Skip to content
  • Ambassador Vader

    I loved the old gay argument “it’s legal to have sex with a horse in 15 states but gay marriage is only legal in 3.”….. Maybe that’s because people who have sex with horses don’t have parades about it.

    • stormwindow

      I’m not so sure about that– historically (before automobiles), riding a horse were often seen in parades. But rational people presume that the riders don’t also engage in bestiality– only homos could devise such a deviant ruse.

      • Blarg Blarg

        Gays are naturally good at deviancy.

    • George VanderHaar

      And to be fair, it’s not illegal, but its not legal either, it could be considered animal cruelty.

      • Rickard Pierre Mauritz Edlund

        Only if its bad sex 😉

        • George VanderHaar

          Oh you

    • Stiffy Weiner

      You’ve clearly never gone to Equestria Con.

    • xvtc

      it’s actually because fucking horses is less morally wrong than gay sex

      • Dr.Weird

        by what metric, both are punishable by death biblically

    • Stiffy Weiner

      Oh so furries don’t exist?

    • Blarg Blarg

      The “sex with horses” crowd is observably less annoying and agenda pushing than fags.

  • ComicsFan

    Perfect example of slippery slope 😀 BTW I love the name of comic

  • An Cat Dubh

    I was not aware little girls had a bathroom specifically for them.

    • Blarg Blarg

      Such sweet irony if your dumb ass was raped by one of those freaks.

  • Cole Carac

    At least you acknowledge the fallacy you’re committing.

    • Francesco

      I wonder if it’s really a fallacy when there’s reason to believe otherwise though.

    • Andrew Meyer

      “We should not restrict tree cutting, because that will lead to less paper, without paper not enough diaper wipes will be made, without diaper wipes babies will get infections more often, babies getting more infections will lead to more babies dying. This means people who are against logging companies are okay with more babies dying.”

      THAT is a Slippery Slope Fallacy, because those events don’t directly affect each other, for a variety of different reasons.

      Sexual depravity leading to more sexual depravity is not a Slippery Slope Fallacy.

      • AwilAn

        Where is the sexual depravity leading to?

        • Andrew Meyer

          A Papua New Guinean culture, apparently.

          TL;DR boys up to 15 suck dicks and swallow cum in order to become men. No homo tho.

          Members of the Sambia tribe strongly believe that, in order for their boys to become real men, they need to ingest semen. Sambia boys, aged 7 to 10, are required to perform oral sex on older warriors and, in each session, they need to swallow the, erm, results.

          This tribe firmly believes that semen is the source of life and the essence of masculinity. The only way for the genitalia of their young male population to become fully developed is through oral sex. In addition, they believe that only by ingesting sperm can their young ones produce their own.

          Once the boys reach the age of 15, they stop becoming the givers of oral sex and start becoming the receivers. Also, boys who are of the same age or are friends are not allowed to engage in oral sex with each other. Surprisingly, it isn’t unusual for conflicting men within the tribe to engage in this ritual.

          Once the men get married, they are prohibited from further participating in this ceremony. Women’s genitals are believed to pollute the reproductive organs of the men, which in turn would make their semen “impure.”

          • AwilAn

            Alright cool some random tribe in Papua New Guinea has a weird rite of passage, nothing new honestly considering much weirder rites of passage.
            Now what about the “sexual depravity” happening in progressive civilisations accepting LGBT rights? That’s leading to what exactly?

          • Adam

            It’s just horribly offensive to people that civil rights laws are beginning to protect sexual orientation on the same basis as race, meaning you can’t deny a good or service to someone on that basis.

            It’s totally and perfectly reason (protip: this is stonetoss, it’s actually neither of those things).

          • Blarg Blarg

            It is leading to your disgusting kind to being hung from noble lampposts is what it is leading to. Good end of course. Bad end is you demonic clowns do actually start sacrificing children and babies to your molech and baphtomet fake gods.

          • Stiffy Weiner

            Time to travel!!

    • Kelly Thomas
    • Blarg Blarg

      What fallacy? You mean the very and objectively observable trend that is taking place in this rotten culture right now?
      Do you evil shitheads ever stop lying and deceiving?
      How many kids do have to be raped and killed for your kind to be sated?

      There will be no mercy for your side when the day of the rope comes.

  • Kakurenjou

    Except you DON’T have to participate in it. Baking a cake for a ceremony that you don’t even have to attend ≠≠≠ getting married to a man.
    Also, it’s literally the definition of discrimination to refuse a service to a specific group of people as you continue to offer it to everyone else. Not sure what your point was with that.

    • Blarg Blarg

      Discrimination is good. It keeps normal decent people from having to deal with your wretched, truth-adverse kind. Too bad what you said is false; regular people are being forced to go along with the faggot agenda.

  • Lucifer’s Good Twin

    Give a finger, lose an arm.

  • YukkiMons

    Cosmo and Wanda at the first panel tho

Primary Sidebar