Skip to content
Don't tell dad.

149 Comments

Gay men get a pass on objectifying men’s bodies all the time, when feminists complain that straight men oppress women by objectifying their bodes. Not to mention that the male homosexuals with money and passports can travel to less developed countries as sex tourists and bugger the impoverished brown boys, and that they have done so for generations. (This practice lies under the tip of the iceberg that Thomas Mann reveals in his story, “Death in Venice.”) Some of these homosexual predators even decide to move to these countries and live there full time, like the late science author Arthur C. Clarke.

This reminds me, what ever happened to “Saint Elon’s” accusation that the British diver who became an expat in Thailand did so because he was a pedophile?

…I never could get into Clarke’s books, his pederasty is probably why.

Clarke’s novel Imperial Earth, which he published back in the 1970’s, shows a gay relationship between two teenage boys in a colony on Saturn’s moon Titan a few centuries from now. Many science fiction writers like to play around with the idea of the Free-Love Future. Apparently it never occurs to them that future societies could become more sexually reserved and traditional after people understand the full extent of the disaster caused by sexual liberation. Especially when we can no longer deny that women’s sexual freedom results in more and more male sexual eviction.

Reference: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FreeLoveFuture

Sex dolls and artificial wombs. Women become completely free/redundant. Problem solved.

That’s, because most sci-fi is escapism. In a sense the author tries to escape their reality, and they write Free Love because they perceived the morality in their lives to be repressive.

It was, once. And if you’re talking about the pop-culture sci-fi film and TV genre, it still is–and cops who investigate child sexual abuse have likewise noticed that, while not all hard-core Star Trek fans are pedophiles, about 80% of the worst and most disgusting pedophiles are Trekkies, and no one is certain why. It’s not like it was a theme of the show. There have been a number of pedophilia scandals connected to the fringes of science fiction literature fandom in the past sixty years, one pertaining to a fellow named Walter Breen, one pertaining to Marion Zimmer Bradley, one to Ed Kramer, maybe others. Whether there is more of it in science fiction fandom than, say, stamp collecting, I don’t know.

As for escape literature, a lot of the prewar and early postwar science fiction was escape literature, adventure stories with rocket-ship and ray-gun trappings, especially the pulp stuff. But even in the 40s and 50s an awful lot of it contained noticeable, unsubtle political and historical allegory.

Poul Andersen’s Flandry stories, for example, written mostly in the 50s and 60s, were spy adventures IN SPAAAAACE–but the background was obviously an allegorical representation of the Cold War, about which Andersen was brutally pessimistic, and in the stories that came through. Asimov’s “Foundation” series was about the decline and fall of an interstellar empire, straight out of Gibbon.

By the 1970s if you picked any random copy of one of the pulp paper science fiction magazines of the time, Analog or Galaxy or Asimov’s or If, three quarters of the stories in it were about nuclear war, or the Energy Crisis, or environmental collapse, or the US government–or a transparently obvious allegorical stand-in for it–assassinating dissidents in order to rule over a polluted, irradiated dystopia. And in the 1980s came the “cyberpunk” subgenre, whose authors started with the assumption that all of these nightmarish dystopias were far too optimistic and not nearly nihilistic enough. Cyberpunk is basically despair porn about drug-addicted hackers and homeless veterans turned mercenary trying to avoid corporate security goons in bombed-out cities.

From 1990 on, the only publisher of note that publishes anything BUT despair porn or humorless didactic Marxist crap on a regular basis is a company called Baen Books. Baen still publishes some escapist adventure sci-fi. Pretty much the rest of the science fiction publishing universe can be summed up by finding an online copy (not difficult) of “If You Were a Dinosaur, My Love” by one Rachel Swirsky, who won a Hugo Award for it in 2014. Outside of science fiction fandom it isn’t commonly known, but a Hugo used to mean something. Go read her story, if you have the stomach for it, and that’s what Sci-Fi has turned into in the 21st Century. Similarly unpleasant themes can be stretched out into novels. A fellow named Peter Watts has made a career of writing them. I am not sure who reads them.

Robert Heinlein, another science fiction author, one whose later works explored themes of “free love” and incest, was a libertine and a weirdo, for all that he is worshipped by a certain sort of civnat, but he absolutely despised Clarke. Apparently it’s okay to write a story about a character using a time machine to go back in time and boink his own mom, but he drew a line at that gay stuff. Heinlein was ex-Navy, and I’ll let the rest of you make the jokes.

Lossy Western Women.

Me incel? Nah. I believe women are towers of a country. Strong women = strong country. It shouldn’t be muscle strong, but mentally and morally strong.

Women are sheep, and they reflect the character of their shepherds. Notice that the white slave owners had no trouble attracting white women who wanted to marry them and bear their children, despite the current nonsense that women show empathy for the oppressed. It took a Chad in spirit, if not in looks, to enslave Negroes and make them productive on his farm.

so, what? People never reproduced until they owned slaves?

The slave owners didn’t have an incel problem. Also it shows how women’s moral beliefs will conform to the values shown by the dominant men in their society. Women just don’t have anything like the level of agency and mental integrity that men possess.

Incel cope, as usual.

The big problem with this whole theory you keep spouting and “women are sheep” is that most men, especially today, possess even less “agency”. Most of you are chained to consumerism; bugmanning out over Marvel and playing video games for hours upon hours. Most white men today will tell you “racism” is the worst thing ever and especially “antisemitism”. Most “white nationalist” men today do nothing but complain about women and you cannot stay focused on the topic of race long enough to get anything done.

Men came to fight my country TWICE because we dared to defy the Jewish system. They wear this as a badge of honor even today and swear that “Israel is our greatest ally”. Men in your country sold it out to Jews with the Federal Reserve Act, nearly a decade before women could vote there. But I’m sure you’ll find some way to claim that was all women’s fault too! So that you can feel better about men not just failing in but BETRAYING what is supposed to be your primary job: Defend the tribe from outsiders.

Its apples and oranges, man. The slave owners, if they didn’t have an incel problem, didn’t have one because marriages were dictated by their wealthy families and were never based primarily on attraction.

Kind of shows that EVERYONE conforms to the values demonstrated by the dominant men in their society, no? Particularly since men literally dominated society then. And you’re wrong anyway; there were as many female abolitionists as there were male ones. Look it up, instead of saying what you think sounds right.

Whats that thing you’re always going on about as an indicator of intelligence? Time preference? You do know most research shows women have greater ability to save for the future than men, yes? Have you actually read any research on time preference?

Well, there you go. Thats what I’m saying; women didn’t control society, but they were still integral to social movements such as abolitionism and temperance, as you say. By no means are they “sheep that reflect the character of their shepherds,” as OP likes to post under every single comic with a picture of a woman.

I can’t remember where I read it, but there was a post a long time ago essentially rationalizing the mother’s support for her gay, bi, gender-queer pyro-fox kid as the female nurturing instinct run amok. Women are preternaturally disposed to bend over backwards to help their children or otherwise justify their behavior, most especially when defending their and their child’s status with other women.

It’s like that old line about mothers vs. fathers. Dad’s job is to tell you when you foul up and your mom’s job is to be your friend. It doesn’t make sense otherwise.

TL;DR – Mother’s are naturally inclined to defend their children’s decisions, perversions, and screw-ups because those faults reflect poorly on the mother, and defending the child and hamster-rationalizing their behavior helps mothers save face.

“Mother’s are naturally inclined to defend their children’s decisions”
Bwahahaha! Reprobate Current Year mindsets aren’t natural.
“It’s like that old line about mothers vs. fathers. Dad’s job is to tell you when you foul up and your mom’s job is to be your friend.”
We’ve seen that this line led to degeneracy. A good mother discipline the s… out of her children (within the limits of legality, of course).

So who broke your heart

Lmao, found the MGTARD

And I’ve found the Simp. But please, keep having no standards and dignity and blowing smoke up the arse of undeserving women. It’s not like they’re unbelievable entitle, ungrateful and narcissistic enough.

And FYI, none of us would exist without men either, so why don’t you praise them too? Or do your Daddy Issues get in the way?

I am a male already so why would I need to praise myself if I already think i’m good? Not all girls are the same, you must recognize that there are BIOLOGICALLY different than men, in their brain. That is why they lie a lot. They can’t help it. If a retarded kid can’t help but scream all the time will you hate him or just the action? Also most of my encounters with the female species are pretty great. You probably just had bad experiences so I can’t blame you.

Interesting. Not only did you compare girls to retarded kids, but you also called them a different species. I think we found the real misogynist.

And FYI, I’ve had bad experiences with pretty much everyone, of both genders. It’s why I’ve embraced the Black Pill with religious fervor.

Again, obvious Troll is obvious. But I’m bored, so I’ll bite.

Yes, a species can reproduce more of its kind, which normally requires both genders of the same species. If different species mate they can’t normally reproduce, unless they’re very closely related, like mules or ligers. And a lot of these hybrids are sterile.

Understand?

Wow you’re a moron, you probably just jack off to tranny porn and watch Sandman MGTOW all day. You know like 60% of girls have rape fantasies right? Not at all saying rape is good but you’ll probably site an anecdotal story about how some men do get accused on BS reasons but I think there is overall a net benefit in society speaking out against sexual abuse, for everyone. The truth is 99.99 people have consensual sex, no one is accused of rape. That’s beside the point as well because girls make good companionship. Like I said they don’t have the same brain so you can’t hate on some of their flaws.

Most rape fantasies are a result of untreated childhood trauma, especially sexual abuse. Men and women indeed have different brains, however that doesn’t mean I can’t hate on them for their flaws. I can hate on anyone for their flaws, regardless of brain structure. Black people have different brains than whites, specifically less neural pathways, less grey matter in the prefrontal cortex, and less complexity overall. Is 13/50 off the table now because those flaws likely come from their different brains?

Also that’s probably BS, girls without ‘trauma’ still have them, just because you think about murdering people doesn’t mean you murder people. You sound like a fcking radical feminist who hates all men by hating girls. You have a complete group-think ‘us vs. them’ tribalism-like mentality and operate on the logicl of a pre-schooler. You are just some scruffy, hairy pot-bellied fatass incel who needs to get LAID! Girls are way more based and cooler than your DUMBASS!

I figured you out ‘Black Spruce’ you are envious of us chads who can get girlfriends with ease and you’re angry at our superior, intelligence and charisma. You probably had a girlfriend once but when she found you shoving a big black dildo in your ass while you were showering, then she left you. You are a quitter, get up and try again, and don’t shove any more dildos in your ass and you can keep a girlfriend.

In a sense we would not exist without the female sex, it is true, but neither would they exist without the male sex (a sperm is needed to fertilize the egg … duh), so the fact that we cannot exist without them does not it gives no privilege or makes them superior in any way as it applies to them as well.

hey ya know you wouldn’t even exist without women, I love the female species, nothing better, beautiful kind nice smelling creatures all around friend.

I do not agree with the comment of blood storm, but it is not valid to classify the female sex as “An unwashed gutted fish” in the same way that it would not characterize the male sex as “a lot of rapists”, a few bad apples do not characterize everyone.

Rather the question is, what kind of women have you gotten together with ?, and in case you have gotten together with women who can be described as “An unwashed gutted fish” don’t let your bad decisions label an entire sex.

Hv a noice dai.

but yet you’re one of these [email protected] who complains about ‘muh illegal immigration’ and saving ‘muh white race’. Why don’t you have some goddanm kids you cuck and stop hating women? Because all us hispanics are out here fvcking ‘your’ white girls and having our children with them. While you sit here raging at us on the internet. We’re 10 steps ahead and we’re winning.

I’m in favor of illegal immigration. Quicker destruction of the US government and collapse of the welfare state. As for the white race, it’s extinction will cause innovation and technological advancement to grind to a halt, since the Japanese and Koreans will be gone shortly after. Third world cesspools will starve because of the dependence on white people, like Zimbabwe. To your typical person, that would all be bad. But to a person with a fringe and extreme ideology like myself, it would be beneficial.

Yes that’s what I was getting at, society wouldn’t function without men and women both getting along, including reproduction of our species which is pretty much the purpose of a species. Idiot. I’m not thirsty I just have a lot of friends that happen to have vaginas and you’re talking dumb shlt about stuff you don’t understand

Nothing like dog pics to may you seem in control

Doesn’t matter? Thats the beauty of it. It hurts, but you grow up, move on, and find someone else. It happens to everyone. Usually many times.

Beats stewing about it and hating people and becoming bitter, no? Give it a try sometime

What is it about Western wahmen that makes so many of them enthusiastic fag-hags? They LOOOOOVE men–so long as there’s no trace of sexual tension and they’re non-threatening, and can gossip with them and talk about clothes and nails, and then go home and sleep alone in their tiny apartments with their fourteen cats, all the while bitching and whining about how lonely they are, and that “all the good men are gay.”

Everyone
wants what they cannot have, and I was once told by a gay fella that
women are also attracted to gay men because they are “safe”, fwiw.

Are “fruit flies” the female version of the “Beta Orbiter”? That’s how I’ve seen it.

[Had to edit b/c censorship]

Well said, they feel very comfortable with gay men, but the problems start when there is some tiny spark of desire. Most women sometimes are attracted to you and don’t even know it, they don’t know how to deal with it, because they feel they were not supposed to be in the first place, as if you were beneath her.

They feel some itchy feeling, but can’t quite put the finger on what is going on, so they start to pick on you, making weird jokes and degrading/complimenting you in an indirect way. Most of the time it is the man who has to tell her, “it is clear you are attracted to me”, which she’ll promptly deny. Have found many women like that, some of them are such cowards about that, they would prefer to stay behind and gossip how “she would never date you” for women who are really considering dating you. It is so tiresome.

I have literally zero patience for women who can’t figure out what is that they are feeling and instead have to pretend that you have some kind of “attitude” that would be unacceptable. That thing is her feeling for you, that is unacceptable, but they would not take responsibility for it and will berate you instead.

That’s changed now. These days a lot of woman hate gay men, for the same reason they hate MGTOW, ie, they can’t control them so easily.

I’m curious, what is an MGTOW?

A guy who doesn’t date or have sex

Because mgtows are faggots too.

The same reason men enjoy having a “lesbian friend”. You get to talk to a woman and not feel like there’s any sexual tension, and many lesbians tend to be tomboys.

You basically get a female best friend who you can ask about women without thinking she’s into you.

Remember goy, boobies are bad. Get hooked on cocks, it’s truly good and natural to be gay goy, serve in anthropological deviation and mental illness and have no future generation.

Way choose? FUTA FUTURE BABY!

I know it is not the main topic but, I used to be addicted to pornography (and consequently masturbation), if anyone is addicted or is starting in that terrible habit, believe me when I tell you that it is going to destroy your lives, the excess of neurotransmitters will scour your brain and will not allow you to develop good habits and disciplines.

Better marry a virtuous woman and have sex with her until you can’t anymore, it will strengthen your relationship and it will be mutually rewarding.

http://stonetoss.com/comic/thats-the-rub/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar