, which called for strict socialism. As a result, they didn’t grow nearly enough food, and starvation killed half the population each winter.

    The third spring, they allocated a plot of land to each family to work for their own benefit. That fall, despite a minor drought, they enjoyed a bountiful harvest. There was more than enough food for everyone. So they held a celebration of thanks giving to God for the harvest, and for teaching them the evils of socialism.

    • Okk

      What is your source ? From what I can read online, it seems that only the first winter was deadly, after which they had that first Thanksgiving with all the food you’re talking about. Or am I missing something ?

      • Good question. You’re missing the actual history. (((Google))) won’t show those results unless you go deep. It helps to have access to paper sources from more than 30 years ago. Gee, I wonder why libraries have been purging the old books?

        The first winter was quite deadly, mostly because they departed a lot later in the year than intended (massive screw ups plus politics) and they’d never experienced cold quite like that. England is much warmer than New England.

        • Okk

          Thanks for your answer. Makes sense for that first winter in America, and that’s actually data that can be found online, so I guess everyone kind of agrees on that part.

          What about the two years you’re talking about, though ? Are you saying that the first Thanksgiving took place in 1623, and not in 1621 as stated by most sources ? What paper sources are you talking about ?

          I’m just trying to understand where you’re coming from exactly, as, like you said, Internet doesn’t exactly provide me with the elements you’re stating in your first comment. They look interesting, but I can’t just take a lone Internet comment as fact; I’m sure you can understand that.

        • TheLulzWarrior

          Here is a better consideration on “socialism”.
          I now found that in the social democratic daily papers I could study the inner character of this politico-philosophic system much better than in all their theoretical literature.
          For there was a striking discrepancy between the two.
          In the literary effusions which dealt with the theory of Social Democracy there was a display of high-sounding phraseology about liberty and human dignity and beauty, all promulgated with an air of profound wisdom and serene prophetic assurance; a meticulously-woven glitter of words to dazzle and mislead the reader.
          On the other hand, the daily Press inculcated this new doctrine of human redemption in the most brutal fashion. No means were too base, provided they could be exploited in the campaign of slander.”

          “The theoretical literature was intended for the simpletons of the soi-disant intellectuals belonging to the middle and, naturally, the upper classes. The newspaper propaganda was intended for the masses.”

          The string pullers does not follow whatever ideological angles they currently push to advance their agenda, these are just baits for the ignorant and naive.
          Those angles are akin to the colors of a hook-nosed chameleon, when needed, they can shift from green to pink to red to black and yellow. Whatever is convenient.

      • TheLulzWarrior

        Rush Limbaugh stated something similar years back, forgot if he was the first one with that interpretation or not.
        The comment itself is an interesting study of the boomer mindset. That is, unable to understand what sort of situation the pilgrims were in and what means where available in the late 1610s.

    • TheLulzWarrior

      “It wuz sosaeesm!”
      > Boomers are unable to realize that establishing a new settlement in the wilderness would take years.

      • Shadowban This Cowards

        Congrats on the kikepedia link. We didn’t really need the kosher version of history, though. Do you have any actual evidence, or would you like to just run away in fear now?

    • Hmmm

      Where in the Mayflower Compact does it call for “strict socialism”?

  • Bullshit_Latin_Phrase2931

    Don’t ask questions; just consume product and get excited for more product.

  • Alistair Grove

    I prefer Nigger Wednesdays personally.

    • Major Matt Mason

      I was talking to my dad while we were up on the boat this weekend; we’d had
      a few Bloody Marys and so were pretty loosened up, and were discussing the
      fact that it was Easter Sunday. (I knew there was *some* reason why it was
      so quiet on channel 16 of the marine radio. But then, I’m a devout
      motherfucker, as you guys know. I’m a meek sonofabitch, and I’m gonna
      inherit the fuckin’ Earth!) He mentioned that one time, somebody who
      worked for him came to work with a smudge of ash on his forehead. My dad
      innocently told the guy that he had some kind of crud on his forehead, and
      that he might want to go to the men’s room and wash it off. The guy,
      rather shocked, replied that he had *ashes* on his forehead because it was
      Ash Wednesday.

      My dad considered this for a moment, then expressed his hope that there was
      no such thing as *Dog Shit* Wednesday.

      —- Geoff Miller ([email protected]) in alt.tasteless

  • Albionic American

    This sort of thing happens when you flood the country with diversity trash and destroy the high-trust society of the nation’s legacy white population. In fact I suspect the increasing alienation of the shopping experience has contributed to the growth of both online shopping and home delivery and store pickups from local supermarkets. White people will pay a premium just to not have to stand in line with diversitarians.

    • Holyphonic

      In fact I suspect the increasing alienation of the shopping experience has contributed to the growth of both online shopping and home delivery and store pickups from local supermarkets. White people will pay a premium just to not have to stand in line with diversitarians.

      Subconsciously, that is true, but the demoralization is so strong that most white people do not seem to be actively aware that “diversity” is a large part of, if not entirely the reason they’d rather stay home. Instead, they believe their “social anxiety” and “people suck” mentality is the result of their own biological disorders and misanthropy justified by some sort of inherent flaw that they assume can be found in all societies.

      This is why I disagree with those who feel that if we simply restore a sense of community among white people that the “politics will come naturally” — we obviously have the lowest in-group preference of the races to have been so widely demoralized like this in the first place, so it’s pretty clear that we have to be ideological about our survival as a race.

      • Hammerstrike

        There needs to be more focus on the importance of discipline, duty, vigilance, unwavering resolution and accurate knowledge.
        How about it? Make yourself part of making the great push back happen!

      • free_peach

        You struck the right chord. Really makes you think.

      • Love and Justice

        Have we seen a similar demoralization campaign fail on non-whites? Have we seen their children raised from early childhood to think their people are evil and responsible for inequality all over the world? It might be that any race would founder under our conditions.

    • TheLulzWarrior

      Reprobate behaviour grew alongside the post-war consumerism and (already pozzed) mindsets, it was why the 1960s wave of social engineering worked so well and made many of the boomers the way they still are today.

      Dissolution and apathy must be rejected. Both for the self-interest of the individual and in the struggle against the heinous evils of the Current Year.

  • Divosa Uplanovytch

    Will you commit a sanctvm actvm out there?

    • AnnBrady

      Levante da cadeira e faça. Pau no cu de comunista.

  • QuickshooterMk2

    comic is misleading, it’s not regular whites who riot like a bunch of animals
    it’s the Niggers who behave like animals on Blackfriday

    besides, online shopping is clearly superior to whatever crappy discounts “retail” can give you

    • FrankGarrett

      this broke israeli faggot sounds like he pays his landlord by sliding nickles under his door at night, using his nose.

  • Rando Numba Nine

    This is why we do Cyber Monday instead like true civilized people.

  • Bullshit_Latin_Phrase2931

    Hey RedPanels, what’s the price for murder?

    • True socialism.

      • Bullshit_Latin_Phrase2931

        Do you know the story or not?

  • Major Matt Mason

    And to you! 😀

  • Yank


  • All American

    It’s a good thing guns are banned in London. Some of the victims might have survived the stabbings.

  • Three Parentheses

    To the 14/88 people: How do you feel about the countless massacres of christian Poles, Czechs, Ukrainians, etc etc by the Third Reich?

    • A Snake With Bread

      didnt happen

    • TRVTH

      The Soviets were caught lying about the Katyn Forest Massacre and presenting phony evidence during Stalin’s show-trials at Nuremberg after the war. The evidence is rather stronger that these massacres were actually carried out by the (((NKVD))) then blamed on the Germans.

      • Three Parentheses

        Lidice didn’t happen either? Volhynia? The entire Eastern Front after 1941?

        • TRVTH

          All of these places were at some point under Soviet occupation, were they not? The (((NKVD))) is known to have left mass graves of White Christian folk wherever they went, racking up body counts in the tens of millions before the war even began. Please present your evidence that the Germans were responsible, and please show your work. Soviet propaganda doesn’t count. Neither do coerced confessions extracted under torture at Nuremberg.

          Even (((Wikipedia))) now admits that the deaths of Poles in Volhynia were at Ukrainian hands, not German, by the way.

          • Three Parentheses

            Czechiya and Galicia weren’t under Soviet rule at the time, no. GPO didn’t say a word about Bolsheviks or Jews either.

          • TRVTH

            Not until a handful of years later, when the (((NKVD))) rolled in and began putting White Christian folk into mass graves, yes.

            I do not find Soviet propaganda claiming the mass graves were already there to be plausible.

            And if you are talking about mass murder in Europe during the 20th Century and you are not mentioning Bolshevik Jews, then you are lying by omission.

          • Three Parentheses

            So they massacred Czechs and Poles preemtively to keep Stalin from massacring them?

          • TRVTH

            Not preemptively. The Soviet state, which (((they))) controlled, with Stalin as their puppet, was provoked by all those goyim, who existed at them menacingly. Menacingly! For no good reason!

          • Three Parentheses

            But the mistreatment started already in 1939-1940, when Hitler and Stalin were allies.

          • TRVTH

            The “mistreatment”–mass murders–that the (((Bolsheviks))) inflicted on White Christian folk all over Eastern Europe–began in 1917 when they overthrew the Tsar. From Finland to the Caucasus, from Riga to Kiev, they sat on pyramids of human skulls like nothing seen since the days of Genghis Khan, smirking and rubbing their grubby hands together with glee. And did it again in Hungary a few years later when the terrorist (((Bela Kun))) seized power. And again in Spain in 1936, though they were shortly overthrown.

          • Three Parentheses

            Cool story. How does it justify the removal and massacre of Poles, Czechs, Ukrainians, etc by the SS and Wehrmacht?

          • TRVTH

            What massacres? We know the Bolshevik Jews massacred White Christians everywhere in Europe that they took power, every place occupied by the Red Army. And we know that (((Soviet))) agitprop during and after the war would have you believe that there weren’t (((NKVD))) death-squads following right behind the Red Army, filling roadside ditches with White Christian Ukrainians, Poles, Czechs, Estonians, Bulgarians, and Romanians, but too many witnesses escaped to tell the tale.

            We know that the Red Army massacred tens of millions in Eastern Europe even before the war started. This is well documented. For your claims, we have not much more to go on than the usual wartime agitprop from (((the usual suspects))), who are the ones who perfected that agitprop method in the first place–deny, deflect, minimize, apologize, and reverse victim and offender–a generation before the war.

          • Three Parentheses

            Pretty based trying to change the subject like that.

          • TRVTH

            Isn’t it amazing how during and after the war the (((Soviets))) kept finding so many mass graves in territory they occupied, and waving the bloody shirt?

            It’s almost as if they already knew where they were.

          • Three Parentheses

            >I’ve got no answers so let’s talk about something else

          • TRVTH

            OK NPC.

          • Three Parentheses

            I was replying entirely on point throughout our exchange.

            Wanna try again? Explain to me how do the atrocities of the Third Reich against Christian Europeans supported the interest of the white race.

          • TRVTH

            What atrocities? Find verification that is not dependent upon Soviet wartime propaganda and not confessions extracted under torture for the Nuremberg show-trials, please.

          • Three Parentheses

            I listed a number of them, none of which you addressed.

            Anyway, thanks for playing. Hope this was an educational experience for other people following this discussion. Keep out of 14/88, kids! It makes you a bad faith internet troll 😉

          • Chris Redfield
          • TRVTH

            You’re talking about mass murder in Europe during the 20th Century. If you’re not naming the (((Bolsheviks))) as the perpetrators, you’re lying by omission at the very least.

          • Three Parentheses

            There’s no omission in stating that the SS and Wehrmacht killed thousands of Polish, Czech, etc civilians. These were not preventive acts as you seem to suggest, and in fact many of them happened when Hitler and Stalin were allies and cooperated with each other. How does the removal of ethnic Poles from Galicia contribute in any way to the cause of the white race?

          • Chris Redfield

            Partisans were killed. The German soldiers who were caught committing war crimes by deliberately killing innocent civilians were tried under court and shot.

          • Chris Redfield

            The Soviet Union was 2 weeks away from mobilizing their massive army to invade Germany and the rest of Europe. The communists would quite often commit massacres (if not create completely false atrocity propaganda) and blame them on Germans.

  • Rhode Islander

    Turkies are cool but syrians are just as cool. I prefer canada geese

  • fiberbriver

    hell yeah stonetoss hates capitalism, stonetoss is a socialist confirmed

  • Lhassir

    Rabid consumerism is one of the “slow deaths” of any culture. Your way of life slowly starts to revolve around objects and brands, traditions become monetized and marketed, holidays become meaningless and glorified shopping trips. Soon, products and brands become indistinguishable from your own culture.

  • epicskoobi

    bro would it not be epic if i edited the final panel to say femdom friday instead

  • david long

    This is unfairly insulting towards Turkeys, they legitimately need food.

  • don quixotes fetid corpse

    “Have you tried…not consuming?”

Primary Sidebar