Skip to content
  • Lhassir

    Virtue signaling will truly be societies ideological Darwinism. You welcome invaders to look good for your smoothbrained friends, but with those newcomers, also come their issues, whether cultural, behavioral, and in this case pathologic. It’s wishful thinking that these people would really learn anything while they’re bed ridden in a mass crowded hospital. while their lungs are filling with fluid and coughing uncontrollably. If only the consequences of their idiocy didn’t reflect on people who aren’t out of touch.

    • Moving Urbanly

      dariwnism is reprobate and insanity

      • CMK

        The idea that animals of one “type” (like a reptile) could ever become an animal of another “type” (like a bird) by evolutionary means I cannot believe is possible; but Darwin is right when it comes to micro-evolution.

        • TRVTH

          The universe doesn’t appear to care about our opinions when it comes to what is or isn’t possible.

          • CMK

            Macro-evolution is false.

          • TRVTH

            Argument from personal incredulity isn’t an argument.

      • TRVTH

        Darwin’s model predicts and explains why Negroes aren’t human and aren’t capable of surviving in environments that aren’t warm enough to sleep on the ground year-round and lack abundant low-hanging fruit barring unsustainable wealth transfers from productive humans.

    • EnvyReaper

      Honestly anyone stupid enough to go to China deserves the Coronavirus.

    • shapolo

      Open your borders, bigot. Let me spit on your face

      *cof cof

  • TRVTH

    You’ve probably already heard, but the “novel coronavirus” has been analyzed and found to have sections of genes from HIV–as in AIDS–spliced into it.

    Remember that “secret” biowarfare lab in Wuhan? It’s starting to look like the workers there opened up their Li’l Frankenstein Biological Warfare Genetic Engineering Kit (only $99.99 at Harbor Freight) and called up something they can’t put down.

    Does anyone wonder if one of the workers, while stealing everything that wasn’t bolted down and selling it out the back door, took some kind of incubator and sold it to someone who made it into a rat, cat, bat, and monkey rotisserie roaster? Mmm, mmm, good.

    • Niki Avranov

      what are you saying.

      • EnvyReaper

        He is saying that the Cornavirus came from China’s biowarfare labs.

        Honestly I wouldn’t put it past them to be responsible for this.

        • Niki Avranov

          wow thats sounds awful. So he claims China tried to develop this as some kind of weapon?

          Like, dont get me wrong, i dont want to jump to conclusions but the idea itself is just scary.

          I really hope this is not the reality.

          • Twilk9

            It’s not reality. The “research” that hes getting his info from about it being spliced from HIV comes from a single, not peer reviewed paper that the authors took down because they said they hadnt researched it enough.

            In effect, it pointed out that four inserts in the virus were shared with HIV.

            However, these inserts are also shared in loads of other viruses, including the bat coronavirus that the current virus is thought to be derived from.

            As an analogy, saying that these viruses must have been spliced from HIV because of these inserts is like saying diet coke must be made from urine, since they both have salt and water in them. While ignoring that almost every other beverage also has salt and water, including the most likely ancestor, regular coke.

            And also, two of these four inserts were only matched to HIV because the authors lined up their inserts wrong.

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            “Peer review” isn’t an argument. Whether the HIV proteins were added remains up for debate; the nature of the virus as man-altered is not.

          • Twilk9

            It’s a good thing that wasnt my only argument then. Or did you only read that far?

            “Whether the HIV proteins were added remains up for debate; the nature of the virus as man-altered is not.”

            According to what information?

            And by the way, “not peer reviewed” IS a valid argument, particularly when the paper in question has LITERALLY HALF of their findings wrong due to author error. Error that peer review would have pointed out.

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            >>according to what information

            The behavior of the CCP in response to the event, the proximity of the facility to the “source” of the outbreak, the nature of the work at the facility, the theft of coronavirus, and the history of Chinese engineering. Oh, and the way the virus is behaving and the manner in which it’s being treated.

            >>is a valid argument

            Not anymore. “Peer review” is a scam, ideologically. Reproducibility remains the metric by which scientific fact is determined; peer review has nothing whatsoever to do with reproducing results.

          • Twilk9

            “Oh, and the way the virus is behaving and the manner in which it’s being treated.”

            How is the way its behaving and being treated indicative of whatever its man made? What leads you to conclude that? Details, please.

            “the theft of coronavirus”

            What does this even mean? How do they ‘steal’ the coronavirus, a virus that is found worldwide?

            “The behavior of the CCP in response to the event, the proximity of the facility to the “source” of the outbreak, the nature of the work at the facility”

            In other words: conjecture, conjecture, and conjecture. This doesnt make you KNOW anything. Wuhan is one of the single largest cities on earth and thus a hotbed for disease. Did you suspect foul play when Legionnaires disease broke out in New York city a few years back? After all the Rockefeller Institute for Infectious disease is there.

            And correct, reproducibility remains the greatest tool for verifying results. But peer review remains the greatest tool for catching errors, post and pre analytical. Which is what matters in this case, where half of the findings were false based on error and results were only extrapolated to HIV in order to prove something.

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            >>How is the way it’s behaving

            The nature of its mutations and its survivability off-body.

            >the manner in which it’s being treated

            It responds to treatments used for HIV. Flu doesn’t do this. Pay attention.

            >>what does this even mean

            If you’re too stupid to understand English, don’t post in English. It couldn’t be simpler. It’s a four word phrase. Get a clue, retard. archive (DOT) md (SLASH) U3Eq6

            >>in other words

            Oh look, it’s the CIDF. “OY VEY THE COMMUNIST CHINK GOVERNMENT TOTALLY DOESN’T LIE ABOUT NUMBERS! IT DOESN’T LIE ABOUT ITS BEHAVIORS! IT WOULD NEVER COVER ANYTHING UP! YOU DON’T KNOW NOTHING GOYIM” Just kill yourself. You’re not fooling anyone.

            >Did you suspect

            >after all

            Great job listing the Rockefellers and then claiming there’s no conspiracy behind anything. Tell your boss to fire you.

            >>peer review remains

            No, it has been thoroughly invalidated. There is nothing reproduced in “peer review.” Papers aren’t even read, much less replicated.

          • Twilk9

            “The nature of its mutations and its survivability off-body.”

            This coronavirus has so far shown to be as survivable off body as other coronavirus; that is to say, not very. What mutations are you talking about? You are still not giving specifics.

            “responds to treatments used for HIV. Flu doesn’t do this. Pay attention.”

            True, flu doesnt do this. But other human coronviruses like SARS and MERS do and have responded to HIV antivirals the same way as this one. Again, this is something normal for coronavirus. Pay attention.

            As for your response to “theft,” your URL doesnt work. Why not just explain it, if its apparently so simple a retard can get it?

            All the insults in the world wont change the fact that your thoughts of “because china” is still pure conjecture, and does not mean you know ANYTHING factually. Cute witty insults though.

            The Rockefeller one was just an example, but if you’d rather get caught on details then here’s another one; would you think the NYU Center for Infectious Disease is behind the legionnaires outbreak, then? Same city, different biosecure facilities.

            And you are still not understanding. Reproducibility and peer review do DIFFERENT THINGS, and are both necessary. Reproduction verifies results. Peer review checks for obvious error. Which would have been useful in this case. It is the difference between checking an interview for typos and obvious misunderstanding, and redoing an interview to make sure the answers are the same.

            Recap: explain what mutations specifically cause you to think its man made. And explain the “theft” of a virus, found worldwide, by the country that had access to the most dangerous recent coronavirus anyway (SARS).

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            >URL

            Of course it doesn’t work. I had to break it to get the post to go through. Holy ƒuck, you’re dense.

            >why not just

            Because you’ll dismiss facts off-hand unless they’re shoved in your face. I’m not wasting my time doing things that don’t matter to ßhills like you. The link is for people who aren’t so subhumanly retarded that they can’t spend five seconds on a search engine to figure out that China did, in fact, steal coronavirus samples from Canada last year.

            >>your thoughts of “because china”

            Sorry, kiddo. You failed. No one said this. Defend the commie chinks at your own peril.

            >>are both necessary

            Uh… no. Reproducibility is, in itself, the evidence needed. There does not need to be an agglomeration of “oh yeah i totally read it dude they’re legit” when we have proven, authoritatively, that peer review is conceptually a fraud. Peer review checks nothing. You’ve been told this repeatedly. They do NOTHING at all. AI-generated papers have made it through “peer review.” Handwritten papers on fictional concepts have made it through “peer review.” It doesn’t exist.

          • Twilk9

            “Of course it doesn’t work. I had to break it to get the post to go through. Holy ƒuck, you’re dense.”

            Lol that’s obvious. But the url leads to an error. I am unable to access the page.

            The only thing I can find about the alleged “theft” is news claiming that a CBC story reported that two chinese spies were escorted from a biosecurity lab in canada, with SPECULATION that they stole coronavirus samples.

            But here’s the thing; not only is the coronavirus not mentioned at all in any actual reports, but the original reports say they were not spies, just a husband and wife staff and a few of their students. Spy stuff was added by the grapevine later on.

            Which is why I was hoping for a better explanation or a source from you. I would hope you wouldn’t make a case on such baseless media frenzy.

            “Sorry, kiddo. You failed. No one said this. Defend the commie chinks at your own peril.”

            Well, YOU certainly did. With your claims that since its china they’re lying about deaths, morbidity, etc.

            And you know what? I agree with you. China probably is lying about a lot. But guess what: they coverup, lie, and iron-fist everything EVERY TIME theres an epidemic. They did it for swine flu, bird flu, SARS, etc. The fact that they’re doing it AGAIN does not prove some shadowy conspiracy about man made virus. That’s just how china is – a communist authoritarian state that will do anything to prevent unrest.

            “Reproducibiliy”

            And again, you show you dont understand the difference between peer review and reproduction. Yes, if a fictional paper has shown no pre analytical, post analytical, or analytical error, it would pass peer review. Peer review has NOTHING to do with the findings. It just checks that people didnt make dumb mistakes trying to get to the findings.

            And dumb mistakes were clearly made in Pradhans paper, that peer review would have caught.

            So, those mutations you said would show that its man made? You gonna show those or not? Still waiting on them.

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            EAT ß H I T, S H A D O W B A N S. HOLY ƒ U C K IT’S STILL NOT GOING THROUGH. FIVE TIMES NOW.

            >>But the url leads to an error

            Ah, well. archive (DOOOOOOT) md (SLAAAAAAASH) U3Eq6

            Not sure why that wouldn’t work. Archive sometimes goes down.

            >> not only is the coronavirus not mentioned at all in any actual reports, but the original reports say they were not spies, just a husband and wife staff and a few of their students.

            Yes, that’s literally how spies work. They pretend to be things they’re not. Like the hundreds of jewish “art students” from the “University of Jerusalem” (doesn’t exist) who were caught photographing US government buildings and drawing up their floor plans, including buildings which were not publicly known to be for the government.

            >>Well, YOU certainly did. With your claims that since its china they’re lying about deaths, morbidity, etc.

            You’re clinically insane. You’re literally defending proven CCP lies.

            >>It just checks that people didnt make dumb mistakes…

            Like fabricating the findings. Fabricating the concept of the findings. Fabricating the entire nature of the paper. Lying about the contents of the paper. Which you’re now admitting it doesn’t find. So it’s worthless to science and the scientific method. Completely and utterly. Thanks for admitting it.

            >>So, those mutations you said would show that its man made? You gonna show those or not? Still waiting on them.

            Okay, keep waiting then. If you’re too brain damaged to No matter how much you want to cover it up, you’ll be forced to accept fact eventually. Oh, did you know that foreign governments are now doing direct investigations to uncover the nature of the genetic changes? Well, I’ll be! Now go back to sucking off the CCP’s official narrative as though it’s fact.

          • Twilk9

            “Yes, that’s literally how spies work”

            Except that all the speculation about them being spies who stole coronavirus – speculation not included in any actual reports, and only added by internet commenters later on – happened a year AFTER the incident actually occurred, when the coronavirus broke out. In other words; all this “info” about them being spies who stole coronavirus was added later on by internet commentators trying to find a way to prove how china “made” the coronavirus.

            That’s not solid proof at all. That’s grasping at straws.

            “You’re clinically insane. You’re literally defending proven CCP lies.”

            No, lol. Did you read what I said? I’m not defending them at all. My point is that theyve ALWAYS lied, about every pandemic/epidemic, and the fact that they’re doing it again is not proof that they “made” this virus. It’s conjecture.

            Unless you’re claiming that china secretly made every pandemic in recent history?

            “Oh, did you know that foreign governments are now doing direct investigations to uncover the nature of the genetic changes? ”

            Lol of course they are, because knowing what changes are present are the first step do developing containment protocols. They do the same thing with influenza; you have to know exactly what neuriminidase and hemagglutinin a strain of flu’s gene’s code for before you can fight it. Again; this is something normal for EVERY disease, not even just coronavirus strains.

            So does this mean you’re not going to share these mutations that are solid proof of being man made? Even though they would prove you right?

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            Your continued illiteracy is disturbing, particularly since you can do the same research I’ve done to see this information on your own. Try reading the post again.

          • Twilk9

            I am still unable to access your specific URL. But every other source I’ve seen describing the incident, which occurred a year ago, makes no mention of chinese spies or coronavirus.

            The only time these things are mentioned are in recent, speculative posts that occurred while the outbreak has been happening, a year after the incident. Unless your URL has definitive information proving that these are chinese spies who stole a dangerous coronavirus (which in itself makes no sense, since the most recent dangerous Corona outbreak – SARS – also occurred in china, and they already had access to it), then it is just speculation by internet bloggers trying to link the two together.

            So at this point the only evidence you have that china manufactured this disease is internet speculation that an incident that occurred a year ago was due to chinese spies stealing a coronavirus. Speculation that only started once the outbreak occurred.

            Unless youd like to finally share these mutations you claim are proof of artificial intervention?

            After all, statements require substantiation.

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            WOW. WOW. HOLY ƒUCKING ßHIT. YOU CAN’T EVEN TYPE IT THE WAY I WANTED TO TYPE IT. YOU CAN’T BREAK YOUR LINKS. YOU HAVE TO SPELL OUT THE SYNTAX, OTHERWISE IT BLOCKS YOUR POST FROM EVER SHOWING UP.

            EVERYONE WHO MADE DISQUS NEEDS TO KILL THEMSELVES.

          • Twilk9

            I dont think the url is the problem. I think the problem is that you clearly have NO IDEA what you’re talking about.

            You think that the new coronavirus must be artificial because of its survivability in the environment – because you DIDNT KNOW that it’s been shown to be as survivable as other infectious human coronavirus.

            You think that it must be artificial because it responds to treatment by HIV antivirals – because you DIDNT KNOW that HIV antivirals have historically been used to treat all infectious human coronavirus.

            You think that the fact that research is being done to study the variations in this strain indicates that it’s artificial – because you DIDNT KNOW that this is something done with ALL new strains of disease, including the different strains of flu that happen every year.

            You think its artificial because of how china has likely lied about its extent – because you DIDNT KNOW that china has lied about every epidemic in the past thirty years, and didnt even tell the world about SARS until 5 months after it broke out.

            You think the fact that the outbreak took place in the same city as a virology institute is proof that its artificial – because you DIDNT KNOW that every major city has SEVERAL biosecure infectious disease labs, and wuhan is one of the largest cities on earth.

            “Okay, keep waiting then.”

            For your genetic mutations that prove its artificial? The ones that you must surely know because they definitely exist, and you just FEEL like not showing them (but they definitely exist, you guys)? Lol ok

            I’m sorry you wanted a safe space where people wouldn’t argue against your ideas and say they’re false. But if you wanted that, you shouldnt have started an argument about something you clearly know nothing about.

            Tell your boss to fire you.

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            >>I dont think the url is the problem.

            No, it is. The post wouldn’t go through without artificially censoring it.

            >>I think the problem is that you clearly have NO IDEA what you’re talking about.

            Okay, run along.

            >>You think that the new coronavirus must be artificial because of its survivability in the environment

            Nope, because it was released from a facility which creates bioengineered viruses as weapons.

            >>you DIDNT KNOW that it’s been shown to be as survivable as other infectious human coronavirus.

            I did, in fact.

            >>HIV antivirals have historically been used to treat all infectious human coronavirus.

            And other non-HIV drugs; yes, I knew that, too.

            >>you DIDNT KNOW that this is something done with ALL new strains of disease

            Did know it, yeah.

            >>you DIDNT KNOW that china has lied about every epidemic in the past thirty years

            Knew that.

            >>you DIDNT KNOW that every major city has SEVERAL biosecure infectious disease labs

            No, Wuhan is the only one in China that is a level 4 facility, has coronavirus because it was stolen from Canada last year, and which operates as part of the PLA to develop biological weapons.

            >>you just FEEL like not showing them

            When you get near an argument, hop on.

            >>I’m sorry you wanted a safe space where people wouldn’t argue against your ideas and say they’re false.

            Project harder. Everything you said is irrelevant to the proof that has already been posted. Cry more about your precious chinks and their bioweapon.

          • Twilk9

            “Knew that.”

            Then please, answer these questions:

            -if you knew the coronavirus is as survivable as all other coronavirus, why did you think the survivability was proof that its man made?

            -if you knew the coronavirus responds to HIV antivirals like all other coronavirus, why was that proof that it was man made? PARTICULARLY since you made the point that “uh uh not even flu responds to HIV meds”

            -if you knew that every new disease has its variations researched, why even bring it up as proof that its man made? Why did you think it was proof that its man made?

            -if you knew that china has lied about every epidemic, then why is them lying about this one proof that its man made?

            So that’s FOUR QUESTIONS you need to answer, right there. Were you just bringing up that “evidence” for fun? After all, you knew all that already, right, you very smart guy?

            “Wuhan is the only one in China that is a level 4 facility”

            Too bad MERS and SARS and all coronavirus are handled and stored at BSL 3 facilities. Just another thing you didnt know. Or did you know that too and are just bringing it up for fun, like everything else you brought up? Lol

            “was stolen from Canada last year”

            According to what? The internet commentators that only started mentioning the idea when the outbreak first happened? Wheres your proof? Name a source. One from before the outbreak. You dont even need a url. I’ll google it.

            “irrelevant to the proof that has already been posted.”

            Lol what proof? Every proof you mentioned is just that this coronavirus is the same as every other coronavirus epidemic. And then you claim you KNOW that.
            How is that proof?

            Oh, and your 4chan rumors that this virus was stolen from canada. Cant forget that iron clad proof. Lol

            The only proof you MIGHT have is your mutations. But you wont bring them up because you just dont feel like it. Oh but they’re definitely real, right?

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            “So he claims”

            No, it’s proven. Wuhan has China’s only Biohazard Level 4 laboratory, and it’s an hour from the claimed source of the virus. The lab works with coronavirus. The Chinese stole coronavirus from a Canadian lab last year. And finally, every nation has a biological weapons program.

            These are all facts that everyone knows already.

    • CMK

      If what you said is true, and the Chinese people find out about this, they may very well overthrow their government.

    • Twilk9

      Lol ok, sure. Where are you getting this “info” from?

      First-rate conspiracy theory, by the way

      • Shadowban This Cowards

        It’s coming from independent groups of geneticists in other countries, you subhuman retard.

        • Twilk9

          Yeah? Can you name one other, besides Pradhan’s?

      • Groyp Style

        Look into it faggot retard.

        • Twilk9

          Well maybe YOU can name another group that supports that its spliced with HIV. Aside from Pradhan. Can you?

  • Indra Kaw
    • A Snake With Bread

      Needs more jpeg

  • NPC the Clown

    Sorry bud, but a couple of limes won’t get rid of your aids.

  • New England Firefighter

    Are we just going to forget that the Foo Fighters are AIDS deniers?

    • Go away you alt-left exremist.

      You and you’re ItalianEMT alt. account.

      • New England Firefighter

        No point in arguing with a homophobic antisemitic victim playing child. takes a douche to know a douche

        • lol, yes everybody who calls you out for being a douchebag and making an alternate account to argue (ItalianEMT) is a nazi.

          So you admit you also support pedophilia, because I never said anything homophobic, but I did say I was against pedophilia.

          Typical firefighter douchebag.

          • New England Firefighter

            You literally called me a “faggot” and keep making up conspiracies. as my Rabbi told me, Why be mad when you can be sorry.

          • lol, you’re still bugging me?

            I thought you were using your ItalianEMT account.

            You should be used to be called a “faggot” by now.

            Also, didn’t you say firefighters bust each others balls but you’re one of the most insecure people I’ve ever talked to online.

            Go cry, you snow flake douchebag, read my profile name, then piss off.

          • New England Firefighter

            okay, Child,

          • So you’re following and harassing children online? So you don’t just support pedophiles, you are one. Makes sense. Now, go away?

          • New England Firefighter

            oh so you are a child? explains so much. I think your computer time is up. did you ask for a parents permission before getting online?

          • New England Firefighter

            Oh so you are a child? this website isn’t for you then, you should probably get parental permission. I mean I should have known by the way you acted.

          • lol, is this another alternate account?

            So you defend the guy harassing children online?

            More proof firefighters are douchebags.

            Also, it’s sad if children act more mature than you guys do.

            Really pathetic.

          • lol, of course it’s still you, but you changed your account to look like somebody else leaving a comment.

            Third time you’ve done this?

            You really are a loser, aren’t you?

  • Divosa Uplanovytch

    At least my bodie knows how is to live in the third word that my colonialist nation opressed!

  • QuickshooterMk2

    Faggots make a lot of noise but their life expectency is thankfully very short https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8df228d8cf351def542f8572864ce92dd1e2ad67694c05820c2039a62f31d9c4.jpg

    • Kosta Kosta

      Source? As a bisexual, you are pitful

      • QuickshooterMk2

        Bisexual Jewish Male or Female?
        wait, is there a difference?

        • Kosta Kosta

          I’m a bisexual Slavic male who grew up in Germany

          • QuickshooterMk2

            homosexual jew living in germany
            gotcha

          • Kosta Kosta

            Nah. My ancestors are all from the Balkan. And I’m not homosexual, I’m sexually interested in both men and women

          • QuickshooterMk2

            Have you ever fucked a man or you’re merely posing as “look at me i’m so progressive”?

          • Kosta Kosta

            Nope, but I flapped to some Yaoi hentai

          • QuickshooterMk2

            That’s pretty gay… but that doesn’t really count
            unless you actively view the anus of a man as attractive “plunder” or wish you plundered by another man, then you are by definition gay

            but i get it, you’re trying to make yourself “i’m so special and unique” by proclaiming you’re into sodomy so your (((fellow))) mentally ill peers view you as more than just a base k*ke trying to virtue signal in order to get some pozzed-p✡️ssy

          • EnvyReaper

            I am sorry to say it, but calling someone a Jew doesn’t make them a Jew nor does it mean you have won the internet argument.

          • It hink its even worse… He might be Bosnian…

          • Groyp Style

            You’re disgusting and a faggot.

          • Doctor Cool

            As if you’re any better testicle nose, you’re a israeli gay Zionist jew, living in a hostel in the middle east.
            Your life is shittier than the sewer your repulsive Rumpelstiltskin ass crawled from you zombie queer you.

          • Groyp Style

            Doomed to aids or hep.

      • Shadowban This Cowards

        Don’t worry. The second before you pull the trigger, you’ll realize that your entire life was a lie.

  • Albionic American

    If male homosexuality emerged today as a new disorder, without all the propaganda, gaslighing, indoctrination and official lying in place to “normalize” this manifestation of broken human biology, it would alarm the health care community.

    • CMK

      What about female homosexuality?

      • Shadowban This Cowards

        Same, he’s just a leftist cuck who won’t admit he watches it and therefore doesn’t want it to go away.

    • Oscar David

      Why are there homosexual animals?

  • Steffen

    All those biofashists. It’s infuriating.

    • TRVTH

      Reality has a right-wing bias.

  • Albionic American

    Leftists of a philosophical turn write about how our form of society results in the alienation of normal human relationships, the objectification and instrumental use of the human body abstracted from the individual’s personhood, and the exploitation of people in less developed societies.

    So what do many gay men do? They engage in alienating, objectifying and instrumental “sex acts” with strangers in seedy venues, because they don’t want to bother with the process of making acquaintances with these men first by even learning their names. And the ones with money and passports travel as sex tourists to poor, often nonwhite countries to bugger the impoverished local boys. Thomas Mann showed that he knew of this practice a century ago with his story, Death in Venice.

    But because gay men have become the left’s favorite client group, they get a pass on their contributions to the dysfunctions of late-capitalist society.

    • EnvyReaper

      Bro this text wall has nothing to do with the comic, it’s just a play on the whole bug-chasers joke.

      • Shadowban This Cowards

        Imagine being you.

        • EnvyReaper

          Haha come back to get assblasted and btfo’d again huh?

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            No seriously, imagine spamming your nonsense here and thinking that anyone is going to believe you. Statements require substantiation. You have none.

          • EnvyReaper

            Haha unlike you I don’t require internet validation to believe in my opinions, faggot

          • Shadowban This Cowards

            Project harder, please. You might get bright enough to show a movie. No one is going to believe what you say, though.

          • EnvyReaper

            >Haha unlike you I don’t require internet validation to believe in my opinions, faggot

  • Major Matt Mason
  • Pratim Gupta

    *Too much earth population*

    Nature: Awaken my masters

Primary Sidebar